• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

I Keep running into these videos

332nd

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
11,278
A little help please? In the past couple of weeks I keep seeing Cters post these 2 videos.

WTC 7 Video 1: WTC 7 Vid 1
WTC 7 Video 2: BOOM Building About to Blow Up

I tend to run into them after I bring up that there wr no sounds of CD charges going off.

In the second one is the typical quick cut between a cop mentioning the building is about to blow up and a shot of WTC7. (I think said cop is refering to a high school/library{?} that got a bomb threat.)

The first one I'd never seen before and I need a little help with. Granted there are only 2 bangs which is hardly enough to bring down a building the size of 7 and as we all know things tend to explode in fire.

Sorry if this has been done to death here but I couldn't find them on a searches so I figured I'd ask.
 
In the first video, it appears that the buildings have already collapsed. That's why they are all wearing respirators.

And you're right, it takes a lot more than one explosion to bring down a building.
 
A little help please? In the past couple of weeks I keep seeing Cters post these 2 videos.

WTC 7 Video 1: WTC 7 Vid 1
WTC 7 Video 2: BOOM Building About to Blow Up

I tend to run into them after I bring up that there wr no sounds of CD charges going off.

In the second one is the typical quick cut between a cop mentioning the building is about to blow up and a shot of WTC7. (I think said cop is refering to a high school/library{?} that got a bomb threat.)

The first one I'd never seen before and I need a little help with. Granted there are only 2 bangs which is hardly enough to bring down a building the size of 7 and as we all know things tend to explode in fire.

Sorry if this has been done to death here but I couldn't find them on a searches so I figured I'd ask.

The 2nd one has been discussed- although I can't specifically point to where.

The first one is new to me, but I am flabbergasted as to how they could claim it's evidence for a CD. If anything- it better explains the "explosions" that many firefighters were quoted as referring to.

CD doesn't happen over a period of several hours- it can't. And explosions in a building which is completely involved with fire is not at all unexpected.
 
The first one is falling debris, not an explosion.

The second one is a fake.

-Gumboot
 
What do you mean by fake?


The explosion sound has been added afterwards.

In fact, I believe the exact same explosion has been added to quite a number of CT videos. I guess they don't have a very extensive sound effects library.

-Gumboot
 
The explosion sound has been added afterwards.

In fact, I believe the exact same explosion has been added to quite a number of CT videos. I guess they don't have a very extensive sound effects library.

-Gumboot

Given all these videos with faked sound around, I wonder if someday there might be some confusion about what is real or not, just because 'chain of custody' documentation has been lost?
 
Given all these videos with faked sound around, I wonder if someday there might be some confusion about what is real or not, just because 'chain of custody' documentation has been lost?
I'd say that's part of the "truther" plan, but... I really don't think any of them are that smart.
 
The explosion sound has been added afterwards.

In fact, I believe the exact same explosion has been added to quite a number of CT videos. I guess they don't have a very extensive sound effects library.

-Gumboot

Is the original available somewhere?
 
Yeah it is the same with the Trinity Church footage. The orginal version is available around the traps, but a 14 second snippet has clearly been altered to create the mpression of explosions
 
Amazing. I mean- I can't see how they would justify this kind of nonsense. Are they really not CT's and they're just trying to egg people on? Sort of like the jerks that show up at protests just to start crap?

Or do they believe they're justified in doing this? Sort of like the priests who squirt oil from their Jesus statues... it gets more people to their church- and that's a good thing, right?

So the ends justify the means, right?

Or... maybe this proves they don't have the evidence, don't have the abilities, and don't know the science to really support their own position. They have to resort to the same tactics used by other charlatans, hucksters, and snake oil sellers...

What forum am I in, again?
 
:jaw-dropp The first video has been re-edited... The first time I watched it it had two distinct explosions.
 
That's it. I'm calling for an independent investigation of the Truth Movement, for possible fraud.
 
redtail perhaps if you keep running into these videos, next time you should duck. ;)
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom