I found the missing Jolt.

[FalseFlag]

False! You have to have a reason to investigate for explosives.

You're right.

Here's two reasons: building collapse and extremism.

 

[skyeagle409]

*sigh*

This is unfortunate, and it's an obvious poor choice of words. No, I'm not an expert, and that is just my opinion. They should not have used "classic".

When can I expect you to post those video time lines that I have requested from you?

 

[FalseFlag]

Or do you think resist is the same as prevent?

Close enough.

Your point is...?

 

[FalseFlag]

When can I expect you to post those video time lines that I have requested from you?

Wait for it...

 

[skyeagle409]

Who has claimed "classic CD"? Making that claim would be foolish. We suspect it was CD, and it was unlike anything we have seen before, or after 9/11.

How many steel frame buildings have collapsed due to fire alone? How many steel frame buildings were struck by B-767's before 9/11?

 

[FalseFlag]

How many steel frame buildings have collapsed due to fire alone? How many steel frame buildings were struck by B-767's before 9/11?

How many B-767's hit WTC 7?

 

[skyeagle409]

Wait for it...

Translation: FF cannot meet the video CD evidence challenge because no such evidence exist.

 

[FalseFlag]

Translation: FF cannot meet the video CD evidence challenge because no such evidence exist.

What challenge?

 

[skyeagle409]

How many B-767's hit WTC 7?

None, but American 11 was responsible for the fire that eventually caused the collapse of WTC 1, which seriously damaged WTC 7 and created a gigantic gouge on the south wall of WTC 7 that spanned several stories, which explains why WTC 7 tilted toward the south in the final seconds of its collapse.

Just thought that you would like to know that.

 

[skyeagle409]

What challenge?

Don't tell me you overlooked my challenge to post the video time lines where demolition explosions were heard. Do I need to repost those WTC videos that you have ignored accidently on purpose?

 

[skyeagle409]

What scientific tests did they perform?

How about visual, audio, seismic and lack of CD hardware evidence as test that failed to reveal any evidence of explosives?

 

[skyeagle409]

Competent "if this, then that" analysis would be to test for explosives at the beginning of the investigation.

That is not what happened.

Why would anyone waste time and money testing for explosives when no explosions occurred?

 

[FalseFlag]

Why would anyone waste time and money testing for explosives when no explosions occurred?

I already answered this.

You chose to ignore the answer, which was correct and factual. I will not do your "challenge" because you simply ignore facts. I am not wasting my time.

 

[skyeagle409]

Oh, wait, I'm not an expert, so I don't know how to ask the obvious questions.
/sarcasm

I've worked with aerospace metals to know what I am talking about.

 

[skyeagle409]

I already answered this.

You chose to ignore the answer, which was correct and factual. I will not do your "challenge" because you simply ignore facts. I am not wasting my time.

I've got the experience in metals and have experienced explosions on many occasions to know what I am talking about.

Just to let you know that I knew you would not accept the challenge and failure to accept my challenge serves to expose the weakness of Truthers and their CD claim.

 

[skyeagle409]

Who has claimed "classic CD"? Making that claim would be foolish. We suspect it was CD, and it was unlike anything we have seen before, or after 9/11.

How can you suspect CD when there was no visual, audio, seismic or hardware evidence?

Once again, knowledge would have told you that it would have been impossible to properly prepare a steel frame building for explosive demolition in secret.

 

[skyeagle409]

Why would they find a reason to investigate the fraud they were committing?

What fraud?! Why fly airplanes into buildings to hide evidence when it is much easier to remove and destroy computer hard drives and information storage? Were CIA, FBI, NSA, and other government facilities struck? No!!

You must have noticed the thousands and thousands of sheets of paper on the streets during the 9/11 attack and just think how many computers survived the attack on the Pentagon.

 

[skyeagle409]

Repeat that.

That is they key to your transition from a skeptic to a truther.

Learn it. Know it. Live it. - Brad Hamilton (Fast Times at Ridgemont High)

Just to let you know that titanium is one of the many aerospace metals that I have worked with over the years.

 

[skyeagle409]

You're right.

Here's two reasons: building collapse and extremism.

First of all, demolition explosions can be heard for miles and I've heard explosions from well over 20 miles away during B-52 bombing operations.

I specifically asked you to point out video time lines where demolition explosions were heard and you backed off from the challenge.

In addition, the way a building falls is not evidence that explosives were used. This video is a case in point, but I am also sure that you were aware of the collapse of a 21-story steel frame buildings during an earthquake.


Verinage Demolition: No Explosives Required

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwFHEoiUZ7o

 

[beachnut]

LOL.

Seriously?

What happens to the airframe of the SR-71 once it cools?

It leaks more... try to do research, instead of making up disrespectful lies.
[IMGw=500]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/21751_3389482714895_1965931585_n.jpg[/IMGw]

You have offered zero evidence to support the failed claims you support from the idiotic movement of lies, 9/11 truth, a 1984 like name for the department of overwhelming ignorance based lies.
You have no clue what the topic is, and have no useful knowledge on anything, including the SR-71