Hyper Dimensional Design

[Wolrab]

'research' yes, based on intuitive thoughts and synchronicities in the first place, finding confirmation instantly when the elements of HDDesign are applied. Actual scientific research isn't possible as you can understand.

That is not research, it is subjective and usually called musings. If there was something to HDD, scientific research would confirm it.

 

[The Man]

again: HDDesign is NOT about exact predictions, its about specific underlying themes at specific moments in our perception of time. The future isn't fixed. The whole purpose is to enhance our awareness so we can 'create our reality' more subtle.

Dutch that you would just like to create your own reality is something that you are anything but subtle about.

 

[The Man]

you have to do it with the given explanations, I have a focus on the 'research' that goes on continuously

Wrong on both counts.

 

[The Man]

Amongst your weapons are dishonesty, cowardice and an almost fanatical dedication to the crazy.

No one expects the HDD inquisition!!!!!

 

[Orphia Nay]

Hdd is like a cancer eating Dutch's brain. It's changing his behaviour into someone he wouldn't normally like and it won't let him see what he's now like. He says he doesn't predict, but he says his predictions can change the future. Sad.

 

[Mister Earl]

HDD is garbage. The only place it excels is in its construction. It's built to maximize "hits" (Anything remotely close is a "hit") and completely eliminates "misses" (Oh, it didn't happen on this trigger date, but it will on one of the next ones). It's confirmation bias and wishful thinking run amok. There's nothing scientific about it. I'd hesitate to even call it pseudoscience, simply because pseudoscience at least pretends to be science.

 

[Dutch]

Lebanon braces for indictment, keep your fingers crossed

 

[Dutch]

That is not research, it is subjective and usually called musings. If there was something to HDD, scientific research would confirm it.

A scientific research in relation to synchronicities?

 

[Dutch]

Dutch that you would just like to create your own reality is something that you are anything but subtle about.

We all create our own reality and all together we co-create everything.
Focus on the macrolevel will enable us to co-create more subtle yes.

 

[Dutch]

Hdd is like a cancer eating Dutch's brain. It's changing his behaviour into someone he wouldn't normally like and it won't let him see what he's now like. He says he doesn't predict, but he says his predictions can change the future. Sad.

don't worry about me, you will have your hands full with your own rigid mind.

nothing wrong with my behaviour.

You aren't doing yourselves a favour by trying to discredit me. You call me a liar, now I have cancer in my brain, my behaviour changes etc.

Well, I feel sorry for you

 

[Dutch]

HDD is garbage. The only place it excels is in its construction. It's built to maximize "hits" (Anything remotely close is a "hit") and completely eliminates "misses" (Oh, it didn't happen on this trigger date, but it will on one of the next ones). It's confirmation bias and wishful thinking run amok. There's nothing scientific about it. I'd hesitate to even call it pseudoscience, simply because pseudoscience at least pretends to be science.

Hey earl!

I see you still haven't scrutinized the HDDesign material, based on the logged moments of postings, the synchronicities logged realtime when the occur etc.

You should do so, it will open up even your rigid mind

 

[Paul]

A scientific research in relation to synchronicities?

Exactly, there is nothing scientific about what you do.

Now that you admit that, you could stop the pseudoscientific twisting of genuine terms and you might begin to understand that what you do is about as good as astrology but with less documentation.

 

[Paul]

We all create our own reality and all together we co-create everything.

As usual you are wrong.

reality, n.

I. The quality or state of being real.

1. Real existence; what is real rather than imagined or desired; the aggregate of real things or existences; that which underlies and is the truth of appearances or phenomena.

2.
a. The quality of being real or having an actual existence.
b. Correspondence to fact; truth. Obs.

3. Something that is real; a real fact or state of things; (also) the real nature of something. Freq. in pl.

5.
a. That which constitutes the actual thing, as distinguished from what is merely apparent or external.
b. The real nature or constitution of something; the real thing or state of things.
c. With modifying adjectives, as harsh reality, grim reality, stark reality, etc.: the actual circumstances or facts regarded as oppressive or unpleasant, esp. in contrast to an idealized or imagined state of affairs.

"reality, n.". OED Online. June 2011. Oxford University Press. 28 June 2011 http://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/158934.

Focus on the macrolevel will enable us to co-create more subtle yes.

Do you mean 'if we try and stop bad stuff happening, sometimes it might not happen'?

 

[Sideroxylon]

There is nothing scientific about HDDesign. Dutch likes to put up a facade of doing science, but everything about this is arbitrary. The "calculations" can only be performed and interpreted by the high priest, Dutch.

 

[Paul]

don't worry about me, you will have your hands full with your own rigid mind.

I know this is pointless because you have a rigid mind, but why don't you try carefully considering the points people make and the questions they ask. You might learn something.

nothing wrong with my behaviour.

Compared to David Icke maybe.

You aren't doing yourselves a favour by trying to discredit me.

You don't require discrediting, you had no credibility to begin with.

You call me a liar, now I have cancer in my brain, my behaviour changes etc.

You appear to have something in your brain that stops you from understanding simple sentences.

Well, I feel sorry for you

Ahh, thats sweet.

 

[Dutch]

Exactly, there is nothing scientific about what you do.

Paul, Paul Paul......sigh.

I have been pretty clear about this from the beginning and I have repeated it here regularly.

 

[Dutch]

There is nothing scientific about HDDesign. Dutch likes to put up a facade of doing science, but everything about this is arbitrary. The "calculations" can only be performed and interpreted by the high priest, Dutch.

same thing for you as for Paul

 

[Dutch]

thats sweet

It's not that hard to be polite, this is much better. Good boy!

 

[Sideroxylon]

same thing for you as for Paul

Yes, in discussions you have made it very clear that HDD is completely arbitrary and without any method that could be applied by anyone other than you to reach the same results that you do.

It is completely pointless for anything except perhaps inflating your ego.hat you do.

 

[Sideroxylon]

Double post.