• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged I killed Duality and Uncertainty for a Theory of Everything

pittsburghjoe said:
You and I both know Rule 4 doesn't apply to my own F'N content.
Click to expand...
1. You don't know what I know.
2. Rule 4 does not have an exception for your own content elsewhere. Further, if you have your content elsewhere, Rule 4 would have you link to it, not repeat it here.
3. Quit whining.
 
pittsburghjoe said:
You and I both know Rule 4 doesn't apply to my own F'N content.
Click to expand...

Yes, it does.

Let me give you a little advice.

The public notices section in Forum Management is full of ex-members that didn't understand that they didn't own the forum and make the rules.

The mods here have a certain amount of tolerance but if you believe that you're going to make the rules you will be shown the door.
 
Don't let these guys haze you, pbjoe. Just keep cranking your theory, and eventually it'll start.

Crank crank crank.
 
sackett said:
Don't let these guys haze you, pbjoe. Just keep cranking your theory, and eventually it'll start.

Crank crank crank.
Click to expand...

Should check for side fumbling in the turbo encabulator if it still won’t start.
 
I fought a duel with duality ... and duality won.


Oh, wait a minute, duality didn't win. They were caught using an additional player in a single player game and thrown out.
 
Elagabalus said:
I fought a duel with duality ... and duality won.


Oh, wait a minute, duality didn't win. They were caught using an additional player in a single player game and thrown out.
Click to expand...

Those dirty double-crossers! I'd think twice about playing again, unless it was for double or nothing. Who knows though -- third time's the charm!
 
pittsburghjoe said:
The Observer Effect You can be certain that the particle in question will be physical if you place anything that will acknowledge its existence while it propagates on its path.
Click to expand...
You are making the same mistake as all the others - assuming that something is 'physical' if it can be 'observed'.

But you are right that Duality isn't a thing anymore, because it never was. In fact nothing ever was. You see, none of it is real because we are all in The Matrix.

How do I know? Even the most powerful computer imaginable cannot simulate an infinite Universe with infinite resolution, for the simple reason that it would need more data and processing power than is in the Universe. So the simulation cannot be perfect. At very small scales the algorithms will produce anomalous results, like magnifying an image until you can see the individual pixels. And this is what we observe. What scientists call 'Quantum weirdness' is actually just the simulation's limited resolution.

If only scientists could get past their fixation with things having to be 'physical', they would see the truth - and might actually learn something about this simulation we live in. The clues are there, they just have to look at them in the right way.

We may never figure it all out, but one thing's for sure - to be as detailed and convincing as it is, the computer that runs The Matrix must be incredibly powerful - and the being that programmed it must have incredible intellect. Or perhaps they are one and the same, a robot with a brain the size of a planet - imagining our planet and everyone who lives on it. If we ever discover that this is indeed the case, will we call it God?
 
Last edited:
pittsburghjoe said:
You and I both know Rule 4 doesn't apply to my own F'N content.
Click to expand...
That is wrong, pittsburghjoe. Rule 4 has 2 parts.
  1. You will not post "copyrighted" material in its entirety and
  2. do not post large amounts of material available from other sites.
The first part is the obviously illegal act of violating copyright by copying it in its entirety.
The second part is the practical matter of not having enormous posts clogging up a thread and having to be hosted by the forum. If someone writes a book online then having that book as a post is impractical, especially when hyperlinks exist. That is the rule you broke in the OP as the admin told you:
"<SNIP> for rule 4
Please do not post material that is available elsewhere.

See here, for example.
Click to expand...
 
I wonder if the natural divide between the two realms can be explained more than just abbe diffraction limit.
Maybe there is an information limit that a single object can contain that is impossible to be represented as unobserved quantum waves.
 
The delayed choice quantum eraser reveals that a quantum wave knows if it's state will be requested during its path/life. It doesn't care about the final panel ..only the journey. It also shows that it doesn't care about time.
 
Repeats ignorance and/or fantasies about the delayed choice quantum eraser

pittsburghjoe said:
The delayed choice quantum eraser reveals ....
Click to expand...
9 September 2019 pittsburghjoe: Repeats ignorance and/or fantasies about the delayed choice quantum eraser.

What the delayed choice quantum eraser reveals is that delayed-choice experiments show that measurements of the state of photons in the present can alter events in the past. In your language - the photon definitely cares about your imaginary "final panel" (there are actually several detectors in the experiment).
 
The delayed-choice quantum eraser could also show superdeterminism or a many-worlds ontology, ie that no actual choice occurred.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom