How Loony are the Loons?
- Thread starter pomeroo
- Start date
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
They sell those little 100 ml bottles of Bailey's, at the Tampa game a few weeks ago I was mixing those w/ the hot chocolate.Yeah, how about that conspiracy to screw up my new year's eve plans by moving the game from noon to 7:15!Game time should end around 11, just enough time to mosey over to Kitty O'sheas. That's gonna be one ugly ass crowd lookin' for more boozin'! I plan on sneakin' in plenty of schnapps to mix with the hot chocolate.
Gonna be lots of extra tickets for the Packers game, people are dumping them like crazy because of the time change!
RemoveBush
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2006
- Messages
- 186
"If WTC 1 and 2 were brought down by demoliton, and the collapse started exactly at the point of aircraft impact, how did the explosive charges, at the point of aircraft impact, survive the impact and resulting explosion and fires? Hmmmmm?"
Who says they did???? Stop thinking in such a small small mindset.
Why does EVERYTHING have to have an IMMEDIATE solution?
"Since there were no terrorists, how did the government convince the aircrew to fly the aircraft into the WTC buildings? Hmmmmmm?"
Who says there were no terrorists? Putting words into ones mouth again?? First! A 757/767 are the first planes that can have their systems reconfigured to be controlled by another source. Another odity that ALL of the planes on this day were in fact a 757 or 767!
"Does this look like a controlled demolition to you?"
Not that particular clip, but then the camera was focused in tightly on one part who's to say? I have looked at most all of the video's out there and the explanations of both sides. Again, the ONLY plausible result given by the data and PHYSICS is CD.
Who says they did???? Stop thinking in such a small small mindset.
Why does EVERYTHING have to have an IMMEDIATE solution?
"Since there were no terrorists, how did the government convince the aircrew to fly the aircraft into the WTC buildings? Hmmmmmm?"
Who says there were no terrorists? Putting words into ones mouth again?? First! A 757/767 are the first planes that can have their systems reconfigured to be controlled by another source. Another odity that ALL of the planes on this day were in fact a 757 or 767!
"Does this look like a controlled demolition to you?"
Not that particular clip, but then the camera was focused in tightly on one part who's to say? I have looked at most all of the video's out there and the explanations of both sides. Again, the ONLY plausible result given by the data and PHYSICS is CD.
A W Smith
Philosopher
Horatius
NWO Kitty Wrangler
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 29,691
"If WTC 1 and 2 were brought down by demoliton, and the collapse started exactly at the point of aircraft impact, how did the explosive charges, at the point of aircraft impact, survive the impact and resulting explosion and fires? Hmmmmm?"
Who says they did???? We can't tell, because some twit won't use the quote function properly. Stop thinking in such a small small mindset.
Why does EVERYTHING have to have an IMMEDIATE solution? We don't want it immediately, we want if five years after the fact. You CTists have been screwing around doing nothing for five years.
"Since there were no terrorists, how did the government convince the aircrew to fly the aircraft into the WTC buildings? Hmmmmmm?"
Who says there were no terrorists? Putting words into ones mouth again?? First! A 757/767 are the first planes that can have their systems reconfigured to be controlled by another source. Another odity that ALL of the planes on this day were in fact a 757 or 767!
"Does this look like a controlled demolition to you?"
Not that particular clip, but then the camera was focused in tightly on one part who's to say? I have looked at most all of the video's out there and the explanations of both sides. Again, the ONLY plausible result given by the data and PHYSICS is CD. And what physics is that again, O Injunear?
Who says they did???? We can't tell, because some twit won't use the quote function properly. Stop thinking in such a small small mindset.
Why does EVERYTHING have to have an IMMEDIATE solution? We don't want it immediately, we want if five years after the fact. You CTists have been screwing around doing nothing for five years.
"Since there were no terrorists, how did the government convince the aircrew to fly the aircraft into the WTC buildings? Hmmmmmm?"
Who says there were no terrorists? Putting words into ones mouth again?? First! A 757/767 are the first planes that can have their systems reconfigured to be controlled by another source. Another odity that ALL of the planes on this day were in fact a 757 or 767!
"Does this look like a controlled demolition to you?"
Not that particular clip, but then the camera was focused in tightly on one part who's to say? I have looked at most all of the video's out there and the explanations of both sides. Again, the ONLY plausible result given by the data and PHYSICS is CD. And what physics is that again, O Injunear?
Dr. Lao
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2006
- Messages
- 415
Bears means old Soviet Union, they experimented with the Nazis (Titans) in Africa (Bengals), of course, the pope was involved (Cardinals) and Tesla (Chargers). It goes without saying that they were behind the Jets (Jets) going into the building built by the Steelers(Steelers) and were behind the Bush cabal (Texans) that killed the earlier regime (Oilers) because they knew too much about the aliens and their intelligence experiment with mammals (Dolphins).
They had a secret skull and bones club with a secret number (49ers), made up of the purest blood (Vikings), but the real higher ups (Chiefs) were actually working with the homosexuals (Packers) on building a race of supermen (Giants).
Come on, its in Revelations!
They had a secret skull and bones club with a secret number (49ers), made up of the purest blood (Vikings), but the real higher ups (Chiefs) were actually working with the homosexuals (Packers) on building a race of supermen (Giants).
Come on, its in Revelations!
RemoveBush
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2006
- Messages
- 186
"Three letters for you: D N A.
Case closed."
I see.... So a mans wife is killed, but because there is D.N.A in his house that matches him, then the polices theory that the husband did it is fulfiled without performing any other investigation into whether or not he could have done it?
Very logical and very much like the average attitude here! With that kind of approach, you better hope that you never get into any situation where something points to you but without further investigating the evidence that you could not have done it would not be discovered. Let's hope that YOU never experience YOUR type of actual solution to how the government should validate a situation, and how people should accept that information about you.
Case closed."
I see.... So a mans wife is killed, but because there is D.N.A in his house that matches him, then the polices theory that the husband did it is fulfiled without performing any other investigation into whether or not he could have done it?
Very logical and very much like the average attitude here! With that kind of approach, you better hope that you never get into any situation where something points to you but without further investigating the evidence that you could not have done it would not be discovered. Let's hope that YOU never experience YOUR type of actual solution to how the government should validate a situation, and how people should accept that information about you.
babazaroni
Muse
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2006
- Messages
- 787
"Three letters for you: D N A.
Case closed."
I see.... So a mans wife is killed, but because there is D.N.A in his house that matches him, then the polices theory that the husband did it is fulfiled without performing any other investigation into whether or not he could have done it?
Very logical and very much like the average attitude here! With that kind of approach, you better hope that you never get into any situation where something points to you but without further investigating the evidence that you could not have done it would not be discovered. Let's hope that YOU never experience YOUR type of actual solution to how the government should validate a situation, and how people should accept that information about you.
Checkout my brand new shiny signature.
Case closed."
I see.... So a mans wife is killed, but because there is D.N.A in his house that matches him, then the polices theory that the husband did it is fulfiled without performing any other investigation into whether or not he could have done it?
Very logical and very much like the average attitude here! With that kind of approach, you better hope that you never get into any situation where something points to you but without further investigating the evidence that you could not have done it would not be discovered. Let's hope that YOU never experience YOUR type of actual solution to how the government should validate a situation, and how people should accept that information about you.
Checkout my brand new shiny signature.
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
Especially the description of the Packers... good thing Starrman rarely posts any more!
Arus808
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 6,204
I vote that only Architect answers in his russian until this person knows how to use the quote function.
Over 100 posts and he hasn't had the courtesy to do one simple task, that requires less effort than his copying and pasting.
Why should we answer this person's question when he has shown us no courtesy whatsoever?
Kiwiwriter
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- May 22, 2006
- Messages
- 1,108
Try using the "quote function."
In other words...you are not presenting any documented proof, as shown by my highlighting.
Do you have proof that the US government instigated Israel's attack on the USS Liberty? No. Do you have proof that the DNA was tampered with? No. Do you have proof of what happened to these passengers? Who murdered them? How? When? Where? What was done with the bodies?
You are saying that the United States government, for weeks and months in advance, determined who would be flying on those four planes, researched their lives in painstaking detail, faked their final phone calls to a tight level, rounded up these passengers, massacred them, and then disposed of the bodies, with neither traces left behind, nor witnesses, nor a paper trail. This is a level of competence and secrecy that could only work in fiction, such as a James Bond movie.
Rubbish. All the great acts of massacre left behind all kinds of evidence, Holocaust deniers to the contrary...anecdotal, paper, and forensic. Even the killers themselves have confessed their misdeeds...Hoess shortly after the war, Eichmann years later. Your ideas would make a good movie, but little else. Of course, I wouldn't classify "Loose Change" as a good movie.
You are making these accusations, and then jettisoning your responsibility to prove your points by calling for "an independant investigation." (It's "independent," by the way. Accuracy depends on proper use of the English language, among other things). In other words, you have no proof beyond your belief that it's all a conspiracy. I guess to you, 9/11 is merely another manifestation of the same conspiracy theories you held before, as your references to "North Woods" and USS Liberty show.
Sorry, you're not going to play the trolling game with me. It's standard practice for internet trolls to make conspiratorial or defamatory statements, and then expect your internet interlocutors to prove your point or prove you wrong, thus putting them on the defense, and relieve you of the pesky burden of actually having to do work and provide evidence for your remarkable claims.
It's intellectually lazy and extremely dishonest. You are admitting that you have no proof for your assertions beyond your firm belief in them, and expecting that your interlocutors will do the hard work, and present you with that three-ring bound briefing book from the Grand Worshipful Master of Prince Hall Grand Masonic Lodge to President Bush, telling him and his staff how they are to accomplish the conspiracy theory you dream up. Wrong answer. I already did my Master's Thesis, thank you, and I don't have to do yours.
And the cell-phone issue has been dealt with elsewhere in this thread...those were Airphones, incidentally. And this level of fakery would require these omnipotent federal agents to know all these phone numbers, fake all these voices, fake all these personal conversational styles, and do so in a highly emotional situation...that requires not only a great deal of intelligence skills, but a lot of acting ability...and a lot of time in preparation. Do you think a government that couldn't do a good job of finding large weapons of mass destruction would be this capable of fakery? It's a silly idea, and you have no proof.
And as for "North Woods," you have been watching "Loose Change" a bit too much. The plan was suggested and never acted upon, and the general who dreamed it up went no further in his military career.
It's also worth noting that part of the planning and brainstorming process involves putting together a wide and wild variety of ideas, including some that are clearly off-the-wall, mostly to stimulate discussion or awareness of possibilities and scenarios. "North Woods" didn't get much past a conference, except for Dylan Avery's little film. Armies make plans. That's what they do in peacetime, when not square-bashing.
During the 1920s, the US developed "War Plan Red," for conflict with Britain and the Empire, in great detail. It called for mechanized advances on Ontario and Quebec, and the plan was refined several times through to 1932. Ultimately, the plan was filed away and then declassified (you can read about it in Military History Quarterly magazine), because of its unlikely nature. However, the studies used for the plan proved useful during World War II in working out transportation issues for supplying Canada and defending the continent, and it honed the planning skills of the officers who ultimately led the US Army to victory in Europe and the Pacific.
"North Woods" is interesting, but it's not relevant, except to conspiracy theorists.
No, you're going to have to do better than simply giving your "beliefs." You are making accusations that the United States government expended vast sums of money, time, energy, manpower, and man-hours to arrange the mass murder of thousands of people, including the airline passengers, doing so in total secrecy and at a level of government involvement that would by definition make secrecy difficult or even impossible. The Manhattan Project and Bletchley Park left paper trails. Your plan has not. The Holocaust left behind wrecked camps and witnesses. Your plan does not.
You will have to do better than that. And you will have to learn to use the "quote" key. And you will have to learn to spell. And you will have to learn to stop yelling. And you should also read a little more Kant and Descartes, and a little less conspiracy theory web pages.
D-minus. Try again.
In other words...you are not presenting any documented proof, as shown by my highlighting.
Do you have proof that the US government instigated Israel's attack on the USS Liberty? No. Do you have proof that the DNA was tampered with? No. Do you have proof of what happened to these passengers? Who murdered them? How? When? Where? What was done with the bodies?
You are saying that the United States government, for weeks and months in advance, determined who would be flying on those four planes, researched their lives in painstaking detail, faked their final phone calls to a tight level, rounded up these passengers, massacred them, and then disposed of the bodies, with neither traces left behind, nor witnesses, nor a paper trail. This is a level of competence and secrecy that could only work in fiction, such as a James Bond movie.
Rubbish. All the great acts of massacre left behind all kinds of evidence, Holocaust deniers to the contrary...anecdotal, paper, and forensic. Even the killers themselves have confessed their misdeeds...Hoess shortly after the war, Eichmann years later. Your ideas would make a good movie, but little else. Of course, I wouldn't classify "Loose Change" as a good movie.
You are making these accusations, and then jettisoning your responsibility to prove your points by calling for "an independant investigation." (It's "independent," by the way. Accuracy depends on proper use of the English language, among other things). In other words, you have no proof beyond your belief that it's all a conspiracy. I guess to you, 9/11 is merely another manifestation of the same conspiracy theories you held before, as your references to "North Woods" and USS Liberty show.
Sorry, you're not going to play the trolling game with me. It's standard practice for internet trolls to make conspiratorial or defamatory statements, and then expect your internet interlocutors to prove your point or prove you wrong, thus putting them on the defense, and relieve you of the pesky burden of actually having to do work and provide evidence for your remarkable claims.
It's intellectually lazy and extremely dishonest. You are admitting that you have no proof for your assertions beyond your firm belief in them, and expecting that your interlocutors will do the hard work, and present you with that three-ring bound briefing book from the Grand Worshipful Master of Prince Hall Grand Masonic Lodge to President Bush, telling him and his staff how they are to accomplish the conspiracy theory you dream up. Wrong answer. I already did my Master's Thesis, thank you, and I don't have to do yours.
