Hyper Dimensional Design

[Dutch]

I do apreciate what you are saying here Sid,

but for me it seems it comes with the message. It's inherent to such a complex 'out of the box' approach of reality, based on intuition and synchronicities in the first place, but intelligently explainable with the rational mind.

Although some might doubt it, I do have a rational mind.

I'm just smart enough to listen to intuition first and to give notice to synchronicities, before I use the ego based ratio.

What I do is not about recognition towards me as a person, nor do I expect others to support what I'm doing.

What does counts, is what seems to be unveiled by dealing with this material.

For me it's just as much a supprise as for those who try to follow it, so it is to be expected that most readers will limited themselves to absorb without response, and that's oke. Some may understand it's not as much a point of discussion, but rather an ( disputable for most ) unveiling point of view of our reality, which seems overwhelming intelligent for those who are able to comprehend.

But it's not easy.....

and despites all efforts here: it has never been debunked and it will never be

 

[Sideroxylon]

I do apreciate what you are saying here Sid,

but for me it seems it comes with the message. It's inherent to such a complex 'out of the box' approach of reality, based on intuition and synchronicities in the first place, but intelligently explainable with the rational mind.

Although some might doubt it, I do have a rational mind.

I'm just smart enough to listen to intuition first and to give notice to synchronicities, before I use the ego based ratio.

What I do is not about recognition towards me as a person, nor do I expect others to support what I'm doing.

What does counts, is what seems to be unveiled by dealing with this material.

For me it's just as much a supprise as for those who try to follow it, so it is to be expected that most readers will limited themselves to absorb without response, and that's oke. Some may understand it's not as much a point of discussion, but rather an ( disputable for most ) unveiling point of view of our reality, which seems overwhelming intelligent for those who are able to comprehend.

But it's not easy.....

and despites all efforts here: it has never been debunked and it will never be

I have an invisible dragon in my garage that no one has ever debunked either.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof

Either your have failed badly in communicating your idea over all these years, it is completely inscrutable to all others and can only be understood and interpreted by its high priest*, or it is a compete load of nonsense.

ETA: *And the high priest of an utterly useless idea, as you have admited your grandiose claim is devoid of any predictive power.

 

[The Man]

I do apreciate what you are saying here Sid,

but for me it seems it comes with the message. It's inherent to such a complex 'out of the box' approach of reality, based on intuition and synchronicities in the first place, but intelligently explainable with the rational mind.

Rational minds have explained it to you many times, you find your synchronicities simply because you want to and you manipulate your one dimensional calculations to archive that egotistical goal.

Although some might doubt it, I do have a rational mind.

I'm just smart enough to listen to intuition first and to give notice to synchronicities, before I use the ego based ratio.

Yet evidently not smart enough to realize that listening to your own " intuition first" is simply a product of your ego.

What I do is not about recognition towards me as a person, nor do I expect others to support what I'm doing.

What does counts, is what seems to be unveiled by dealing with this material.

And once again all that is unveiled is your ego.

For me it's just as much a supprise as for those who try to follow it, so it is to be expected that most readers will limited themselves to absorb without response, and that's oke. Some may understand it's not as much a point of discussion, but rather an ( disputable for most ) unveiling point of view of our reality, which seems overwhelming intelligent for those who are able to comprehend.

But it's not easy.....

and despites all efforts here: it has never been debunked and it will never be

"which seems overwhelming intelligent for those who are able to comprehend."???

You have succumb entirely to your ego and evidently it surprises no one but you.

 

[Daylightstar]

I do apreciate what you are saying here Sid,

but for me it seems it comes with the message. It's inherent to such a complex 'out of the box' approach of reality, based on intuition and synchronicities in the first place, but intelligently explainable with the rational mind.

Although some might doubt it, I do have a rational mind.

I'm just smart enough to listen to intuition first and to give notice to synchronicities, before I use the ego based ratio.

What I do is not about recognition towards me as a person, nor do I expect others to support what I'm doing.

What does counts, is what seems to be unveiled by dealing with this material.

For me it's just as much a supprise as for those who try to follow it, so it is to be expected that most readers will limited themselves to absorb without response, and that's oke. Some may understand it's not as much a point of discussion, but rather an ( disputable for most ) unveiling point of view of our reality, which seems overwhelming intelligent for those who are able to comprehend.

But it's not easy.....

and despites all efforts here: it has never been debunked and it will never be

^{Bolding by Daylightstar}
These are just dishonest words.
Your publicly displayed behavior demonstrates clearly that you do not have a rational mind.
This, is what has been unveiled.

Rational (what you evidently are not) and rationalizing (what you do for yourself ...) are two different things.

