ProBonoShill
Master Poster
- Joined
- May 17, 2010
- Messages
- 2,329
This is wrong. NIST has admitted that they did not test for explosives.
It isn't NIST's job to test for explosives, but thanks for proving Myriad's point.
This is wrong. NIST has admitted that they did not test for explosives.
This is wrong. NIST has admitted that they did not test for explosives.
The problem is that they didn't hide it. Everyone can see it.
You simply choose to deny what you see (and hear).
This might be true. There are some truthers who are nutjobs. They do more harm than good.
I like how the author of the article you posted cherry-picks the claims made by the nutjobs.
What? You didn't honestly think I would miss that, did you?
That is because there was no CD evidence to hide in the first place.
Speaking of denying, when can I expect you to post those WTC video time lines that you think depicts CD explosions?
If you continue to ignore my request to post those video time lines, I will simply come to the conclusion that it is you, who is in denial.
Mr. Reality?
Wait for it...
He's also been asked to provide just one single, solitary video of the thousands taken that day that contains the telltale, ear damaging sounds of a CD, yet so far has failed miserably.
Oh and welcome to the forum.
*Friendly warning-Falseflag has a bad habit of dodging questions he can't answer.
You're right; they had nothing to do with explosives. Instead, they were just innocent people witnessing the mass murder of almost 3000 others.
Well, let's take a look at one of those "nutjob" claims, and here it is:
The collapse of the WTC buildings was the result of explosives. Even Truther's star player, Danny Jowenko, has trashed their claim the collapse of the WTC Towers was the result of demolition explosives.
What makes you qualified to make this claim?
Did anyone test for explosives?
You have to understand, FF has been destroyed here. His only reason to continue posting is for trolling purposes only.
Thank you!
Have you ever seen a chicken cause a steel-frame high-rise to collapse? I don't think CD stands for Chicken Demolition.About as hard as it would be to test for Salmonella, why don't you think they tested for that?
It was the job of anyone investigating the collapse.It isn't NIST's job to test for explosives
That is because there was no CD evidence to hide in the first place.
Speaking of denying
Proof? Let me be more clear. Credible proof?Even Truther's star player, Danny Jowenko, has trashed their claim the collapse of the WTC Towers was the result of demolition explosives.
Translation: I no longer waste my time posting facts you choose to ignore.*Friendly warning-Falseflag has a bad habit of dodging questions he can't answer.
Sorry, but I'm human. I won't be around then. You will have to ask this question to the other shape-shifting lizards.Well, the sun is due to expand and engulf the earth in a few billion years, do I have to wait until then before your so-called evidence reveals itself?
Wait for it...Why test for something for which there was no evidence for in the first place? Do they test for explosives each time a car is pulled over for speeding?
There have been many investigations already:
FBI
NYPD
NYPAPD
ATF
OSHA
FEMA
FDNY
A number of insurance companies.
Private investigations initiated by 911 families.
Wait for it...You have to understand, FF has been destroyed here.