Thank you for replying, though I did ask you to explain your ideas in a concise (short) fashion rather than a massive wall of text which jumps from subject to subject apparently at random.
I'm sure that what you are trying to explain seems both obvious and simple to you, and I'm sure it's frustrating for you to have to keep explaining to us what is clear to you. But unfortunately some words that you use make no sense in the context of your sentences; you appear to be ascribing different meanings to the words than their standard dictionary (widely understood) definitions, so it's very difficult to follow your thoughts.
Human beings and their remains inside of coal demonstrate that previous humans lived in times stated to not involve human life or evolution as a process as a scientific review. This would support biblical evidence rather than Scientific theory.
Apart from woo sites, I can find no evidence that human remains have ever been found in coal formations. I can find some evidence that human remains have been found in coal
after it has been dug out of the ground. I can find no evidence that any of these remains have been dated to a time when humans were not thought to have existed.
-de-evolution was a theory proposed by archaeological evidence that human beings in our ancient past caused the Earth to be irradiated by the Sun, turning her into a coal body.
De-evolution would be no change over time. Can you produce some of this archaeological evidence for "de-evolution"?
Can you explain how these ancient humans 'caused' the earth to be 'irradiated' by the sun? Sunlight, which existed long before there were humans on the earth, is mainly formed of three types of non-ionising radiation (infrared light, visible light and ultraviolet light). The word 'irradiated' is usually used to refer to the effects part of the EMR spectrum which is ionising radiation.
Coal is formed by pressure on dead organic material, not by sunlight.
-radiation from this attack therefore altered the atmospheric condition and when Nature returned by replaced oxygen in the atmosphere it was mutated and eventually via natural selection the mutations were removed from genetic conception
I'm sorry, but this sentence as written makes no sense. What attack? Where did 'Nature' go that it then returned? Your mention of natural selection implies you do accept evolution, but your discussion above about Biblical theories and de-evolution seem to imply that you do not accept evolution as fact.
-this would provide a reason for an atmospheric condition into a evolution of replacing the cellular information back into a higher intelligence, where the same sort of scientific information could be accessed through the same brain condition
Again, you seem to be using words with non-standard definitions, so your sentence is impossible to understand.
-to propose ancient wisdom would quantify to question how a human being first thought about astronomy or science as an exploration and self expression function
-this would be an informed review, which would have involved witnessing falling star bodies burning out at night time. The increase of these burning bodies would have been a warning that also involved identifiable cellular reactions.
I think you may be talking about meteors. They are a natural and well-understood phenomenon, and despite the laymen's term 'falling stars' they are not stars, nor do they originate from stars. What identifiable cellular reactions do you mean?
-therefore past situations involved building structures that today's secret orders maintain was masonry, sacred or holy buildings
'Therefore' is usually used to introduce a conclusion which follows from the premises previously explained. But nothing you said above has anything to do with building structures, or any alleged secret orders.
-reviewing these orders demonstrates that they pursued alchemists and astronomers, murdered and jailed them. The question would be, why?
What orders? And who are 'they'?
-reading the religious documents as a quantifiable evidence of pre historical disasters reveals that human beings were involved in STONE LEVITATION practices and that altering atomic bonds at a radiation level caused falling stars or meteors to hit the Earth.
Can you show chapter and verse of these 'stone levitation practices' and explain who or what is altering atomic bonds? What is the 'radiation' level, and how does altering atomic bonds cause meteors to hit the earth?
Rather than address your entire post at this time, I've just addressed the first few points as it appears that these are the basics on which the remainder of your post depends. If my time permits, and hopefully following your reply to the above request for more explanation, I will address the rest of your post.
By the way, asking if you are or ever have taken or been prescribed psycho-active drugs is not an insult. Mental illness is not something of which to be ashamed. Many people come here with very long and somewhat disorganised posts, or with posts exhibiting some degree of paranoia, and it is almost always the case that these people are suffering from a mental illness which distorts their thinking, causes them to see connections in otherwise unconnected things, and prevents them from seeing the world in the same way as the majority of the population. Sometimes this can lead to unhappiness, difficulty relating to others and feelings of isolation or of danger. The reason people here ask the question is to encourage those who are suffering to seek some help with their illness, and to ensure that the reasons for their distorted view of the world is taken into account when replying. Very few people here are psychiatrists and nobody can provide a diagnosis over the internet.