None of the items in your wishful thinking have been unveiled. No intelligent explanations have been offered by you, dishonesty and lying, yes. Intelligent explanations, not a shred.

 

[Wolrab]

What's to debunk? I took a random constant and made (shoehorned) predictions immeasurably more accurate than anything HDD has done. Mine were even PREdictions that happened on pre-announced dates. How do you explain that Dutch?

 

[Dutch]

Are you proud now sid?

 

[Dutch]

Sorry man, I've skipped yous post. You know I don't read nor respond to split posts.

Try another time

 

[Dutch]

^{Bolding by Daylightstar}
These are just dishonest words.
Your publicly displayed behavior demonstrates clearly that you do not have a rational mind.
This, is what has been unveiled.

Rational (what you evidently are not) and rationalizing (what you do for yourself ...) are two different things.

None of the items in your wishful thinking have been unveiled. No intelligent explanations have been offered by you, dishonesty and lying, yes. Intelligent explanations, not a shred.

dishonest? never. Do I have an irrational mind? all people who know me think to the opposite.

start using your brains

 

[Dutch]

What's to debunk? I took a random constant and made (shoehorned) predictions immeasurably more accurate than anything HDD has done. Mine were even PREdictions that happened on pre-announced dates. How do you explain that Dutch?

wow! I think you should share if you think it will stands

 

[Paul]

wow! I think you should share if you think it will stands

Perhaps you should read the thread instead of pretending you're important and whining like a baby when no-one agrees.

 

[Paul]

Sorry man, I've skipped yous post. You know I don't read nor respond to split posts.

And you should know that we don't care if you are a juvenile narcissist.

 

[The Man]

Sorry man, I've skipped yous post. You know I don't read nor respond to split posts.

Once again if this is intended for me, my user name is “The Man” and as further admonishments it is Ill advised of you to claim you don’t “respond” to such posts in a response to such a post nor is claiming you won't read a post much of a deterrent as you don’t seem to read them (or respond) very well anyway.

Try another time

Lie another time Dutch.

 

[Daylightstar]

dishonest? never. Do I have an irrational mind? all people who know me think to the opposite.

start using your brains

Dishonest? Yes! All the time. Never? You tell this lie all the time.

As you know, I wasn't referring to what you claim the people that know you (in real life supposedly) think of you.

...
Your publicly displayed behavior demonstrates clearly that you do not have a rational mind. ...

It'll be somewhat challenging to check up on that claim of yours.

What we can check however, is the blatant irrationality you publicly display on this and many other sites, and this evidence clearly shows that you have an irrational mind, and are falsely claiming the opposite.

So much dishonesty coming from you.

 

[Daylightstar]

...
start using your brains

Okay.

... Do I have an irrational mind? all people who know me think to the opposite.
...

I don't think you really believe this yourself.

Your claim reminds me of your colleague's telephone conversation.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7289805&postcount=4140

...
The fact that the synchronicity with my collegue saying "between the moon and Mars", instantly unveiled the periapsis between Phobos and Mars in miles, as the missing link on a paper waiting on my desk for months until the synchronicity would occur that made me understand the connectedness.
...

Ah yes, the story from your 'incredible' 'update' in which you wrote:

"My colleague was on the phone with someone and he was obviously talking about another guy when he said that he thought the guy was a little bit ‘lost’, that it looked as if this guy was not here with his mind, but somewhere between the Moon and Mars."

where you displayed the apparent need to state that this colleague was "obviously talking about another guy".

Again, why would you need to state that this was obvious and why was it obvious, according to you?
You appear to have an issue with that remark of your colleague, even now, as this event appears to be the crux of your latest post.

See also:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6942384&postcount=4099

 

[Sideroxylon]

Are you proud now sid?

Why should I be? Have I made you see sense that this is a load of bollocks?

 

[Wolrab]

Posted by Dutch 21st July 2011, 12:21 PM
#4309

“and still you guys don't dare to try to do the same with random underlying themes for random future dates for an extended period of time ( not based on HDdesign).

So why don't you start with it? you can help eachother if you like”

Posted by me 21st July 2011, 03:40 PM
#4311

“I'll do it.
On Thursday, July 21, 2011 the last Space Shuttle mission ended as the Shuttle Atlantis landed.
By using (hold while I decide what constant I need to use......"i" is too obvious, but probably the most applicable....ah-ha! "p", the plastic constant!) p, the plastic constant, I will demonstrate that something will happen, however vaguely related to the Space Shuttle Atlantis landing for the final time (from a space mission).

The first time line is simple. It is just Day 0 + p = significant event.
HERE IS MY MATH for everyone to follow along:
July 21 + 1.3 = July 22.

My first prediction is that something related to Atlantis returning will happen tomorrow. (as this is the plastic constant, I alone can decide how large the window of opportunity is).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastic_number

Now, going further out requires more advanced math. July 21 is the 202nd day of the year so if that is multiplied by p, we get the next significant dates by adding the result to the date and the result itself is another significant date.

HERE IS MY MATH!!1!11!
202 x 1.324=267.448
On both April 13, 2012 and September 24, 2011.

I will astound you all with my accuracy as soon as I shoehorn events am aware of the events. “

Posted by me 22nd July 2011, 09:36 PM
#4318

“Plastic Dimensional Physics

Just perusing the news and, as I expectedpredicted, there was a slew of events related to the shuttle Atlantis' last mission. Seeing as how it only landed yesterday, I will magnanimously not consider most of those massive hits to my Atlantis Timeline. One thing did stand out, though:
Astronomers Find Largest, Oldest Mass of Water in Universe


http://www.space.com/12400-universe-...oud-water.html

If you can't see the connection, permit me....
Ancient= Plato's Atlantis
Massive amounts of water= c'mon, it was a freakin' SUNKEN continent.
Where? In space.
When= story released today. It took the light from this thing 14 billion years to reach Earth and the story is released today? What are the odds? (1:1).That is just the obvious hits. What say Dutch? “

Posted by me 24th July 2011, 03:59 PM
#4355

“So Dutch, what do you think of my astonishing hit with my new Plastic Dimensional Physics (PDP)? More dead balls accurate than most of the stuff you put up, for sure.

This is an official invite for anyone to use PDP to predict the future after it has passed. The only stipulation is that (unlike some) you must SHOW THE MATH! As plastic implies, there are many ways the math can be twisted and bent to fit. If there are several of us, we won't miss as much and hits won't slip by unnoticed as often.

The constant is =1.32471795724474602596…

Some of the same rules apply as with HDD. There is a window of opportunity of a day and a half on either side. If it didn't happen in the predicted year, wait til the next.
P can be massaged in any way possible so long as it is documented (this means SHOW YOUR MATH!) You can add, subtract, multiply, divide, square, cube, or raise to any power + or- or fractional, use of derivatives, integrals, and i is not only allowed, it is encouraged.

A hit can be confirmed if it can be argued to have something in common with the original event. Any event past, present, or future. has a PDP timeline.

Let's take Dutch up on his challenge! “

Posted by me 23rd September 2011, 09:22 AM
#4535

“I could not have hdDesigned a better hit for my Plastic Dimensional Proofacies! Today (hopefully after midnight GMT) a satellite is expected to fall to Earth. Coming back to Earth for the last time, just like the Space Shuttle Atlantis did when I single handedly discovered Plastic Dimensional Physics. HDD has never given a hit as perfect as this. And I SHOWED THE MATH!”

Posted by me 25th September 2011, 05:48 AM
#4539

I would love to retire with a 100% hit rate, but I still have the April 2012 date. Even if I blow that one, a 50% hit rate is better than HDD has been able to muster.

Posted by me 14th January 2012, 04:51 PM
#4706

Plastic Dimensional Design

Once again Dutch, I am going to show you the superiority of Plastic Dimensional Design over the foolishness you spout.

Sunday January 15 the Grunt Spacecraft is expected to fall back to Earth. This is another obsolete spacecraft returning to Earth for the last time.


Using my specially crafted formula, we see that the starting date is the 202nd day of 2011. Jan.15, 2012 is 178 days later (365-202=163 63+15=178).

The plastic constant (p), as everyone knows, is 1.324. Squaring that we get 1.75296. Because I write the rules we multiply that by 10 and get 175.

The first news report I heard of the Grunt crash day was two days ago (175 days after the start date) from this article dated Jan.11, 2012: http://www.space.com/14215-phobos-gr...ian-ocean.html

Completely accurate and all the MATH is there for all to see.
I could make it more precise if I use the exact length of the year but since the original prediction was : Quote: I will demonstrate that something will happen, however vaguely related to the Space Shuttle Atlantis landing for the final time (from a space mission). I am now 3 for 3. All my stuff is directly related to space craft coming back to Earth. Very specific, none of the wacky convolutions you use.

How do you explain my incredible accuracy?

 

[Dutch]

and your point is, Wolrab?

 

[Daylightstar]

and your point is, Wolrab?

Some say there are no dumb questions. Yours makes me disagree with that.

I ave told you before, try for yourselves without HDDesign and come to the conclusion how little your perspective in fact is

^{Bolding by Daylightstar}... and Wolrab appears to have a better perspective than you.

 

[Dutch]

are you wolrab?

 

[Dutch]

so elaborate and write about his better perspective compared to HDDesign and use your own words