How many errors can a “truther” squeeze into three sentences?

[Lenbrazil]

From my blog

How many errors can a “truther” squeeze into three sentences?

If you are Michael Ruppert the answer is 5 to 6. This is neither new nor directly related to 9/11 but I recently started looking into it and it relates to the credibility of a leading “truther”. The passage below comes from his book Crossing the Rubicon and previously appeared in a From the Wilderness article...

http://lies-of-the-truth-movement.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-many-errors-can-truther-squeeze.html

 

[Sam.I.Am]

Read a Fark.com 9/11 thread. I'd use them for Stundies but at that place you never really know if someone is being serious or if they're trolling. 3 errors per sentence is nothing there.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

Especially when they don't include full stops and punctuation. Run-on sentences are ripe with freshly baked errors

 

[Oystein]

From my blog

How many errors can a “truther” squeeze into three sentences?

If you are Michael Ruppert the answer is 5 to 6. ...

http://lies-of-the-truth-movement.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-many-errors-can-truther-squeeze.html

I hate to be so pedantic, but you quoted 4, not 3 sentences, from Ruppert's book

 

[djlunacee]

I find "truthers" to be more like poker players, they are only lying when their lips are moving.

 

[Lenbrazil]

I hate to be so pedantic, but you quoted 4, not 3 sentences, from Ruppert's book

Thank's, you're right I corrected the blog entry.


So the question is was Ruppert lying or was he just sloppy or both?