Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sorry to hear that. ;)
I'm sorry, you're sorry, I'm sorry you're sorry, you're probably sorry I'm sorry you're sorry, if only Dutch were sorry in a repentant way rather that the usual wretched, poor, useless, pitiful way.
 
I'm sorry, you're sorry, I'm sorry you're sorry, you're probably sorry I'm sorry you're sorry, if only Dutch were sorry in a repentant way rather that the usual wretched, poor, useless, pitiful way.

Yes, I'm very sorry that you're sorry.
I'm sorry to say that Dutch will likely never be sorry.


Sorry.
 
You are not The Man

An assertion patently false, as demonstrated by what you quoted.

That's whatI mean, really examining. Darby thought to get rid of it with a few posts. I dont know what has happened, but the thread seems to be disappeared. That would be easy, right?

What, “really examining”? Yes , very easy. Any chance of you starting anytime soon?

No man, these are seperate things. The elements of HDDesign are intelligent. Pattern recognition is based on intuition and synchronicities in the first place

Once again misaddressing your response to quoted material, please try harder, Dutch, as you are not demonstrating any intelligence thusly.


to mankind, because it would be preferable to learn our lessons at a subtle level

“our lessons”? No, just your lessons Dutch something you have yet to learn subtly or otherwise.
 
I think you have given me an answer here to what I have been asking myself, and posted in the HDDesign material, why the calculations seems to be 3 days off on numerous occasions.

Thank you Darby, this is your first good contribution.
The geometry still fits

It has no consequences for orbital positions of the planets , the use of Phi and Pi in Earthdays. The orientation points of the HD platonic solids are slightly different, but still within the peak timeframe.

I really have been amazed to seem 3 days off in the opast, and I have been posting about this amazement, but now I understand

No Dutch the geometry doesn’t “fit”, geometry is one of those lessons you still need to learn. The Earth’s orbit is elliptical not circular. A tetrahedron is a four sided three dimensional object. You however have simply inserted your four “Tetrahedron” “( originating from another dimension!)” “intersection points” at intervals of degrees (for dates) at your own choosing.


actually, its based on earthdays

We know.

You only calculate in terms of time and the Earth never returns to any of the same locations in time it was before. So not only do you not use the Earths orbit (which is not circular), a “Tetrahedron” or any geometrical “intersection” of them. You calculate entirely in singular linear dimension (time) based on arbitrary aspects simply of your own choosing and yet somehow this results in your “amazement”.
 
Thanks, The Man! :)

Yes, there's no need to celebrate the thread's birthday. It seems like it's been going forever, so what's another year of Dutch's evasions?
 
Dutch, one of the major issues I have with HDD is the fact it's indistinguishable from astrology and tarot cards. You put up a bunch of mumbo-jumbo, make predictions (and you do make predictions), then after the event you shoehorn the event into the prediction or simply ignore it if things didn't fit as expected. Unlike astrology and tarot, however, you don't have a clear set of guidelines to offer the casual dabbler in HDD that he can use to perform his own prognostications.

I also notice in the past year you have contributed very little to HDD itself in this thread, and make appearances only to talk about yourself.
 
Dutch, one of the major issues I have with HDD is the fact it's indistinguishable from astrology and tarot cards. You put up a bunch of mumbo-jumbo, make predictions (and you do make predictions), then after the event you shoehorn the event into the prediction or simply ignore it if things didn't fit as expected. Unlike astrology and tarot, however, you don't have a clear set of guidelines to offer the casual dabbler in HDD that he can use to perform his own prognostications.

I also notice in the past year you have contributed very little to HDD itself in this thread, and make appearances only to talk about yourself.


Well, Blue Mountain, once all the other malarkey is striped away it is simply and entirely just about him after all. Specifically those ‘lessons’ he wants us to learn, like to ‘stay out of space’ and ‘give up nuclear power’. The most bizarre part though, is that he evidently feels that these messages of his own creation should take on more significance or importance when claimed to be from some ‘hyper-dimensional’ hoopla also of his own creation. A sad state of affairs indeed, entirely ensconced within and centered upon Dutch. I certainly would like to see him climb his way out of this singularly dimensional self-centric abyss, but give the substantial investment of himself into it, getting him to separate himself from it, seems unlikely.
 
Except where it doesn't, for the vast majority of time. You're still counting the hits and ignoring the masses of misses. Confirmation Bias to a T.

The determined dates based on Plotonic solid geometry still fits. February 14 ( Hariri ) is still HD Cube, 9/11 and the Madridbombings still match with the HD Tetrahedron. Where it went wrong is when I was monitoring an ongoing 911 based pattern, which should have been 913 based ( if you proceed forward or backwards in time ). In these cases I found out that the expected underlying themes were 3 days late, as I have mentioned several times in the material. And that is correct, becaue I calculated the date 3 days too early. This discrepancy increases over time, so that's why I lost the pattern in several cases.

Also the 1823 'control' timeframe which I use in the triggerdate systems should be in fact 1826 days. Given the +/- days around the triggerdates this was still usefull because of the overlap in calculation
 
So you're claiming that Wolrab's predictions are as non exact as yours?
Strange, Wolrab's predictions are clearly superior to yours.

And as we know, your predictions are .... well....let's say .... spelled differently.

I say HDDesign is not about exact predictions.
 
Well, thanks.

Now about the math errors...

I didn't post the math and the results. You posted them and based your, for want of a better word, predictions on them. The math was plain, simple and flatly wrong. You made a mistake in the equation. I've pointed out the error. You've been running exactly the same equation for at least the past eight years with the same error. Every calculation that you've made over that period was therefore incorrect.

Now address the present issue.

Oh, yes...regards the PM: Tick, tock, tick, tock. I will take over the discussion and explain your not-so-original "method" for you. It's not that hard to do, Dutch. :jaw-dropp

Go for the change of pace - treat the members of this forum honestly and fairly. It would be a refreshing change. You don't end up getting TOS'ed (as occurs regularly for you) and they get some straight poop from you.

Only when I've used ongoing patterns based on Platonic solid geometry, see explanation in previous post
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom