You're absolutely unreal. I asked a couple questions! See, you smug folks are not in the least bit interested in educating or discussing. It's all paranoia and insult. Just like the other side! (Actually, you are worse).
SERIOUSLY, drop the paranoia. I'm not some agent in your war with 911blogger (as I just posted). If that's what this is all about, I'll accept your apologies, if anybody cares to make one. Or are you always this way?
I haven't even read Reynolds and Woods theory. But I will soon. Have any of you really read it?
If you think that the posters here are dismissive, and smug that they know the answers you're going to "just ask" before you "just ask" them, you're right.
There's a reason for that.
It can be summed up pretty well by modifying a scene from "Young Frankenstein":
First Elder: Oh tosh. This man is different, I tell you. You can see that after he talks with you for five minutes. Yes.
Villager: He's a Troofer, and they're all the same. It's in their blood, they can't help it. All those dimbulbs, they're all alike. They say they want the truth, but what they really want to do is stroke their egos.
Second Elder: That's enough now. I will not have this meeting become a free-for-all. These are very serious charges you're making. All the more painful to us, your elders, because we still have nightmares from five times before.
You are not the first person, or the second person, or even the fifth to come to this forum "just asking questions". It's a well-trod path. Surely you must know that, since you were "warned". Most of us (I certainly can't speak for everyone, but I will anyway) don't find insinuations phrased as questions interesting, because we've seen them before, we did the research, and we think they're bogus. They're bogus as insinuations, they're bogus as questions. We've looked at the questions, compared answers, and voted for reality. We did the math. We've looked up the actual values instead of arguing from incredulity, or taking the word of what "some dude told me".
So when you come in here, following the same script, people will poke fun at you. Trying to slide in, "just asking questions", trying to accuse without accusing, simply won't work. We're immune. We've got antibodies against "faster than free fall", and "no plane into the pentagon", "controlled demolition of WTC1, 2 and 7", "pull it", "insurance scam", "the towers weren't making money", "Flight 93 was shot down", "the fat-faced Osama", "they didn't know how to fly", "Norad stood down", "a Bush was in charge of security", "so and so heard explosions","suspicious airline stock trading", all that stuff. Really. As a group, we've looked at it, and the closer you look at it, the less there is there.
You're not going to intrigue anyone. No one's going to say, "Gee, I hadn't thought of that", because either we've thought of it, or it's been suggested, and we looked at it, and there's no evidence to support it.
Oh, and welcome to the well-trod path -- er, the forum.
