I found the missing Jolt.

tfk said:
I'll get to your reply soon enough, Junior.

Now, you're supposed to be showing us where are the explosions in those videos that you claimed were happening in WTC7.

Why don't you do YOUR job first.

THEN, I'll be happy to answer your questions.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure this came up months ago. Not sure if it was FF at the time. Also don't recall those who questioned the statement ever getting an answer.
 
jaydeehess said:
I like the "no deformation" bit. I could have sworn that at the beginning, WTC 7 has a horizontal roofline, and that all the floors were also horizontal, yet before collapse is global in nature, (that is to refer to the time when the east and west exteriors have joined in the collapse along with the north exterior failures) both the roof line and all the floors of the north side are no longer horizontal. Maybe its an optical illusion?
Click to expand...

Yes, but that could be argued as interpretation. Tony has deliberately misrepresented what I've said; he has absolutely no defence against that particular charge of lying.

Dave
 
FalseFlag said:
tfk said:
One could see the sky thru the windows of the top floor on the eastern side of the building.
Click to expand...
Proof?
Click to expand...

You know, you’d save yourself a boatload of embarrassment if you ever bothered to read NIST’s Report.

This is a well known, well discussed phenomenon to everyone who has put in even a modest amount of time looking at the evidence.

NIST said:
NCSTAR1-9 vol 2, pg 271
After the east penthouse and a small section of the north screenwall disappeared … A bright area is evident in the windows on the 46th and 47th floors. This bright area appeared as the east penthouse disappeared into the building, likely due to sunlight shining onto the windows through the opening created in the roof of WTC 7 by the collapsing penthouse. The same bright area near the top of WTC 7 is evident in the long distance view in Figure 5–197.
Click to expand...

Do a little reading & then open your eyes.
Compare Fig 5-197 to Fig 5-195 & 5-196.
 
jaydeehess said:
I like the "no deformation" bit. I could have sworn that at the beginning, WTC 7 has a horizontal roofline, and that all the floors were also horizontal, yet before collapse is global in nature, (that is to refer to the time when the east and west exteriors have joined in the collapse along with the north exterior failures) both the roof line and all the floors of the north side are no longer horizontal. Maybe its an optical illusion?
Click to expand...

Can you link a video and do a screenshot?

I think the kink looks more pronounced when the camera-to-roofline angle is up, less so when camera-to-roofline angle is closer to horizontal. This would indicate that to a significant degree the kink is in the north-south dimension, not (just) up-down. That is due to a pull-in of the eastern part of the north face (and also, I think due to the north-east corner tipping north; although this might come a little bit later).
 
Oystein said:
Can you link a video and do a screenshot?

I think the kink looks more pronounced when the camera-to-roofline angle is up, less so when camera-to-roofline angle is closer to horizontal. This would indicate that to a significant degree the kink is in the north-south dimension, not (just) up-down. That is due to a pull-in of the eastern part of the north face (and also, I think due to the north-east corner tipping north; although this might come a little bit later).
Click to expand...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPo

At 5:30
7:35 and quite well at 8:00

However, even if this tilt is characterized as due to east section pull in, it happens before the failure of the east exterior columns. If, as is contended, all exterior columns fail at once then the roofline would fall and remain horizontal, as would all other floors. Similarly for the western section. In order for the north exterior to demonstrate all these floors tilting towards the kink, the north face exterior columns must be buckling. They must be further along in buckling nearer the kink than towards the east and west, AND, of course, the east and west face exterior columns then fail after the north face exterior columns.

No wonder the east and west fail, they've been pulled out of vertical. Due to the shorter distance between kink and east than between kink and west, the east exterior tilts more. BUT recall that the west has no SW corner columns, which will serve to have the west exterior fail at a lesser tilt than the east which has bot NE and SE corners intact.

ETA: note that some other clips in this video have been trimmed to not show the beginning of global movement.

BTW, only in 911truth does something that occurs 2/3rds across one face get said to be symmetric.
 
Last edited:
FalseFlag said:
OK.

Question.

Don't you think the people evacuating the building would have worn protective equipment? Nah. That would make too much sense.
Click to expand...
The guy looks like he works in maintenance. In fact there are statements made by these people in both the FEMA and NIST reports saying they checked the floors before leaving.

What do you see?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom