Hyper Dimensional Design

[dafydd]

The answer is deleted but you can find it here:

http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=20578&mforum=hddesign#20578

Your only follower dreemz is well named. Witness this load of bollocks.

''It means that we are living in the times that the human mind can start to understand that we are experiencing our lives in a reality that is part of a multi-dimensional expression of consciousness......and the fact that we can understand that, we have to consider what it means to us and what we will do with it. We have to become aware of our own 'contribution' to multi-dimensional expression of consciousness and there's no scientist or church who will take over your own responsibility in relation to the evolution of consciousness. We are experiencing it here in our limited perception and we are the only ones who are ultimately responsible for what happens here...''

What about Mandela? Why can't you admit that you were wrong?

 

[Daylightstar]

The answer is deleted but you can find it here:
...

You 'heard' about it while at work (wasting your employer's time) and then you started retrofitting to something which you can also not substantiate and are now trying to pass it of as a prediction. Which of course it wasn't.
Technically it's a case of unsubstantiated Claim upon unsubstantiated claim, yes.

Your typical m.o.

 

[Dutch]

Your only follower dreemz is well named. Witness this load of bollocks.

''It means that we are living in the times that the human mind can start to understand that we are experiencing our lives in a reality that is part of a multi-dimensional expression of consciousness......and the fact that we can understand that, we have to consider what it means to us and what we will do with it. We have to become aware of our own 'contribution' to multi-dimensional expression of consciousness and there's no scientist or church who will take over your own responsibility in relation to the evolution of consciousness. We are experiencing it here in our limited perception and we are the only ones who are ultimately responsible for what happens here...''

What about Mandela? Why can't you admit that you were wrong?

Its oke to try to insult me but keep other people out of this discussion here, she's not involved in any way.

What about Mandela? I have already given an answer here. His health issue was a big theme during the Grand cross orbital position. I think I've said that I expect him to exit at Grand Cross orbital position yes. I hope he will skipp alot of hits on that pattern

 

[Dutch]

You 'heard' about it while at work (wasting your employer's time) and then you started retrofitting to something which you can also not substantiate and are now trying to pass it of as a prediction. Which of course it wasn't.
Technically it's a case of unsubstantiated Claim upon unsubstantiated claim, yes.

Your typical m.o.

Are you talking about the twin Grail impacts here in relation to Deep Impact on comet Tempel 1? Same underlying Design as with Smart 1, Chandrayaan, LCROSS/Centaur and Ladee yes. Emerging instantly in this HDDesign material after a synchronicity and first intuitive thoughts. Showing these intelligent correlations instantly, when HDDesign has been applied

 

[Dutch]

Responding again to the same post and still getting it wrong.

In your second also very poor attempt to clarify the 'funny' remark, you should have inserted "in my opinion" after "funny".
Or stated that at least you thought it was funny.

Everyone here realizes that you judged someone to be funny from the context of your HDDelusion.
Which negates your statement of someone being funny.

Entirely.

I see you still don't understand that this guys remarks about these lunar impact missions were in fact completely irrelevant. He took other issues as if it was part of the given Design and he doubted Centaur being an impact on the moon. In fact his comments had nothing to do with what I stated. You should understand that or you aren't capable enough

 

[Dutch]

Responding again to the same post and still getting it wrong.

In your second also very poor attempt to clarify the 'funny' remark, you should have inserted "in my opinion" after "funny".
Or stated that at least you thought it was funny.

Everyone here realizes that you judged someone to be funny from the context of your HDDelusion.
Which negates your statement of someone being funny.

Entirely.

Don't you think its funny when somebody wants to debunk an argument by putting other events to support his claim? that's ridiculous, even you could know that

With other events I mean the actual impacts of Smart 1 and Ladee he uses to debunk the given intelligent correlations which are based on entering lunar orbit entry instead of lunar impact. i suppose you understand this difference

 

[Dutch]

The only place that this "Grand Cross orbital position" exists is in Dutch's imagination.

That remains to be seen. Underlying themes on this pattern are 'identified' as San Adreas EQ and exit of Sun King. Subtle preferably

 

[Dutch]

Explain "Grand Cross orbital position" and relate it to you getting Mandela's death wrong without resorting to further gibberish.

