• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Hustler woo

PerryLogan said:
No, but I once Googled Halle Berry in her Catwoman suit. I'm only human.

As to Hustler, the conspiracy guys are obviously starved for attention. They will ride on anyone's coattails--Charlie Sheen, Larry Flynt, and other classy types.
Click to expand...

I agree. While they and their Ilk will try to pass this off as "Exposure for the Truth" it is clearly ATTENTIONWHORING/ATTENTIONSLUTTING.

just my opinion.

TAM:)
 
I bet many people have "pulled it" while looking at Hustler.
 
Pardalis said:
Maybe they think they'll gain more followers by having an article on Hustler, knowing full well that men's critical thinking skills drop to - 100 when reading that magazine.
Click to expand...
I dunno, I'm pretty critical when I'm reading Hustler. For example, I apply Euclidian Geometry concepts when evaluating various shapes such as curves, arcs, spheroids and the like (I DO like). Basically I'm trying to determine whether the shapes in the magazine are theoretically possible.

Some months, I have determined they are not. Figments, air brushings, visions (VISIONS) that defy the laws of Euclidian Geometrical Dynamicism.
 
It could be that the twooffers like Hustler because it sharpens their image analyzing skills of holes and plane shaped objects.


I'm just asking questions.
 
I wonder if a man's - er - tower has ever collapsed in 6.6 seconds soon after "reading" Hustler?
 
Maybe Hustler "readers" can't see the difference between fake and reality, or maybe they just don't care?
 
Pardalis said:
Maybe Hustler "readers" can't see the difference between fake and reality, or maybe they just don't care?
Click to expand...
For example, as I'd indicated in my Euclidian Geometric approach - the determination between fake and reality in the area of Spheroids?
 
Maybe Hustler is a good venue for CTists after all... I mean, they don't know a thing about structural engeneering or science, or math, or even criminal investigation. Where else can they go? They are experts at JAQing off.
 
Maybe Hustler "readers" can't see the difference between fake and reality, or maybe they just don't care?
Click to expand...

I would imagine that eyesight problems are an issue.....
 
Pardalis said:
Maybe Hustler is a good venue for CTists after all... I mean, they don't know a thing about structural engeneering or science, or math, or even criminal investigation. Where else can they go? They are experts at JAQing off.
Click to expand...


Like the condom-effectiveness study that was done at the University of Southern California? (mascot: .... wait for it.... Trojans)
 
Evidence of a relationship between pornography and paranoid fantasists?

The trilogy was originally written between 1969 and 1971 while Wilson and Shea were both associate editors for Playboy magazine. As part of the role, they dealt with correspondence from the general public on the subject of civil liberties, much of which involved paranoid rants about imagined conspiracies. The pair began to write a novel with the premise that "all these nuts are right, and every single conspiracy they complain about really exists".[4]
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Illuminatus!_Trilogy#Publishing_history
 
No. I will not, not, NOT make a joke about clue goo.

:D
 
Well given Perry Logan's ideas about angry white guys with IQs in the low 80s, I'd say they are exposing themselves to their target demographic.
 
~enigma~ said:
Why are these idiots proud of being in Hustler?
Click to expand...

I still recall 1983 when Hustler broke the true story on flight 007 being shot down. It seems that the CIA played subliminal voice commands in the cockpit forcing the pilots to fly off course.

I also remember when they blew the lid off of the AIDS cover up; seems it is actually caused by KY jelly, not a virus (I am not making these up). There is nothing so crazy that Larry Flint won't publish it.

You know what is great about Hustler though? The women in it look obtainable. When I look at Playboy I see the type of women that I would never have a chance with in real life. When I look at Hustler I see the type of woman I can relate to. Just saying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom