Hey Im not saying he's perfect, I just wasn't sure what was so objectionable about the part Cicero drug out. If our mission here is to find a time when he was wrong, or misspoke, would we really be surprised to find examples of each?
Not many can claim spotless records in these respects... I guess Cicero's argument is that Zinn's is SO shoddy, we should discount most of what he says. Given my experience with his material, I'm not sure that's true. I still think Cicero is missing "the weight and meaning" of a viewpoint he doesn't "favor".
Listen to the whole interview. When Zinn is asked to defend his point of view of America, and how he arrived at his POV, Zinn seems to answer these questions as if he is doing so for the first time in his life. Zinn never waivers from his POV in his books, but when confronted with basic questions about the validity of his POV, the supposedly cogent author becomes wishy–washy. Wasn't there any dissent in his classrooms as expressed by his students? Did all his students just blindly accept Zinn's take on American history?