Yes that is all well and good.Well, I for 1 believe deeply in the "evolution" theory... [gibberish deleted]
Or it could just be a guy resting things on his sticky sweaty skin.
Yes that is all well and good.Well, I for 1 believe deeply in the "evolution" theory... [gibberish deleted]
Only if that culture has experience with gaps in the cave wall.2) I've found, from experience, that eyes are very good at distinguishing 'gap' from 'solid rock'.
Just like the indigeneous tribes could not see the ships of Columbus because they had no experience with them
We should write a book. We'll hire Trudea to produce the television spots and Kent Hovind the radio spots.Exactly the same situation as how the Apollo astronauts couldn't see the four-dimensional indigenes on Luna. So, since none of us knows how to generate a magnetic field on our skin to attract cutlery, we shouldn't be able to perceive these wonders, right?
If the cave was "smoke filled" then they had a fire going, which means it wasn't completely dark...The problem is that no-one to-day knows how to measure how long it took in those smoke filled caves to make a real difference ...
Only if that culture has experience with gaps in the cave wall.
Er, well gosh, I'd not considered people living there entire lives inside caves with no entrances to be a significant population.
This is in response to your rant in the segment of this that was removed and which I just read. In a response to mine re: sadness for those who know nothing of science, you responded with the old Bumblebees can't fly - but they do anyway - canard. The idiot who "proved that " was using flight characteristics for fixed wing aircraft. The Bumblebee is not fixed wing. Multiple persons (those having real scientific backgrounds) jumped that and trounced it almost immediately BECAUSE THEY KNEW SCIENCE AND BEHAVED LIKE SCIENTISTS IN THE FACE OF BAD SCIENCE DO. Which is what many of us are doing in the face of your feelings about magnetic people (frauds), monopoles (demonstrably unseen anywhere - that is where I had you on the North or South Poles thing and why I asked if you were joking) etc.I know their are people who can make your magnetic tapes and cards null and void. They "apparently" have a lot of magnetism, whether this is "north" or "south" would be unknown without sophisticated devices. By the way, magnetic influences on birds have been proven, and early people could navigate without light just like bats, probably these are powers the ancients had, long forgotten by us (as well as losing our legs from not using them to run and walk any more.)
Like the accountant said to the janitor, its nothing to worry about!!! (no pun intended)!
Just like the indigeneous tribes could not see the ships of Columbus because they had no experience with them,
NITPICK ALERT!!!IIRC, some animals have organs that can detect the orientation of magnetic fields. No such organs are present in humans.
It's a joke (I hope). The idiot movie (I forget the title but it was something like "What the &^$@#*did Idiot Investors give us money for, anyway") that had Marlee Matlin demonstrate she has a problem way bigger than deafness as she appears to believe that quantum theory (which functionally applies only to the elementary particles) means that primitive peoples cannot see anything if they have no prior knowledge of it's existence (thus Amerinds could see waves from the approaching ships of Columbus but not the ships themselves). This is, of course, a crock.They couldn't?
If this is so hard to accept, why would "magnetism" have such an "attraction" for everyone? And why would everyone say that "attractive" people have "magnetic" personalities???? Why, indeed???
No-body knows how the first cavemen (and cave-women) ever found the iron that led to the iron age, which led to modern society. So, I honestly believe that primitive cave-men (and cave-women) "evolved" their magnetic "sight" to find the small iron samples in the ground, so they could start the "iron age" by digging the iron out. Then they could make sharp knives that were no match for the stone tools of the other caves. So, the cave-men and cave-women who had magnetic sight outfought the others, and evolution occurred to get them in to-day's population and an organ in the brain, as the nitwit alert said.
Beware what you wish for - you may get it!!!You're referring to "animal magnetism", insidespace, which is totally different from elemental magnetism. ANIMAL magnetism was a term coined to describe the so-called "ethereal fluid" that humans could use to influence things. It was SPECIFICALLY developed to contrast with regular "magnetism", like you find with magnets. Animal magnetism DOES NOT refer to any human ability to magnetically attract metals.
Here's a question: if ancient man had to use some "magnetic sense" to find Iron, then how did they discover bronze, which isn't magnetic, and was very prevalently used for tools before iron was?
Futhermore, anyone who's read the Wikipedia article on the Iron age, or (can we hope) an actual reference book knows that "cave men" did not use iron. Humans were living in normal, non-cave structures by that point.
I'll be surprised if you respond directly to the points I've made. Please surprise me.

"nitwit alert"?Well I was happy to see that nitwit alert, because ...
