Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
...
There's no way to have a normal discussion this way. ...
Or in other words, again:
Translation: You refuse to uncritically accept and talk about my 'intuitions' as if they are real.


... I am accused of alot of things ..
Won't you quickly list them for us? You know, for reference.

... I can't afford to waste too much time. ...
You have afforded yourself many years of time wasting already, even from your own point of view. Just look at your 365/360 debacle where you have been wrong from the very beginning, as pointed out by DarbyII.

On another note, when you make posts like:
... 1 am and kids are early....
... you are decidedly wasting time. Especially since you are not offering people anything substantial or real.

... I'm going back to the basics of HDDesign 'research'. ...

Ah yes, the basics:
Degrees times degrees = days. Some 'research' that is. If only you had functional intuition ....


...stay tuned
Obsessive Compulsive.
 
It's not about what I want, its about what I recognize as totally unexpectable if our reality would really be as random as it initially appears to us. It can happen once or twice or a few times, but if you strumble on these 'coincidences' repeatedly, consistently and continuously, than you really have to start to think about how this could be possible.

It is possible, once again, because it is simply what you want.


You choose to ignore and not to try if for yourself. I cannot convince you, I know that, you can only be 'touched' by this underlying intelligence if you discover it yourselves.

Try to stop just ‘touching’ yourself and you may find the only thing unintelligently underlying all of this is just you and your own inclinations.
 
The Man:



Are you telling me that you are going to sit and wait until somebody is going to tell you: YES WE HAVE.....more dimensions.

Once again missing the point, how many dimensions we have is irrelevant to you. You only use one.
When that moment comes, you are going to start to think about its implications?

People have been doing that for a very long time; please try to learn about what you want to discuss the ‘implications' of..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Spacetime_dimensionality.svg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime#Privileged_character_of_3.2B1_spacetime

You probably won't live long enough.
I already have as have you, the difference is I’ve investigated those ‘implications’.
The indications are omnipresent and overwhelming but you can still choose to ignore. Safe right? it's a waste of opportunities this rigid mindset

You are nether “omnipresent” nor “overwhelming” nor is your ‘intuition’. You have yet to acknowledge the obvious “omnipresent and overwhelming” fact that this is all just you.
 
The Man:



What if you are wrong and our dimensions aren't independent at all?
It is there independence (specifically in direction) that makes them different dimensions.
What about consciousness?

What about it? Please learn to recognize the activities of your consciousness as opposed to pretending it is just some ‘extra-dimensional’ consciousness.
Our perception of time is the ONLY key if we want to try to unravel this possible 'independence' . It's in this field that the hidden underlying intelligent correlations show up.
No, again thy show up only in your mind and at your bequest as evidenced by the requirement of your ‘intuition’, the one thing your (certainly not “our”) perception of time is never independent of is you Dutch. Again please learn how consciousness functions and its tendency to deceive itself.
 
Dare to explain how the geometrical determined positions on an orbit are inconsistent with our system of dates, regardless which calendar you use?

Dare to explain exactly how those “positions on an orbit” are, well, geometrically “determined”?
 
Last edited:
stay tuned

It looks like you pick a a few days where "something" will happen and then you scan the news headlines for those days to find "something." The problem is that something is always happening because you pick very mundane things. I guarantee you that if you pick a range of days where you predict that NOTHING will happen you will find the same **** happening in the news as the days where you predict something will happen. Your theory, thus has zero predictive value.
 
It looks like you pick a a few days where "something" will happen and then you scan the news headlines for those days to find "something." The problem is that something is always happening because you pick very mundane things. I guarantee you that if you pick a range of days where you predict that NOTHING will happen you will find the same **** happening in the news as the days where you predict something will happen. Your theory, thus has zero predictive value.

Not only that, there was one instance (a couple or so years ago) where one of Dutch’s “timelines” was related (by him) to an upcoming launch of the space shuttle. Unfortunately that launch was delayed however that non-event (no launch) was cited as the event prescribed by his timeline. So to his HDD nothing happening is the same as something happening. It has no power (predictive or otherwise) other than just to feed his ego.
 
Some of you are deliberately obstructing me right?
You are the largest obstruction here, Dutch. Many, many years ago I asked you outline your whole process, to include charts graphs and math so we could independantly verify what results you get. You have consistently refused. I can only imagine this is because you have no set process, and instead pull predictions from some random orifice and then try to hide it using your magic system whose only proficiency is in always having the exact excuse you need, when you need it.

There's no way to have a normal discussion this way. I am accused of alot of things while it appears to be acceptable here that others do behave in such manner.
Years and years, Dutch. If you had any intention whatsoever in rationally discussing your hypothesis, you would have been productive and forthright from the start. You have not.

Either way some are playing games or they are plain stupid.
There's a game going on here, to be sure. And we're not the ones playing. And you're the only one who doesn't see the points don't matter anywhere.

I can't afford to waste too much time.
Sure you can. We all can and have. How many years has it been, Dutch, since you were asked to outline your process and you refuse?

I'm going back to the basics of HDDesign 'research'.
You don't have any basics. If you do, you refuse to outline them for the rest of us.

Practically that means being 'available'

stay tuned
Stay tuned for another five years of the exact same thing. Smoke, mirrors, word salad, failed predictions, excuses, mass redefinition of common terms, and refusal to outline your prediction process so others can independently check your results.
 
Mister Earl,

Our OP "host" likes to liken himself to Albert Einstein via a quote from Einstein as his tag line. Fine (also +10 pts on the Baez Crackpot Index for comparing himself to Albert Einstein). It is out of context and does not actually associate itself with Dutch's "methodology". So, I'll take another out of context Einstein quote and associate it with Dutch (and in this case it is actually conformal to the context):

"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."

Enough said. And now can we finally put this thread to bed?
 
Last edited:
Man with stupid ideas says something stupid; that'll certainly help us understand HDD.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom