slingblade
Unregistered
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2005
- Messages
- 23,466
I don't think, Freddy, that the issue should be "is the person racist?"
Racism is more about a dominant group, in this case whites, having undue power and influence (THE In-Group) over minority groups (The Out-Groups).
When your group, whatever its composition, is the minority out-group, you very clearly feel the lack of power your group has. I mean, obviously, if you had the power, your group wouldn't be the out-group! It is natural in that case to want to wrest power, of whatever sort, wherever you can take it. If you discover it is permissible for your out-group to mock the powerful and influential In-Group, then isn't it wholly understandable when you do so?
Fat comedians make fun of thin people, but doing so doesn't suddenly make being thin socially unacceptable. In fact, the mockery doesn't really harm the higher social status of thin people in any way.
It doesn't even have to be a case of majority in-group vs. minority out-group. Depending on the nature of the power wielded, a minority can be the dominant In-Group, and discriminate against a majority out-group.
Going back to weight, let's say, for instance, that fat, unhealthy people far outnumber thin, fit people. That they are the majority doesn't appear to give them status or power, does it? In fact, if most of the people in the HR department are thin and fit, you might find that tends to be the kind of person who gets hired, or promoted, at that company, right?
So it's not about whether a person is racist, but rather, whether the person belongs to a group that has power over or dominates other groups.
Even when white TV shows make fun of white out-groups (ignorant rednecks), the out-groups still remain part of the dominant in-group, and still share the power of that in-group over the other out-groups.
In other words, the redneck, no matter how much you make fun of him, will always be white.
The black person, no matter what, will never be white, will never be part of the white in-group.
We know this, because we still use the words to make the color distinction.
So if a person makes a remark that they don't mean to be racist, but it's the sort of remark that just reinforces negative racial stereotypes, and shows clearly there's a power-imbalance, yah, it's pretty much a racist remark. But no, that doesn't mean the person is necessarily racist. If the remark causes harm, though, does it really matter if your intent was consciously racist or not? It has a racial power-imbalance effect, and I'd say that's what actually matters.
Racism is more about a dominant group, in this case whites, having undue power and influence (THE In-Group) over minority groups (The Out-Groups).
When your group, whatever its composition, is the minority out-group, you very clearly feel the lack of power your group has. I mean, obviously, if you had the power, your group wouldn't be the out-group! It is natural in that case to want to wrest power, of whatever sort, wherever you can take it. If you discover it is permissible for your out-group to mock the powerful and influential In-Group, then isn't it wholly understandable when you do so?
Fat comedians make fun of thin people, but doing so doesn't suddenly make being thin socially unacceptable. In fact, the mockery doesn't really harm the higher social status of thin people in any way.
It doesn't even have to be a case of majority in-group vs. minority out-group. Depending on the nature of the power wielded, a minority can be the dominant In-Group, and discriminate against a majority out-group.
Going back to weight, let's say, for instance, that fat, unhealthy people far outnumber thin, fit people. That they are the majority doesn't appear to give them status or power, does it? In fact, if most of the people in the HR department are thin and fit, you might find that tends to be the kind of person who gets hired, or promoted, at that company, right?
So it's not about whether a person is racist, but rather, whether the person belongs to a group that has power over or dominates other groups.
Even when white TV shows make fun of white out-groups (ignorant rednecks), the out-groups still remain part of the dominant in-group, and still share the power of that in-group over the other out-groups.
In other words, the redneck, no matter how much you make fun of him, will always be white.
The black person, no matter what, will never be white, will never be part of the white in-group.
We know this, because we still use the words to make the color distinction.
So if a person makes a remark that they don't mean to be racist, but it's the sort of remark that just reinforces negative racial stereotypes, and shows clearly there's a power-imbalance, yah, it's pretty much a racist remark. But no, that doesn't mean the person is necessarily racist. If the remark causes harm, though, does it really matter if your intent was consciously racist or not? It has a racial power-imbalance effect, and I'd say that's what actually matters.