Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

No, it is 365.256. Why can't you do the simplest research?


That means nothing and avoids answering the question.

Where in my tables are the planets in the same positions?

Doesn't it take a year to complete an orbit?

 

[Dutch]

Yes.

Also HDD has nothing to do with geometry, actual orbits or dimensions. It just poorly done numerology, nothing more.

really?

 

[Paulhoff]

Doesn't it take a year to complete an orbit?

Yes, which is about 365.256 days.

Paul



You do know about that Leap-Year thing............. right..............

 

[Dutch]

Not you personally, just your claims. Unless you feel you can not live without your hyper dimensional design?

this is the third time I have to quote it The Man:

BECAUSE YOU SHOW NOTHING, NOTHING, NOTHING THAT MAKES THESE SO-CALLED PREDICTIONS THAT ANYONE ELSE CAN DUPIATE. AND I THINK ALL HERE SHOULD HOUND YOU TO DEATH WHEN THAT DATE COMES AND GOES AND NOTHING NEW HAPPENS TO HIM AND THAT IT IS JUST ANOTHER DAY OF COMA FOR HIM.

 

[Dutch]

Blue,

I understand it isn't easy to understand, but it's just not possible to stand still for a few months to analyse part of the material. Its develops eveyday, reality goes on, new patterns do emerge. They need to be identified, understood, monitored, communicated and explained while there's simultaneously so much going on that needs attention.

There's no easy way to understand this, not without personal efforts.

 

[Dutch]

THE FROZEN STORY WAS A HOAX TO GAIN ATTENTION​

Perfect , that IS some communication.

 

[Dutch]

Which is it, Dutch? Multi-dimensional geometry which requires advanced mathematics, or correlations that anyone can make without using HDD at all?

3D appearance in our reality, based on basic platonic solid geometry. orbital positions, Phi, pi, thats it basically

 

[Dutch]

Yes, which is about 365.256 days.

Paul



You do know about that Leap-Year thing............. right..............

so I talk about the same orbital position of Earth every 365.256 or 365, whatever days. same thing for the other planets

 

[Paul]

Doesn't it take a year to complete an orbit?

That is the definition of a year according to the OED:

1. a. The time occupied by the sun in its apparent passage through the signs of the zodiac, i.e. (according to modern astronomy) the period of the earth's revolution round the sun, forming a natural unit of time (nearly = 365

days); hence, a space of time approximately equal to this in any conventional practical reckoning (considered with respect to its length, without reference to its limits: cf. 3).
​

Your numbers are still incorrect, please have the good grace to accept it when you are demonstrably wrong in matters of fact.

 

[AWPrime]

3D appearance in our reality, based on basic platonic solid geometry. orbital positions, Phi, pi, thats it basically

Yet, you can't show any of this. Can you admit you merely, at best, practice numerology?

 

[Paul]

Perfect , that IS some communication.

It's technically communication in that information was being imparted, however, it was false information and had no bearing on the reality of the incident.

Claiming false information is valid just because it is information demonstrates that you have no grasp of the history you claim is so important. It also shows that any claims you make about a particular incident are immediately suspect because you have demonstrated a total lack of rigour an any of your methods.

 

[Paul]

3D appearance in our reality

What does that mean?

based on basic platonic solid geometry.

What is based on platonic solids in 3 dimensional space?

orbital positions

Of what? Around what? relative to what? Using what coordinates?

Phi, pi,

Meaningless on their own

thats it basically

If it's so basic, where are all the data you avoid posting?



I note that there was no mention of higher dimensions in that post, which part of those do you think is basic and why avoid them when explaining hyper dimensional design?

 

[Blue Mountain]

Blue,

I understand it isn't easy to understand, but it's just not possible to stand still for a few months to analyse part of the material.

If HDD is as important as you believe it to be, it will be of no use if it is not well analysed and made comprehensible to a larger audience.

If HDD is not useful, your continued failure to adequately analyse it (which is something we've been attempting to do here) blinds you to that fact.

Its develops eveyday, reality goes on, new patterns do emerge. They need to be identified, understood, monitored, communicated and explained while there's simultaneously so much going on that needs attention.

Why do these activites have to take place? Did we not as a species do just fine without knowledge of HDD for millennia? Only a tiny, tiny portion of the world's population is even aware of this, and the rest appear to be getting along just fine without it. And even us, who are aware of your work but do not accept its basis, methods, or conclusions are also doing very well.

So far, the few conclusions you've come to with HDD ("don't mess with nuclear power" and "stay out of space") are not well supported by the available evidence. Ask France if they shouldn't be messing with nuclear power: they get nearly 90% of their electricity from it.

As for staying out of space, a long line of successful missions shows otherwise.

There's no easy way to understand this, not without personal efforts.

