Hyper Dimensional Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
as above - so below
Colliding artificial manmade satellites
and colliding asteroids in space.....during the same timeframe

from the timeline Q1 2009, also with a another splendid 'artificial' Earth-Moon-manmade spacecraft 'transit'( how many 'coincidences' do you need to open up the 'rigid' mind?) :

read on at HDDesign forum
Ridiculous text size reduzed to less delusional proportions by Daylightstar
Colliding asteroids or satellites have no bearing on the delusions of an insignificant dishonest dreamer.
 
Since you need things spelled out again and again:

You make predictions. (But you lie and say you don't make predictions.)

Something else happens. (But you lie to yourself and think you changed events.)

The predictions fail. You lie to us and say you didn't predict anything and that the prediction didn't fail.

It could not be more obvious!!!

You lie, lie, and lie again.

Orphia darling,

You seem to disregard the fact that I don't make exact predictions. HDDesgn doesn't enable an observer to 'see' future as it will materialize. It's about predetermining the underlying themes that will find expression at specific moments in our perception of time. Besides this 'anticipation' on future events, HDDesign does enable the observer ( or observer/participant ) to get a better understanding of reality by applying the elements of HDDesign once they occur. The latter would be less convincable for you so I won't bother you with it. For me personally it's just as valuable ( excuse me for my typo's ).

I'm not a liar, nor am I dishonest. not once
 
You're in denial, Dutch. The facts were in my own words, with supporting evidence. Give your scrutinizers the proper attention they deserve, instead of scrolling past them like you do news articles that don't support your prophecies when you're googling to get your next HDD post fix.

That's not the way it works, Orphia darling.

This material comes to light by synchronicities and intuitive thoughts in the first place, followed by understanding and monitoring in order to try to 'decipher'the deeper meaning.

You can get the proper attention but you have to realise you are not facing an easy task if you truly want to wrap your mind around this.
I don't think, at this stage, you are willing to even consider the possibility that hidden underlying Design even exists. But that's oke. You can ignore the overwhelming flow of coincidences and synchronicities. That's safe.

but it's a waste of opportunity you will once regret
 
Maybe we can try to get a 'real' conversation. Let's stop quoting parts of previous posts and try to bring our contributions to an acceptable level in order to try to get a better view what this is really about. I'm willing
 
dafydd, I do understand your confusion and I'm willing to explain. I really prefer a direct way of conversation, as far as it's possible on a forum, let's just try to seek a normal and open discussion on these issues
 
Maybe we can try to get a 'real' conversation.
We've been doing that for nearly 5 years.


Let's stop quoting parts of previous posts
That's how we tell what we're replying to.


try to bring our contributions to an acceptable level
I'm sorry you feel your contributions are unacceptably poor.


in order to try to get a better view what this is really about. I'm willing
You could start by answering all the question you ignored in the past.
 
I guess this means you don't really want this conversation to achieve an acceptable level.
 
No, you demonstrate in your own words, directly and without quoting parts of previous posts, why you think I am a liar abd dishonest
 
No, you demonstrate in your own words, directly and without quoting parts of previous posts, why you think I am a liar abd dishonest
You do not tell the truth and you then do not tell the truth about the previous lack of truthfulness.
 
I guess this means you don't really want this conversation to achieve an acceptable level.

This is dishonest as well.

Your earlier 'desire' for 'mutual understanding' (see list above) has been demonstrated to be a lie.

Acceptable to this forum, means reality based. Not delusion based.
 
No, you demonstrate in your own words, directly and without quoting parts of previous posts, why you think I am a liar abd dishonest

'Previous posts' are your very own words, the lies that you tell, accompanied with explanations why they are lies.

If you are too stupid to understand plain english....your problem.
 
Day, HDDesign is exactly about what reality comprehends. You are still hiding. In your own words please and explain
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom