How the WTC Core Supports Weakened.

[Wowbagger]

SBrown, if you think all of our suggestions are wrong. I'd love to know what your theory is. How do YOU think the core supports weakened, and more importantly, what evidence do you have to back that theory up?
Or, alternatively, if you do not have an answer of your own, why are you so quick to dismiss our answers?

You think we are a cult simply because we provided some factual answers to your question? How is your behavior is any different from cult-like mentality?

 

[Ducky]

Wowbagger, good point. How is SBrown's posting any different than, say, Kurious_Kathy?

She feels the need to come tell us we're all wrong to show her cult she fights the good fight.

 

[kookbreaker]

Sure as long as it is on my podcast.

Have we determined prior to this that this is a Roxdog sock? i was away for the weekend.

 

[SBrown]

Have we determined prior to this that this is a Roxdog sock? i was away for the weekend.

Do you guys always speak in code here?

 

[Gravy]

Sure as long as it is on my podcast.

Another Looser declines the challenge of a rational one-on-one debate. That's the second one today, by the way (I dealt with another one by email). Aren't there ANY Loosers who aren't cowards?

 

[kevin]

I think it should be pointed out...

The 47 core columns were not single lengths that ran the entire way from the foundations to the top of the buildings. There were a series of columns (can someone confirm their length?) bolted together in sections. Hence why they broke apart the way they did - the forces of the collapse undermined the bolts holding each section.

they were this long:

Notice too that although they may be 4' on a side (I haven't actually confirmed that dimension) they were hollow.

 

[Gravy]

Do you guys always speak in code here?

Please provide a link to your podcast.

 

[RandFan]

No because pasta is not 4foot thick steel.

The principle is the same. Do you understand physics? A paper plane isn't a 747 but it can exhibit the same principles of aerodynamics.

Are you just being obtuse? Do you not understand the concept of principles and how a principle of physics can be scaled and applied to an object of different properties?

The spaghetti example was given you to teach you a principle. Much like what is done in science class. You did take science class didn't you?

 

[Levantine]

Another Looser declines the challenge of a rational one-on-one debate. That's the second one today, by the way (I dealt with another one by email). Aren't there ANY Loosers who aren't cowards?

If they weren't cowards, they probably wouldn't be Loosers. They'd be man (or woman) enough to review the evidence and admit fault with their position. Or at least show a willingness to do so.

 

[RandFan]

Sure as long as it is on my podcast.

Why, what difference could it possibly make?

 

[Gravy]

If they weren't cowards, they probably wouldn't be Loosers. They'd be man (or woman) enough to review the evidence and admit fault with their position. Or at least show a willingness to do so.

Good point. I never quite looked at it that way.

 

[kevin]

Why, what difference could it possibly make?

It's about retaining the power of the all mighty editor. cut out the parts that make you look bad, and trim up the "unnecessary" comments from the other person to clarify (i.e. reverse) there meaning.

oh wait, you were asking sbrown. my bad.

 

[RandFan]

It's about retaining the power of the all mighty editor. cut out the parts that make you look bad, and trim up the "unnecessary" comments from the other person to clarify (i.e. reverse) there meaning.

oh wait, you were asking sbrown. my bad.

I know, SBrown will have difficulty answering.

 

[SBrown]

Do you guys serve Randi or Gravey? Cause right now you look like a bunch of Gravey lackeys.

 

[Gravy]

Do you guys serve Randi or Gravey? Cause right now you look like a bunch of Gravey lackeys.

Know what you look like? A sad, ignorant coward.
Who can't even spell "Gravy" correctly.

 

[SBrown]

Know what you look like? A sad, ignorant coward.
Who can't even spell "Gravy" correctly.

Nope wrong like usual.

 

[Gravy]

Nope wrong like usual.

That's right, I forgot to add "troll." Now, since you have noting to add to this discussion forum, please troll elsewhere. Your behavior is childish, unpleasant, and unnecessary. You'll always be welcomed back here if you learn to behave like an adult.

 

[SBrown]

That's right, I forgot to add "troll." Now, since you have noting to add to this discussion forum, please troll elsewhere. Your behavior is childish, unpleasant, and unnecessary. You'll always be welcomed back here if you learn to behave like an adult.

Childish?

You called me an ignorant coward.......

All I have seen from you is childish, yet you represent the cult, I do not.

 

[Gravy]

Ignore feature, meet SBrown. His first experience with beer has made him cranky.

 

[Pardalis]

Or crankey.