Human Population control
- Thread starter AWPrime
- Start date
-
- Tags
- control population
In a pure sense, starvation is the natural method of population control. When a population becomes larger than its environment can sustain, there isn't enough food and some of them die.
Whether or not the human species has exceeded the carrying capacity of Earth is a different matter entirely.
Whether or not the human species has exceeded the carrying capacity of Earth is a different matter entirely.
IllegalArgument
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
- Messages
- 1,895
None of the above, economic dis-incentives, I think, would be the best way to discourgage people from having too many children.
The question is moot because it is under control already.
The two best ways to limit population growth are educating girls and getting wealthier. Because these two things are happening world wide, the UN is now predicting that Earth's population with top out around 9 billion around 2050. (I am going by memory on these figures and dates but the important thing is that world population will start declining in the second half of this century).
CBL
The two best ways to limit population growth are educating girls and getting wealthier. Because these two things are happening world wide, the UN is now predicting that Earth's population with top out around 9 billion around 2050. (I am going by memory on these figures and dates but the important thing is that world population will start declining in the second half of this century).
CBL
Libertarian
Thinker
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2001
- Messages
- 248
Overpopulation is a MYTH. That so many people on a skeptics' forum still believe in it makes me wanna scream.......
I looked for the UN figures and they have redone their forecast to be slightly higher.
They are currently predicting a maximum population of 9.22 billion in 2075. In 2002, they were predicting a maximum population of 8.92 billion in 2050.
http://iis-db.stanford.edu/evnts/3961/Joe_Chamie_Population_to_2300.pdf
In any case, the population of the world is stabilizing at a high but obviously manageable level.
CBL
They are currently predicting a maximum population of 9.22 billion in 2075. In 2002, they were predicting a maximum population of 8.92 billion in 2050.
http://iis-db.stanford.edu/evnts/3961/Joe_Chamie_Population_to_2300.pdf
In any case, the population of the world is stabilizing at a high but obviously manageable level.
CBL
Libertarian
Thinker
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2001
- Messages
- 248
chulbert said:
Thanks for asking me to clarify. I meant that overpoplulation does not exist. There are arguments that it may never exist, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to discuss them.
However, let me be specific. While "overpopulation" can be defined more than one way, I believe the somewhat intuitive definition is best: when the sheer number of people is the cause behind problems (food, crime, environmental destruction) then we have overpopulation
I agree with those that say that education and wealth will be more than sufficient (and are the only moral way) to "control" the human population. But I answered "natural predators" because just one of those guys took out almost a whole team of commandos including the governor of Minnesota and Apollo Creed. So they're badass.
Overpopulation can happen but hasn't happen on global scale. It has been seen on local scale. But isn't that important to this discussion.Libertarian said:
My view of overpopulation: When the local support mechanisme falls by being overstressed by too many people, which is followed by a dramatic reduction in numbers.
As we can see around us, the number of people is limited by one cause or the other. If this wasn't the case then our species would multiply into infinity.
The important thing to this discussion is that we humans have the option of selecting what will limit our numbers.
I'm glad we had this discussion. Allow me to dispense a small amount of advice and point out that few things are as intuitive as one might think, especially the definition of terms in a debate. Overpopulation has a very specific definition in terms of ecology that's different than the definition you use.Libertarian said:
SezMe
post-pre-born
I see those problems every day in the news. If you do to, then please explain why overpopulation is a myth.Libertarian said:
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
Orwell said:
That's boring. What would be much more interesting is putting a wonder drug into the water supply that turns most of the population gay, gay, gay. The remainder can produce the next generation, which will benefit from smaller class sizes in school and having a 100:1 hairstylist-to-civilian ratio. Those kids will have great hair.