Did it suddenly become more interesting in the very few days since you posted it the first time and it was extensively discussed? You didn’t participate in that discussion. Why post it again?
That table was created by a fellow named Kevin O'Byrne who styled himself as Kevin of the Teachers. You can learn more about the fellow here.
Reposting the same thing every few days because it's interesting is not high-IQ behavior.
A very counterintuitive finding, in my experience.
—are commonly exhibited by so many folks wallowing down in the "median sd" territory. You don't need a brain the size of a planet to appreciate Beethoven's 6th symphony.
Indeed, we need to find out where on the table "behaves the same as a short shell script" lies.
Why do you think its worth revisiting? The table looks utterly absurd.
Looks like the same nonsense as it was before.
Yes, there was a discussion of this table on page 25 of this thread. You did not participate except to claim you had a method you could use to raise you I.Q. to a much higher number. Since you did not engage in the actual discussion, there is nothing to "revisit."
You steadfastly refuse to describe what procedure we're supposed to "practice" in order to reach these lofty I.Q. levels.
I have the feeling that smoking had something to do with the origins of these “theories”.Just checking in to see how things are going!
Carry on. Smoke if you've got 'em.
''
This is pure insanity. I don't even understand what some of it is meant to mean. What the hell is "New creation"? Why does it seem to think everyone who isn't very gifted is "a slavery to conditioning" whatever that gibberish is meant to mean?
