How to interpret this evidence?

You know? You're a lost cause, Rikeln.

I give up. You're right. It means what you said it meant. You win the thread!

Hooray!

This particular vendor at the Troll Snack Bar is closing down.
 
Foolmewunz said:
You know? You're a lost cause, Rikeln.

I give up. You're right. It means what you said it meant. You win the thread!

Hooray!

This particular vendor at the Troll Snack Bar is closing down.
Click to expand...


It doesn't mean what I said it meant. My interpretation was that he was saying that Bilderberg is into world-government. He wasn't saying that. He was saying that Bilderberg is into something that the Nationalists/Conspiracists call world-government but that the Bilderbergers call a One-World Community/New World Order.
 
Rikeln said:
It doesn't mean what I said it meant. My interpretation was that he was saying that Bilderberg is into world-government. He wasn't saying that. He was saying that Bilderberg is into something that the Nationalists/Conspiracists call world-government but that the Bilderbergers call a One-World Community/New World Order.
Click to expand...

So?
 
so what? got a thesis?

Smith's rules for debate said:
For Proponents
Choose a definitive formulation of the thesis you are proposing, and communicate this formulation to your opponents at least several days beforehand. (Proponents and opponents should be clear about the thesis that is being debated.)

State this formulation of the thesis at the beginning and end of your presentation, and several times in the middle. (The audience should be clear about the thesis that is being debated.)

Make it clear what the theoretical background of your argument is. (E.g., in ethics: utilitarianism, Kantian ethics, etc.)

Attempt to trap your opponent, by anticipating his arguments beforehand and showing what is wrong with them.

Do not be afraid to use visual aids to make your point.
Click to expand...

Is this your thesis? Could you please better define the terms in your thesis?

Bilderberg desires something they refer to as a One-World Community/New World Order
Click to expand...
 
Ah, your thesis is a pair of question marks. Excellent. In that case, I refute it with this response: "^%." Flawless, I'm sure you'll agree.
 
Sledge said:
Ah, your thesis is a pair of question marks. Excellent. In that case, I refute it with this response: "^%." Flawless, I'm sure you'll agree.
Click to expand...

Well I think !!!???&^^#@ is much more convincing!!
 
Sledge said:
Ah, your thesis is a pair of question marks. Excellent. In that case, I refute it with this response: "^%." Flawless, I'm sure you'll agree.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure I presented an argument in the OP. It was more of a "how do you interpret this evidence" thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom