• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

how much of this can you read...

Not much for me.
But then the religious movement has been using this persecution crap since America was just a handfull of British colonies.
The ferverent religious were agitated when they saw that the framers of the Constitution failed to mention Jesus or Christianity in the document. Since then they tried to either force christian references into the U.S. government when ever there is turmoil (i.e. civil war, etc...) or spin it in, Glen Beckian style by pointing out "turn of phrases" such as "In the year of our lord". Which is more a reference to the Julien calander than a religious reference.

Ever vigilent we must be.
 
Another nutcase trying to twist reality to show that Darwin was promoting a religion. Pathetic. As to the question? I read the whole thing and still have all my hair. I laughed a bit, felt kind of sad... but it doesn't stress me. This is only a sign of how difficult it is becoming to believe in fairy tales as an educated adult in today's society. They are moved by fear, not by strength of conviction.

The culprit is not an evil atheist conspiracy, but the evident and widely known truth. This is a good thing.
 
Last edited:
I have always (and will always) find it deliciously ironical that people who believe in woo, criticize people who don't believe in woo by using the same things that define woo in the first place.

Just last night, a friend of mine who's a polytheist, stated that science is a modern "myth".


You know what? We don't call your beliefs "science" so please don't call science "beliefs".
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom