Hyper Dimensional Design

[Paulhoff]

That's my understanding of what seem to be the major underlying themes of our times yes. I know you dismiss it.

You do know Dutch, you sound just like the religious. You can't get your mind around the idea that others have a clear understanding of what you are saying and know it holds no water.

Paul

 

[Dutch]

When working with dates, what steps do you take to create a consistent decimal format that would allow calculations using different initial time zones or calendars?

Orbits of inner planet are calculated with 2 decimals. When I calculate a date, only the determined date is to be considered a +/- 1 day tineframe. This rounding does not occur during the calculation in a sense that on each orbit a +/- day deviation doesn't take place

When you have these universally formatted dates and times, why is it necessary to allow such an enormous margin of error?

+/- 1 day is not enourmous. I consider the determined date a 'peak date', you can compare it with an approaching planet and than leaving again. The 'geometrical' design or orbittal position is increasing the momentum of the identified underlying theme towards the peak date and lessening afterwards. I have limited this timeframe that could give expressions to +/- 1 day because but I aactually think this timeframe should be bigger

How do you that a hyperdimensional polyhedron even exists, let alone what it looks like?

They don't have shapes, there are only geometrically determined interference area's on an orbit. Hyper Dimensional geometry translated in to 2 dimensional geometrical correlations of an orbit.

What maths do you use to calculate interactions between three dimensional objects and those with more dimensions?

I don't know about objects, but hyper dimensional locations can be determined using Platonic Solid based geometry just like Hoagland and other researchers are doing.
What I do is applying this geometry on our perception of time. HDDesign is unique with this concept.

Are you hyperdimensional "platonic solids" fixed or free? If fixed, about what point and is it relative to anything or absolute, and if free, how do you calculate their movements and positions?

I think our reality is build on an invisible underlying Design. Every single moment in our perception of time is linked to this hidden underlying geometrical design. A hyperdimensional solid becomes visible when the events are recognized as expressions of the same underlying theme on the geometrical correlations as determined by this Hyper dimensional solid.

Events at the macrolevel do have an orientation on the calendar we use, so 9/11 and Madrid were marking the main HD solid : the Tetrahedron.

When does a spiral stop and why?

It doesn't really stop, at one point the spiral goes further inwards at the same orbittal position, marking that day on the spiral as the 'end' of the spiral, but infact spiralling inwards until eternity. The orbittal position is marked though, as end postion of the spiral on an orbit


​

Do you calculate every date on a spiral to check the dates? If not, why not and if yes, what happens if some dates have no correlations?
​

That's what I have been doing with the 911 based Phi spiral in Dutch society ever since I first discovered it ( 2005 ). This monitoring is necessarry in order to catch the subtle expressions and to identify the hidden underlying themes that are expressed.
​

 

[Dutch]

Yes. The only truly important date when it comes to the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima is the date on which it was actually used. Had the bomb been dropped on August 7 (if, for example, the Enola Gay had been grounded on the 6th), that would have been the important date. If the bomb had been dropped on August 6 but failed to detonate, then neither the date nor Hiroshima would have been important at all, despite the decision to use the bomb (whenever Truman made it) or the date on which the military orders were given, or even the date on which it was dropped.

But Blue, are you blaming it on the bomb itself? Its the result of decissions. Those with the power to do so, took the decossions to make Hirhosima possible

And if for some reason the bomb had never been dropped on Hiroshima, then Nagasaki would have been the city burned into our collective consciousness.

still the same decission

 

[AWPrime]

It is becoming increasing clear to me that dutch doesn't use a consistent method. But instead just makes up the connections as he goes along.

 

[Dutch]

I note you have yet to post even a single geometric equation here. I doubt you have a grasp of geometry beyond what is taught in high school, and no comprehension whatsoever of three-dimensional geometry, let alone four, which is the space in which HDD is purported to work.

The geometry I use is in fact very basic and simple. Platonic solids, golden mean and orbits etc. no highschool needed

In that sense you are no different from hundreds of other purveyors of woo on this planet who throw around the word quantum without knowing what it means.

I agree with you here, although I have a sens of its implications

Typically, Harmonics refers to music and sound, which does not seem to have a practical application to HDD. It also refers to a specific branch of number theory which you do not employ. The only thing "harmonic" in your system is "Two events occurred on Earth a certain number of days apart, in which time a planet happened to complete n orbits around the Sun." That is different from harmonic in the musical sense, since that works on waves and not on orbits.

I mean the inner planets in their relation to Earth

 

[Dutch]

If that's the case, why the fixation on Mercury, Venus, and Mars? You have literally a whole galaxy of objects to play with when it comes to seeing correlations to events on Earth.

because the innerplanets already do show so much indications of this hidden underlying Design.

Of course I want to look further, I want to understand the correlations with the outer planets too. I haven't had the time though to look into it yet. It will pop up someday

 

[Dutch]

In an earlier post you listed six security incidents related to Obama, not five. Which one have you forgotten about?

even better

 

[Dutch]

You do know Dutch, you sound just like the religious. You can't get your mind around the idea that others have a clear understanding of what you are saying and know it holds no water.

I am used to the idea that people dismiss this HDDesign and even that they think I'm nuts. What you think is a clear understanding will turn out to be a misjudgement. Time will tell

 

[Dutch]

It is becoming increasing clear to me that dutch doesn't use a consistent method. But instead just makes up the connections as he goes along.

You are aware of the fact that this is about the dynamic environment of multi dimensional reality and consciousness?

any idea's about a consistent method generally accepted in 3D science that is fully applicable in order to describe a multi dimensional reality?

