Hyper Dimensional Design

[dafydd]

let's start with the latest one, the 4 lunar impact probes. There are many more examples, even in this thread here at JREF, but because you seem to be short of memory and that you seem to dismiss all other examples of this very same Pi based Design that has been discussed here in this thread, we will focus on the latest one, right?

What is so amazing about planned missions impacting the Moon? It's old news. Why are you so excited about them?

 

[Blue Mountain]

Err, Dutch, have you seen this?

By the way, Dutch, since you're here and answering questions:

All right, you've mentioned 2 September 2004, 2 April 2005 (death of Pope John Paul II), 25 June 2009 (death of Michael Jackson), 11 February 2010 (Bill Clinton's heart problems), 25 June 2013 (non-death of Nelson Mandela), and 24 December 2013. But as usual you utterly fail to produce the mathematics behind these dates, despite continually being asked to do so.

I'd prefer to see the appropriate mathematics in this thread; not some hand-waving about "read all about it on my forum."

 

[dafydd]

He has no mathematics behind the dates.

 

[Orphia Nay]

Posting an 'expectation' in december 2012 based on a lunar impact probe entering lunar orbit and finfing another lunar impact probe entering lunar orbit on the anticipated future timeframe doesn't sound old new to me.

It had yet to occur back in 2012, materializing 9 months later, so what about old news? It's future 'news'

This coincidence is totally boring and means zero, zilch, nothing, nada.

 

[Little 10 Toes]

Two words: Sun King

 

[Sideroxylon]

He has no mathematics behind the dates.

He plucks the predictions from his date.

 

[AdMan]

He plucks the predictions from his date.

More likely from a nearby orifice.

 

[dafydd]

In lieu of an actual answer from Dutch, does anybody know why this run of the mill lunar impact is of such Earth-shaking significance? I know that he linked it to the deaths of Mandela and Clinton, but they are still alive. HDD= Hopeless Dutch Delusion.

 

[The Man]

In lieu of an actual answer from Dutch, does anybody know why this run of the mill lunar impact is of such Earth-shaking significance? I know that he linked it to the deaths of Mandela and Clinton, but they are still alive. HDD= Hopeless Dutch Delusion.

Of course...


INTUITION!!!!!!!


Dutch has asserted many times that it is his intuitive inclinations that lead him to his timelines, dates and the relevance of his post-dicted events. Further he seems to feel that other should also just get or take the same intuitive significance from his pontifications. Saying to some that such might be "a bridge too far......or are you just deliberately playing stupid?" and referring another here as I think a professional debunker.

 

[dafydd]

And what does Dutch's intuition tell him about these perfectly ordinary lunar impacts?

 

[The Man]

And what does Dutch's intuition tell him about these perfectly ordinary lunar impacts?

As Dutch asserts himself...

<DDH snip>

It's future 'news'

And upon reaching that future Dutch will once more reach for the news and let his intuition run rough shod over him again.

 

[Wolrab]

All brought to us by Vary-pi ™! Need help shoehorning numbers to fit intuitive nonsense? Vary-pi™ is the answer! Rounds up, down, and all around! Multiples, exponents, fractions, and any amount of decimal places to get you the number you so desperately need to feed your hyper dimensional delusions!

 

[Orphia Nay]

All brought to us by Vary-pi ™! Need help shoehorning numbers to fit intuitive nonsense? Vary-pi™ is the answer! Rounds up, down, and all around! Multiples, exponents, fractions, and any amount of decimal places to get you the number you so desperately need to feed your hyper dimensional delusions!

 

[Reality Check]

Dutch: Where is your explanation of "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" here

Just read this thread from the beginning and you will find it, it hass been explained several times so.

That is a rather dumb demand to read over 6600 posts, Dutch!

But let us see where you have explained "Tetrahedron at macrolevel" in your posts containing these words:
10th September 2008: Lots of fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
12th September 2008: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
19th September 2008: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
20th September 2008: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
27th September 2008: A deluge of delusions !
5th October 2008: A bigger deluge of delusions !
10th October 2008: Yet more delusions.
12th October 2008: Now you are trusting deluded people ("Hoagland and others).
25th October 2008: A paranoid conspiracy theory and the delusion that it is related to HDDesign.
30th October 2008: Repeating the paranoid conspiracy theory and more word salad.
31st January 2009: So much woo in that enormous post, Dutch .
20th February 2009: What looks like a lie abut the use of platonic solids on HDDesign being explained in this forum.
23rd February 2009: More HDDesign delusions without explanation.
8th March 2009: More HDDesign delusions without explanation. This time throwing in the mythical "end of the Mayan calendar" !
14th March 2009: No explanation, Dutch.
13th April 2009: No explanation, Dutch.
30th April 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
9th July 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
9th July 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
7th August 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
29th August 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch. This includes the "exit of the Sun King" gibberish.
20th September 2009: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch. This includes the Mayan calendar insanity.
12th December 2009: "Waves of change" fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
18th June 2010: No explanation, Dutch.
18th June 2010: No explanation, Dutch.
1st January 2011: More fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
27th June 2011: A fanatsy about the Madrid bombing- no explanation, Dutch.
2nd August 2011: Tons of fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
14th March 2012: More HDDesign fantasies - no explanation, Dutch.
26th October 2013: No explanation, Dutch.

