Yes, Dutch, lets go through that List Of Predictions.
I don't do predictions. I try to 'set the stage' so to speak by identifying the hidden underlying timecoded pattern and themes that could get momentum on specific moments in our reality
Dutch, in your post of February 24, 2007 (known as the "List of Predictions")…
… the only reference to any plane crash you made was to flight 522. You made no mention to any 737 crash. You see it as 'important' only because it happened on a day you already decided MUST be important. ANY event would be able to be substituted for that, and you would still claim it as 'important'.
First: the difficult part of detecting an underlying timecoded pattern is to determine the Geometry the pattern come through in our reality. First step is to look at the triggerdates ( I use 6 triggerdates on 3 'windows' ).next step is to try to outline the pattern once the first connection has been made. In case of Srebrenica for instance: the pattern was already outlined based on the triggerdate info, matching with events in our reality. The outlined pattern made it possible to succesfully anticipate on the exit of Milosevic and just recently the arrest of Torimir and The Netherlands sued.
Srebrenica happened back in 1995, the flight 522 crash happened in August 2005 and the underlying has yet to be determined. That's why I have mentioned all 6 triggerdates on the timeline, on which one showed another 737 accident aswell. The others showed different information and probably more important, but time will tell. I will keep on anticipating in relation to the flight 522 crash in order to determine the pattern and the more profound underlying themes.
… you made no reference at all to any satellite. You see it as 'important' only because it happened on a day you already decided MUST be important. ANY event would be able to be substituted for that, and you would still claim it as 'important'.
The chinese hit on this satellite happened with Deep Impact on the triggers: manmade object hitting deliberately another object in space. Here the same thing, the profound underlying themes have yet to come to the surface and the patterns are just emerging and not yet outlined.
Again: I don't do an exact prediction, but this Chinese satellite sure seems related somehow, at least to me
… no mention of any kind was made to a death, Jeltsin’s or otherwise. You see it as 'important' only because it happened on a day you already decided MUST be important. ANY event would be able to be substituted for that, and you would still claim it as 'important'.
Yes i anticipated on an 'exit of a Sun King' on April 22 (+/- 1 day), although the motivation and outlining of the pattern was posted on BAUT forum in detail and not posted here.
… Obama was never mentioned, let alone a security issue related to him. You see it as 'important' only because it happened on a day you already decided MUST be important. ANY event would be able to be substituted for that, and you would still claim it as 'important'.
Same thing here, it was posted on BAUT forum where i was defending the theories during a 30 days ATM period.
The security issue was put on the timeline months ago and Obama was specifically mentioned for the May 3 timeframe. There were several timecoded patterns that came together that made me anticipate this way.
… All references to Hariri were dated before the post was made, and as such, and not PREdictions, but rather POSTdictions. You see it as 'important' only because it happened on a day you already decided MUST be important. ANY event would be able to be substituted for that, and you would still claim it as 'important'.
You can check on my forum and on a dozen others that the Hariri anticipations were posted prior to the anticipated dates ( HD dates at macrolevel). Someone at BAUT used the same argument and to prove it he came with an article about the Hariri tribunal that didn't hit the HD dates at macrolevel. He took the artticle from thousands of coogle hits, apparently at random. It was an article published on September 8, 2006, another keydate I expected an related development and where I have posted about on my forum. I had missed the article back in 2006 and now he comes uo with it in an effort to debunk the material. Instead he did a very big favor by providing the 'missing link', so in fact he gave subconsciously more credit to the material.
"Keep an eye on" What a meaningless prediction. Any event at all that mentioned any of these people, or even anyone remotely related to the events, or perhaps even those simply accused of being related, with no proof of involvement, would have satisfied your 'prediction'. If Mladic had been photographed picking his nose, you would claim victory. If someone were mistakenly identified as Karadzic, you would claim victory. If Seslj destroyed the World Trade Center… Oh wait, it’s been done already.
Seslj is already in jail and indeed I would have considered other events to be a hit, such as the arrest of Mladic or Karadzic, the death of Seslj in jail or his sentence. etc. In fact you are saying that a similar list of event could be made about this underlying theme for any random future date and that's jsut not true. Do it for today or tomorrow and it won't be the same as I did for the june 2 timeframe. I only mentioned it once on the timeline for 2007 and the most important development in relation to this theme indeed happened during that anticipated timeframe. Ofcourse it can be dismissed as coincidental, but I do this over and over again, with completely different underlying patterns and themes, that indeed show events on the anticipated datea that somehow 'have an air' of connectedness or are plain clear related with the underluying theme.
You made mention of several likely names to come up. They were already looking (in January) at extraditing Mladic. "Those politically responsible" is such a wide net that nearly anyone involved in world politics in 1995 could be considered to fit that mold.
They are looking for Mladic for more than 10 years. I expect he will finally be caught on an anticipated date outlined by the identified pattern. It will show up on the next timeline for the second hals of 2007 and beyond.
Safe haven Srebrenica was protected by Dutch troops if i may recall.
I don't think it was a stand-alone decission by the Dutch government and I have said repeatedly that the patterns, which are still running, will eventually identify those responsible at the highest levels.
You will now claim that I’m being unfair, that I’m being too specific. That’s exactly why I wanted you to give us a definition, before gathering data, of what would be important. Had you given such a definition, there would be no room to be unfair.
You aren't unair, not at all. I need to be pushed to make more clear what it all means.