There's much more needed than your rigid 3D based methods to come to understanding of these kind of concepts

 

[Blue Mountain]

But Blue, are you blaming it on the bomb itself? Its the result of decissions. Those with the power to do so, took the decossions to make Hirhosima possible

Even if that's the case, the date the military orders were given is not important, because the decision to use the bomb had already been made ... but unfortunately for you, not on a date you can fit into HDD.

Besides, all over this thread you point to news items of events themselves and not the decisions that lead to them as evidence of the "underlying design." Basically, anything that happens on a date that you've determined is on a time spiral becomes important. It has to, otherwise HDD falls apart. (Well, falls apart worse than it already does.)

 

[Blue Mountain]

The geometry I use is in fact very basic and simple. Platonic solids, golden mean and orbits etc. no highschool needed

There obviously isn't a three-dimensional platonic solid sitting on our solar system; we would have seen it by now. So you hide it in the fourth dimension, but you don't have the math to back that up. Is it any wonder your thesis isn't flying here?

I mean the inner planets in their relation to Earth

No, not at all. You own words put the lie to this--every time I point out that the relation of the inner planets' orbits with respect to the Earth doesn't match up with the occurrence of events, you say the orbital positions don't matter. So you don't have any harmonics (at least not in the physical or mathematical sense), nor do you have any relationships with respect to the orbital mechanics.

The term for this in English is "wild goose chase".

 

[Blue Mountain]

even better

I asked you which one you had forgotten about.

In effect, you dismissed my post. You did not appear to do any checking to determine if I was right or wrong, and given my track record over the last couple of pages the idea I was wrong might have worked in your favour

So I'll ask a more detailed question:

In an recent post in this thread, you mentioned there were five hits in a row related to events where there was an issue with Barack Obama's security. Can you list these five? In an earlier post, you listed six such events. Can you list these six, and explain what happened to cause you to miss one?

 

[Blue Mountain]

It is becoming increasing clear to me that dutch doesn't use a consistent method. But instead just makes up the connections as he goes along.

Earlier I referred to Hyper Dimensional Design as the 21st century equivalent of a Victorian parlour game. I believe the analogy is apt.

 

[Paul]

Orbits of inner planet are calculated with 2 decimals. When I calculate a date, only the determined date is to be considered a +/- 1 day tineframe. This rounding does not occur during the calculation in a sense that on each orbit a +/- day deviation doesn't take place

I was referring to the dates, on earth, on which events happen; how do you standardise these in order to use them in calculations?

What does orbits calculated to 2 decimals mean? The rest of that sentence does not make sense.

+/- 1 day is not enourmous.

When using events that can be accurately timed to the minute, or even second, it is.

I consider the determined date a 'peak date', you can compare it with an approaching planet and than leaving again.

What if, for example, Mars is at it's furthest points from earth on your peak date? It will be approaching for some time.

What reason do you have to consider it a peak and not a well defined singular event?

The 'geometrical' design or orbittal position is increasing the momentum of the identified underlying theme towards the peak date and lessening afterwards.

How do you determine the extent of influence of any particular planetary orbit; there will always be planets approaching or receding, why is one more important than the other 2?

I have limited this timeframe that could give expressions to +/- 1 day because but I aactually think this timeframe should be bigger

Why, that's just an arbitrary number and a guess.

 

[dafydd]

So what about the billions of people that don't use the same calendar as you?

Answer please.

 

[dafydd]

GodMark2,

the keydates on the 2007 timeline are somehow connected to the already determined HD dates, marker events that already happened or ongoing timecoded patterns

I have a focus on the macro level, its just mnot possible to put everything that happens into perspective

What does 'I have focus on the macro level' mean. Pure gibberish I'll bet.

 

[dafydd]

Fnord. I hate to say this, but you are just using "argument from authority" here, specially in your first two points and the fifth. Thats useless. People here needs to present evidence, thats all, you can be a 10 years old boy on highschool or a 70 years woman with no education. Evidence its all that matter.

That said, your 3 and 4 are useful, to a point. Specially 4 which would show the kind of brain we are dealing with.[/QU

Dutch has a brain?

 

[dafydd]

Dutch, as a fellow countryman I say: "Blijf uit de koffieshops!"

And as for dates having *any* meaning...

Remember that the designation of the years is because Dionysius Exiguus (in English known as Denis the Little) chose them to be that way. He more or less guestimated when the year 0 should be.

And there is a lot of other nonsense going on with how our dates are constructed, so, leave it already.

Yes,he probably found the 'Dutch phi spiral' in a koffieshop.That genetically engineered Dutch skunk does scramble your brain. He's a good laugh though,this is entertaining.I wonder,does he realise how big an eejit he is making of himself here?

 

[dafydd]

Dutch should move to Western Montana, he’ll fit right in.

Paul

Munchkinland would be the best place for him.

 

[AWPrime]

any idea's about a consistent method generally accepted in 3D science that is fully applicable in order to describe a multi dimensional reality?

There's much more needed than your rigid 3D based methods to come to understanding of these kind of concepts

And yet calculations involving 10+ dimensions are accepted and created for string theory and such. So involving more then 3 dimensions isn't an excuse to not show the needed calculations.

But we already know that you are incapable of such acts of math. You keep throwing words around you don't know the meaning of such as: dimensional, harmonics, platonic solids, geometrical, etc.

You even combine the words into such monstrosities such as 'Hyper Dimensional geometry', which in your case becomes nothing more then technobabble. And I am not impressed by your technobabble.