Then you have the people from the area of turkey were the 'arayan' culture most likely came from and they were reffered to as turk-a-******* by the brits or towel heads of some sort. It makes no sense.
Just a quick correction in my first paragraph. I know what you mean, but I want to clarify in more detail. Arayan is a small culture of Indian fishermen. Aryan is a mythical race that supposedly first spoke the Indo-European language. I say mythical, because it is a race based on language group. It is very hard to tell what language group early speakers of a language spoke, because they didn't have writing. Any such race would have to be based completely on speculation.
The belief was that these people were the original Caucasian people, or people from the region surrounding the caucasus mountains. This is a large area that includes Western Russia, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and the North-East edge of Turkey. The idea that white people descended from these original caucasians has been disproven in modern migration patterns.
For instance, there are markers in your Y-DNA that tell you who your ancestors were in different locations over thousands of years. These are mutations that are found in skeletons (normally the enamel protected teeth) known to live at different time periods. Only descendants of that skeleton have the same mutations most of the time.
My Y-DNA has been demonstrated to have migrated from Africa to Southern Spain. From Southern Spain to Catalan. From Catalan to Ireland, and from Ireland to Scotland. I am very white with reddish-brown hair, and brown eyes.
The Nazis would of thought that my white appearance and dark hair and eyes was a sign of imbreeding between the descendants of the original Caucasians and inferior races. The reality is that my ancestors developed lighter skin as they moved north based on the sun. The skeletons in Spain were still black. We can tell by their DNA. The skeletons in Ireland became white. We will never know for sure whether it was from cross-breeding or mutation, yet the truth is that the sun decided the skin color had to change. White people consistantly become black as they moved south, and black people consistantly become white as they move north. It is so consistant, that one skin color can be considered superior before the invention of Vitamin D pills and sun block. A white person is superior far from the equator with the ability to produce more Vitamin D than a dark skinned person. A dark skinned person is superior near the equator with the ability to survive harsher sun exposure with less chance of skin cancer.
The concept of race is partly based on the misunderstanding of breeding. Forced breeding always limits the gene pool to smaller more fragile groups. Natural mutation always strengthens the species by giving the species more tickets to win the natural selection lottery. Humans are still not smart enough to know all the selective pressures on an animal, and horrible fragile pure dog breeds on the edge of extinction are perfect examples.
In reality the skin colors have all developed from mutation at some point that had nothing to do with breeding. They literally popped into existance out of nowhere. Dark skin is the original skin color of everyone's ancestry. The mutation was natural and occured based on a specific probability of change. If someone decided to kill off all blacks and import Whites to the equator, they could be bringing in the ancestors of the future blacks at the equator. Breeding does not prevent natural genetic drift, and nature will naturally reselect the people that can actually survive in that environment.
Again, I wish I could post links. You will just have to use keywords from what I said and google it to confiirm my statements. I think I have about 5 posts before I can post links.
