Nonpareil
The Terrible Trivium
I'm not saying that viruses and bacteria do not exist I'm just saying none of us have any proof which means that we all are taking it on faith.
<snip>
The same goes with anything reported by medicine. Unless you started the research your yourself and finished it from start to finish you are going strictly on faith.
So are you saying that every single time someone has reported that a virus or pathogen is attacking the immune system, they have been lying? That all evidence supporting that is faked?
Now that is all fine for you guys because you are unaware of cures for diseases said to be incurable. Me on the other hand will always question a institute that says a disease can't be cured and rightly so.
It's fine to question it, as long as you have some basis for doing so. So far, you haven't shown us any.
If you knew how medicine ignores the body's natural immune response you to would be a little irritated.
Medicine does not ignore the natural immune response. In fact, vaccines, one of the most common medical treatments, are designed specifically to work with the immune system.
No they are not. They are rarely ever looked at. There are very few if any test designed to detect viruses. Most test used to diagnose viruses detect "indications" of viruses and never ever detect the actual virus.
This is so blatantly, staggeringly wrong that I don't even know where to start.
First of all, microscopes are common laboratory equipment in even the smallest, worst-funded medical offices. These microscopes can detect bacteria quite easily.
Secondly, when it comes to viruses, they can be seen through use of electron microscopes, NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. So once again we are brought back to the conclusion that the only thing you can mean is that everyone who has seen a virus, bacterium or other invader is lying. Is this what you are saying? If so, why do you think this?
I do not know about bacteria testing but from what I have heard they pretty much color a sample and if it turns one color they have a bacteria or virus and if it it doesn't they don't have it.
Do you have a source for this?
Nope, there are very few if any in a hospital or lab setting looking at pathogens and saying "there it is". They are looking at colors and other "indications" of the "possible" presence of the pathogen. And to shed more light on it the test results will say that this test in now way means you have the virus, bacteria or disease.
Nope testing for bacteria and viruses is more vague than the rest of medicine. You are all wrong. And I can't imagine anyone needing a microscope in a military hospital. I may have to question one's memory of the past, no offense.
No doctor would be stupid enough to say a person's immune system is incapable of curing a disease said to be incurable. NONE.
An "incurable" disease is one that cannot be cured. By anything. Understand? If it can be cured by the immune system, no doctor would say it was incurable in the first place.
No one cares about whether or not the pancreas produces insulin. I never ever said it didn't. I said we do not have proof.
And I said we do, unless you wish to state that every single person who has ever confirmed that they do through direct observation and testing is lying.
I personally believe the pancreas produces insulin. In your argumentative state you are missing pretty much all my points which makes me question why I am conversing with you.
Then explain what I'm missing.
Fungus being cancer, fungus causing OBs misdiagnosed as herpes, fungus causing strokes, fungus causing cerebral hemorrhaging, fungus causing psoriasis, eczema and and hundreds of other EASILY cured disease are being ignored entirely by medicine hence the reason YOU can't cure them.
You have presented zero evidence that they actually are fungi. You have merely asserted that they are. Repeatedly. But repetition does not equal truth. Where is your proof that they are fungi? Otherwise, you are just like the mainstream medicine you so despise, in that you ask us to take everything on faith.
The human immune system malfunction because of pathogens
So there are pathogenic infections which can cause it to malfunction. Why, then, can there not be a pathogenic infection which can cause the immune system to shut down completely, or simply be too powerful for it to destroy?
but IT NEVER EVER ATTACKS the body. The human immune system can completely restore itself.
Both of these claims go against the evidence. Again, I'd like to ask you about the possibility of genetic mutations negatively affecting the immune system. Do you accept that this is possible? If so, why can the negative mutation not cause it to turn against the body? If not, why not?
-Genetic mutations do not exist. If there is a mutation it is because there is a pathogen interfering with proper cell growth.
Now you are going up against everything we know about chemistry, molecular biology and... well, pretty much every field in science. Care to present your evidence for this?
-The human immune system can defeat all pathogens, infections including fungus. That is why the True Cures can cure all diseases.
If the human immune system can defeat all infections, including fungal ones, why did you need to create ShareCures in the first place? Why did cavemen get sick?
-There are no genetic diseases, only pathogens and parasites passed from mother to child, grandpa to child, brother to sister, sister to mother, cousin to neighbor.
Again, do you have any evidence for this?
Heck the only thing that will prevent anyone today from dying of what you believe is cancer
So everyone in the world has cancer?
is either they die of a stroke (still fungus)
Blood clot.
heart attack (could be any pathogen or parasite)
Likewise blood clot.
I don't know if you are here to argue with me or if you really want to know about your personal health.
I really want to know. I'm not trying to argue with you, but you have to understand the way that my mind works. I'm very analytical. I have to have evidence, a sound basis, for everything that I believe. I'm just asking you to provide your evidence to support your claims. If you can do that, I'll gladly believe you. Hell, I'll even participate in True Cures as a paying patient.
But you are going to have to pay better attention to what I am sharing because I am not going to continue to correct you when you are trying to summarize my claims.
I'm sorry. It's just hard to switch from believing everything I currently think I know to believing True Cures, and... well, no offense, but sometimes the things you say are confusing. Give me some time.