Freethinker
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2005
- Messages
- 1,356
I am not sure at all that many believers have even pondered the questions that skeptics assume every individual has. A non-skeptic often assumes a correlation between a few facts and a theory is proof of an underlying cause of the correlation. After the non-skeptic has formed his view he is not motivated to revisit the issue. In fact, exactly the opposite. The non-skeptic has no particular interest in soul searching introspection to fight through his biases to arrive at views more consistent with absolute truth.
This is close to a thought I had considered including in the original post, but didn't. Many of these people have never considered the idea that they could be wrong. What kind of belief can it be when one never evaluates the alternatives? Can one truly be said to believe something that has been spoon-fed to them from birth on without them ever considering its factual basis? While this might pass Websters' definition of belief, I question whether this is the true belief that Christians claim is required to go to heaven.