Hyper Dimensional Design

[Daylightstar]

you can call me, skype perhaps?...

Why the hell would I want to call you?

...
Hub was already retired back in '99. I don't even know if he is still alive today, you guys came up with this suddenly.
I have urged Hub to get a puter because he is an oldfashioned guy who writes with a typewriter.
I have established a 'dutch language' especially for him years ago, but he seems to be unable to do so. Today he would be in his seventies I guess.

Since 1999 we have written some letters and ocasionally a phonecall, last one a few years ago, so..

I really don't care about all that.

Where does the guy describe a meeting he had with you? Apparently not in the book you claimed he did, now you claim a 'follow up' publication.
Which 'follow up' publication would that be? Do you have a link?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8182307&postcount=5330
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8182321&postcount=5332

 

[dafydd]

Well, you might be the living evolutionary evidence of an ape becoming a human, but you can wait billions of years for a chimp to go to the moon

unless we alter him

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0831_050831_chimp_genes.html

He was wrong about human DNA and ape DNA. Everything in his very funny book is wrong.

 

[Wolrab]

April 13, 2012

Well the time is almost here. Friday the thirteenth is the last day I predicted something associated with the landing of the last shuttle will occur. I think I have a hit, but will save it for that fated day.

Plastic Dimensional Physics Rules!

 

[Wolrab]

North Korean rocket failure. I call awesome hit. What say Dutch? HDD has never had such a series of dead balls on accurate hits.

 

[realpaladin]

North Korean rocket failure. I call awesome hit. What say Dutch? HDD has never had such a series of dead balls on accurate hits.

I want to become a fully learned acolyte of Plastic Dimensional Physics!

Do you have a leaflet with a few buzzwords so I can totally invent my own version of it and point back to those heady days when we met on this board?

It does not matter that in my work sometimes people's lives depend on my sanity: Hey, that is the sacrifice of progress!

 

[dafydd]

North Korean rocket failure. I call awesome hit. What say Dutch? HDD has never had such a series of dead balls on accurate hits.

Dutch has stated here that HDD is not about predicting future events. What HDD actually does is a mystery, apart from wasting Dutch's time.

 

[Dutch]

What’s wrong with you? Who has said you’ve “ventilated” or even aired “an opinion about the validity of his theories”? Just because your Dimensional Design Hype is only you airing your opinions (and there are plenty of holes in it for it to be well ventilated already) that does not preclude anyone from discussing relevant materials not directly related to or dependent upon your opinions of them, aired or not.

That’s it.

man, look at the comments that are posted here....

In a sense, the story of Hub is about how we wet...

I just wanted to give Hub a platform on HDDesign forum, I've added a Dutch language section especially for him years ago, in which he could explain his ideas and start discussions about it in a decent way....

Unfortunately he's not a puter guy, he just doesn't use a computer at all.

He cannot defend himself here.....

I'm interested in the guy because of his ideas that seem to include consciousness into science...

But that's not the issue here, it is about how we've met.

 

[Dutch]

Or I might actually be an ape, like everyone else.

I know you have trouble with many basic principles, but please try to understand this: People, orangutans, gorillas and chimpanzees are apes, apes are primates, various evolutionary splits occurred over the last 65 million years leading to various orders, genera and species but not to modern chimpanzees sprouting helmets and turning into space monkeys.*

So you think you are the living example of Darwin's theory?

 

[Dutch]

Why the hell would I want to call you?

Sorry?

Why don't we google you and call you? Because you might as well provide an answer here!

 

[Dutch]

I really don't care about all that.

Where does the guy describe a meeting he had with you? Apparently not in the book you claimed he did, now you claim a 'follow up' publication.
Which 'follow up' publication would that be? Do you have a link?

When I first met him, he described his work and told me about his book he had just published ( 1999 ). In our second meeting soon afterwards he asked me if I had a problem if he would mention our meeting as an example in a next publication he was working on, as he told me he had already done so. period.

 

[Dutch]

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0831_050831_chimp_genes.html

He was wrong about human DNA and ape DNA. Everything in his very funny book is wrong.

Well, talk to him if you feel the need

 

[dafydd]

Well, talk to him if you feel the need

I don't. He is wrong about DNA.

 

[dafydd]

So you think you are the living example of Darwin's theory?

Yes,and so are you, despite what your hero says.

 

[Paul]

So you think you are the living example of Darwin's theory?

Spit it out man! Either you have something to say about evolution or not, making idiotic responses only serves to further confuse the issue.

 

[Daylightstar]

..., it is about how we've met.

To which you received an answer:

And you lied about that.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8178071&postcount=5285

We could refer to that lie as the BUM lie.

 

[Daylightstar]

Sorry?

Yes, you should be. For posting the answer yourself.

 

[Dutch]

Spit it out man! Either you have something to say about evolution or not, making idiotic responses only serves to further confuse the issue.

A pure biological evolution ( Darwin) without incorporation of consciousness itself, does not explain why we are here now in the way are experiencing our reality. That's an opinion, if I could prove it we are done here

 

[Dutch]

Yes,and so are you, despite what your hero says.

In a sense, you are my hero, like everybode else

 

[Daylightstar]

When I first met him, he described his work and told me about his book he had just published ( 1999 ). In our second meeting soon afterwards he asked me if I had a problem if he would mention our meeting as an example in a next publication he was working on, as he told me he had already done so. period.

... He wrote a book which has been published in Dutch.. In the book he mentions our coincidental meeting as a supportive example of his theories.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8182307&postcount=5330

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8182323&postcount=5333

Right right, sure. Which 'follow up' publication would that be? Do you have a link?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8183009&postcount=5341

...
Where does the guy describe a meeting he had with you? Apparently not in the book you claimed he did, now you claim a 'follow up' publication.
Which 'follow up' publication would that be? Do you have a link?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8182307&postcount=5330
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8182321&postcount=5332

 

[Dutch]

To which you received an answer:

No, it's true. He used our meeting in a publication he was working on and asked if I had a problem with that. period.