This raises a new question:
Dutch: Where is your explanation of "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" in this thread?
First asked 4 November 2013 - 0 days and counting.


You need to have explained the following in enough detail that anyone can understand (and maybe duplicate) what you are doing with:

• HD Design.
• Tetrahedrons in HD Design.
• "macrolevel" in Tetrahedrons in HD Design.

Dutch: What does "HD Tetrahedron at macrolevel" mean?
First asked 29th October 2013 - 6 days and counting.
That really should be 1881 days since that was the first unexplained mention and you have never explained it as far as I can see.

 

[Reality Check]

Was "HDDesign is not about predictions" a lie, Dutch

You don't seem to understand the difference between a space probe entering lunar orbit and an actual lunar impact.

I understand the difference.
You obviously do not since the missions you mention were not "actual lunar impacts". They were space probes entering lunar orbit so that they can study the Moon. Later they were redirected to impact the Moon.
Offhand I can think of no actual lunar impact by spacecraft that did not orbit the Moon.

Was "HDDesign is not about predictions" a lie, Dutch?
Because an "anticipation" implies an prediction.

Writing an "anticipation" in December 2012 that Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (launched September 7, 2013) would be impacted on the Moon is insanely ridiculous because that was the plan for LADEE probably since its inception in February 2008. It was public knowledge that LADEE would impact the Moon and even the date was known. Some simple arithmetic for you, Dutch :

LADEE launched on September 7, 2013.
As I have mentioned several times before: Expected mission duration = 100 days.
September 7, 2013 + 100 days = 16 December 2013.

​

I expect the idiotic act of making up a number and adding it to a random date in the past to get 16 December 2013 is about to happen, Dutch .

 

[Reality Check]

Posting an 'expectation' in december 2012 based on a lunar impact probe entering lunar orbit and finfing another lunar impact probe entering lunar orbit on the anticipated future timeframe doesn't sound old new to me.

The 'expectation' sounds ridiculous to anyone who can think, Dutch:

• There are no "lunar impact probes". The impacts of lunar study probes are secondary to the main mission of ... studying the Moon !
• The LADEE probe's date to enter lunar orbit was widely known.
• The LADEE probe was widely known to end up with an impact.
• Lunar study missions in general are impacted into the Moon if only to clear the orbits.

There is also a fantasy about some imagined "anticipated future timeframe".

 

[Reality Check]

Dutch: Show how you worked out a "grand cross" on December 26 2004

and the mathematical mistake is? Be specific or don't post your irrelevant remarks

The real mistake is the stupidity of using astrology's "Grand Cross" term in a rather ignorant attempt at astronomy.
The second mistake is not defining what your "grand cross" actually is. The vague "orbital grand cross in HDdesign is created on Earth's orbital positions only" sounds like woo.

The mathematical mistake is the basic high school one of not showing how you work out this "grand cross".

Another mathematical mistake is that there are an infinite number of these "grand crosses" - just pick any 4 points on Earth's orbit that are 3 months apart and you will get "crosses". So you have to cherry pick events that are seconds apart or even milliseconds apart .

For example on 2nd October 2009

Where did you get your information about a grand cross on December 26 2004?

Dutch:
Show how you worked out a "grand cross" on December 26 2004
First asked 2nd October 2009 - 1494 and waiting (but it will not take you long to find where you answered this question will it, Dutch?).

Be specific or don't post your irrelevant remarks, Dutch!

 

[Hans]

Ah it is time for my check in on Dutch.

Oh my,,,,,,,,,,,,lets see

Dutch still making stuff up....CHECK

Other people crushing him under intelligent questions and comments - yeap the same stuff as 7 years ago.......... CHECK

No change

Everybody have FUN now!

 

[Dutch]

What is so amazing about planned missions impacting the Moon? It's old news. Why are you so excited about them?

The point is, that they are expressing this very same Pi based Design that has been discussed here before, with an pre-determined expected expression 9 months in advance. What do you mean with old news?

 

[dafydd]

The point is, that they are expressing this very same Pi based Design that has been discussed here before, with an pre-determined expected expression 9 months in advance. What do you mean with old news?

NASA launched them! Anybody could predict what would happen to them.