And the cell-phone issue has been dealt with elsewhere in this thread...those were Airphones, incidentally. And this level of fakery would require these omnipotent federal agents to know all these phone numbers, fake all these voices, fake all these personal conversational styles, and do so in a highly emotional situation...that requires not only a great deal of intelligence skills, but a lot of acting ability...and a lot of time in preparation. Do you think a government that couldn't do a good job of finding large weapons of mass destruction would be this capable of fakery? It's a silly idea, and you have no proof.
And as for "North Woods," you have been watching "Loose Change" a bit too much. The plan was suggested and never acted upon, and the general who dreamed it up went no further in his military career.
It's also worth noting that part of the planning and brainstorming process involves putting together a wide and wild variety of ideas, including some that are clearly off-the-wall, mostly to stimulate discussion or awareness of possibilities and scenarios. "North Woods" didn't get much past a conference, except for Dylan Avery's little film. Armies make plans. That's what they do in peacetime, when not square-bashing.
During the 1920s, the US developed "War Plan Red," for conflict with Britain and the Empire, in great detail. It called for mechanized advances on Ontario and Quebec, and the plan was refined several times through to 1932. Ultimately, the plan was filed away and then declassified (you can read about it in Military History Quarterly magazine), because of its unlikely nature. However, the studies used for the plan proved useful during World War II in working out transportation issues for supplying Canada and defending the continent, and it honed the planning skills of the officers who ultimately led the US Army to victory in Europe and the Pacific.
"North Woods" is interesting, but it's not relevant, except to conspiracy theorists.
No, you're going to have to do better than simply giving your "beliefs." You are making accusations that the United States government expended vast sums of money, time, energy, manpower, and man-hours to arrange the mass murder of thousands of people, including the airline passengers, doing so in total secrecy and at a level of government involvement that would by definition make secrecy difficult or even impossible. The Manhattan Project and Bletchley Park left paper trails. Your plan has not. The Holocaust left behind wrecked camps and witnesses. Your plan does not.
You will have to do better than that. And you will have to learn to use the "quote" key. And you will have to learn to spell. And you will have to learn to stop yelling. And you should also read a little more Kant and Descartes, and a little less conspiracy theory web pages.
D-minus. Try again.
Wow, I see that 28th Kingd err uh, I mean RemoveBush still refuses to use the quote function. I think we should either not respond to him until he starts properly quoting, or not use quotes in any thread he's participating in...and it appears a number of people are already doing just that.
Yeah, but I've got a friend comin' into town who's been looking forward to this for months. Last game I was at was the Seattle Sunday night blowout. It was nice and warm.
Last year, I saw the season home finale vs. the Pack. Everyone thought it was gonna be Favre's last game. I also remember sneaking in a flask of Beam, some airplane bottles of schnapps and a big ol' thermos of spiced cider and beam (I was wearing a Marmot down jacket). We finished all the booze by halftime.
I just thought of a possible NFL conspiracy to screw up my New Year's Eve plan by moving the Bears-Pack game back. I went to high school with Jane Skinner who's married to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. Maybe I did something to piss off Jane back in the day and Jane is finally getting back at me. Jane's dad former White House Chief of Staff Sam Skinner was on the board of directors for the company I work for. Way to many coincidences to not be a conspiracy.
kookbreaker
Evil Fokker
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2001
- Messages
- 15,958
So when does this loon start screaming about what the QUEERS are DOING to the SOIL?
JimBenArm
Based on a true story!
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2006
- Messages
- 13,092
Navy Chiefs and NFL Chiefs!WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
Better bring more this time, they're cutting off alcohol sales at halftime!
All in an effort to get the Eagles to win the NFC East, how else do you explain the month they're having? Did you see the controlled demo they did to the Cowboys the other night?I just thought of a possible NFL conspiracy to screw up my New Year's Eve plan by moving the Bears-Pack game back. I went to high school with Jane Skinner who's married to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. Maybe I did something to piss off Jane back in the day and Jane is finally getting back at me. Jane's dad former White House Chief of Staff Sam Skinner was on the board of directors for the company I work for. Way to many coincidences to not be a conspiracy.
babazaroni
Muse
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2006
- Messages
- 787
It's great to see Jeff Garcia doing well again. The 49'ers should have dumped TO, instead of Garcia.
Last edited:
A W Smith
Philosopher
Funny thing on TV about a guy who in a obsessive compulsive sort of way "manages time" to the extreme. he has just enough clothes to wear only one time a month. he only ties his shoes on his commute to work at the first traffic light he stops at. He has every moment of time allocated for a month on a flow chart spreadsheet. He commutes only on off peak hours regardless of his hours of study. He eats only while in class (multitasking)heres the kicker. His girlfriend says hes Always late! Bahahahahah!!! and the punchline
hes an engunear!
hey RB your on TV!
hes an engunear!
hey RB your on TV!