That much I agree with. The same is true of most fields of endeavour. However, a good teacher will take the time to explain concepts students are having trouble with. Especially if those concepts are important (e.g. relativity).

 

[Paulhoff]

so I talk about the same orbital position of Earth every 365.256 or 365, whatever days. same thing for the other planets

If you can't be RIGHT ON THE MONEY with you numbers, why should we believe anything you post about your magic HDD.

Paul

 

[Dutch]

It's technically communication in that information was being imparted, however, it was false information and had no bearing on the reality of the incident.

Claiming false information is valid just because it is information demonstrates that you have no grasp of the history you claim is so important. It also shows that any claims you make about a particular incident are immediately suspect because you have demonstrated a total lack of rigour an any of your methods.

Flight 522 stands for 'running on autopilot towards nuclear event' Paul, that's what this 'research' indicated from august 2005 on.
Make sure you realize that I indicate that this crash is a Designed event, unveiling its deeper meaning with the Phi point connection with the Tunguska warning ( also intelligently Designed ) and Hirhoshima-Nagasaki.

I think you don´t understand that this is what I mean with the ´communication´that is taking place

 

[Dutch]

If HDD is as important as you believe it to be, it will be of no use if it is not well analysed and made comprehensible to a larger audience.

If HDD is not useful, your continued failure to adequately analyse it (which is something we've been attempting to do here) blinds you to that fact.

This is NOT a story that just has to be told in order to be understood.

It hits everything, in its deepest essence. Its about consciousness.

Its about willing to understand. Its about listening to intuition first. Its about taking synchronicities serious and trying to understand their meaning.

It will take personal dedication and alot of thinking in order to start to comprehend. I know that, I´ve gone through it.

 

[AWPrime]

This is NOT a story that just has to be told in order to be understood.

It hits everything, in its deepest essence. Its about consciousness.

Its about willing to understand. Its about listening to intuition first. Its about taking synchronicities serious and trying to understand their meaning.

It will take personal dedication and alot of thinking in order to start to comprehend. I know that, I´ve gone through it.

You're not actually thinking, as that requires logical thought, results of which can be fully written down.

You should rename your hobby. I suggest 'Hyper Intuition Link'.

 

[Paul]

Flight 522 stands for 'running on autopilot towards nuclear event' Paul

No, that's what you claim it stands for, a claim you will not provide data for.

that's what this 'research' indicated from august 2005 on.

How did the crash of an airliner from a non-nuclear state, probably caused by simple maintenance error, have any connection with a possible nuclear disaster?

Make sure you realize that I indicate that this crash is a Designed event

How about you explain what you mean by designed, followed by a presentation of the evidence for any such design.

I think you don´t understand that this is what I mean with the ´communication´that is taking place

It would seem that you don't understand what you are actually saying. You keep pointing to specific incidents and claiming they are 'communication' and now, when pressed, you claim the whole event was one big, vague message.

 

[Paul]

This is NOT a story that just has to be told in order to be understood.

Then how is it to be understood by anyone but you?

It hits everything, in its deepest essence. Its about consciousness.

In what sense are you using the term consciousness?

Its about willing to understand.

Understand what? You won't explain anything properly.

Its about listening to intuition first.

Intuition precludes reason.

Its about taking synchronicities serious and trying to understand their meaning.

You really shouldn't be taking advice from Jung, especially about apophenia.

It will take personal dedication and alot of thinking in order to start to comprehend.

The preceding sentences and your other responses would seem to indicate that seriously thinking about what you do is not high on the list of priorities.

 

[Blue Mountain]

This is NOT a story that just has to be told in order to be understood.

It hits everything, in its deepest essence. Its about consciousness.

(bolding mine) To me, a thesis or premise that claims to "hit everything" actually totally misses. It's like two galaxies colliding. It's not like two cars colliding where you end up with two mangled cars and debris all over the road. With galaxies, because the stars are so far apart within them, they basically just pass through each other.

Its about willing to understand. Its about listening to intuition first. Its about taking synchronicities serious and trying to understand their meaning.

Political science, epidemiology, and historical research also try to understand large and often complex events. Long ago they gave up any idea that forces outside the Earth (mostly stars and gods) influenced the course of events. It was only when they came to this realization that we began to make progress.

HDD is an attempt to re-inject outside forces into the study of human populations. That's one reason we believe it's of no use and is ultimately doomed to fail. Other reasons have been documented extensively in this thread--just search it for "logical fallacies:.

It will take personal dedication and alot of thinking in order to start to comprehend. I know that, I´ve gone through it.

So did astrologers, phrenologists, numerologists, etc. James Randi has a whole library full of books containing failed ideas and methods that attempted to understand how things work on this planet. It was the litany of failures represented by these books that sparked the skeptical movement and the development of its tool kit, the primary components of which are critical thinking and logical fallacies.