Well, there's a seperate thread in the HDDesign material dedicated to this Grand Cross timecoded pattern. I would say, give it a look. If I post from it, it will be deleted so..you know where to find it I suppose ( main HDDesign forum)

 

[Dutch]

Bollocks. How does this 'grand cross' affect a person's health? What is the mechanism? Anyway, your 'grand cross' said he was going to die. Stop this delusional nonsense and find another hobby.

I don't think I have ever used the word affect. That's your rigid interpretation. You don't seem to understand that things just don't happen at random, but that there's an hidden underlying Design. I talk about macro level in this case.

 

[Blue Mountain]

By the way, Dutch, since you're here and answering questions:

All right, you've mentioned 2 September 2004, 2 April 2005 (death of Pope John Paul II), 25 June 2009 (death of Michael Jackson), 11 February 2010 (Bill Clinton's heart problems), 25 June 2013 (non-death of Nelson Mandela), and 24 December 2013. But as usual you utterly fail to produce the mathematics behind these dates, despite continually being asked to do so.

I'd prefer to see the appropriate mathematics in this thread; not some hand-waving about "read all about it on my forum."

 

[Orphia Nay]

That remains to be seen. Underlying themes on this pattern are 'identified' as San Adreas EQ and exit of Sun King. Subtle preferably

Earthquakes and tremors happen every day.

Famous people have health issues every day.

HDD is utter tripe.

 

[Orphia Nay]

http://hddesign.forumup.nl/viewtopic.php?p=20220&mforum=hddesign#20220

Mandela "will pass away during Grand Cross as a Sun King" - Dutch, June 23, 2013.

FAIL.

 

[Sideroxylon]

Well, there's a seperate thread in the HDDesign material dedicated to this Grand Cross timecoded pattern. I would say, give it a look. If I post from it, it will be deleted so..you know where to find it I suppose ( main HDDesign forum)

No, you explain to me how this idea of yours excuses your failure when you predicted Mandela's death. I am not asking for a load of copy and paste from your website. I am asking for your explanation.

 

[dafydd]

I don't think I have ever used the word affect. That's your rigid interpretation. You don't seem to understand that things just don't happen at random, but that there's an hidden underlying Design. I talk about macro level in this case.

In the extremely remote possibility that there is a design, who is the designer? Are you a god botherer?

 

[dafydd]

That remains to be seen. Underlying themes on this pattern are 'identified' as San Adreas EQ and exit of Sun King. Subtle preferably

Bollocks. Mandela is still alive and predicting earthquakes in the San Andreas fault is not very impressive. What about Mandela? According to your 'Grand Cross' he should be dead.

 

[dafydd]

. I think I've said that I expect him to exit at Grand Cross orbital position yes. I hope he will skipp alot of hits on that pattern

Date please. Predicting the death of a man in his nineties is not very impressive either. Give us the exact date, according to your imaginary 'Grand Cross'.

 

[AdMan]

Dutch, it's been nearly seven years since you started this thread--can you let us know whom you have convinced of your theories so far?

Why do you think I'm here? the biggest progress can be made with the most rigid mindsets.

It doesn't have to be in this forum, which you apparently believe is populated by "the most rigid mindsets."

Whom have you convinced of your beliefs elsewhere? I'm sure if you told us of all the great minds you've brought to your camp, we'd be bowled over.

So who is it? Who has been smart enough to recognize the genius in your theories?

Anyone? Bueller?

 

[dafydd]

read my post above. His remarks were funny, because his comments are not about the given events and incorrect even ( centaur).
For you it wouldn't make any difference perhaps, but for me it does

Centaur? Half man, half horse, with a license to crap in the street?

 

[Orphia Nay]

In the extremely remote possibility that there is a design, who is the designer? Are you a god botherer?

It appears to me that the "design" is the designer. Such perfect circular reasoning.

 

[Daylightstar]

Are you talking about the twin Grail impacts here in relation to Deep Impact on comet Tempel 1? Same underlying Design as with Smart 1, Chandrayaan, LCROSS/Centaur and Ladee yes. Emerging instantly in this HDDesign material after a synchronicity and first intuitive thoughts. Showing these intelligent correlations instantly, when HDDesign has been applied

"Retrofitting" is much shorter.