How Loony are the Loons?

RemoveBush said:
"Then wouldn't airline Boeing jets filled with fuel suffise to demolish them? Isn't the controlled demolition unnecessary?"

Not according to the project manager. On tape says that he believes, not that means much, that the building would survive MULTIPLE airplane hits.
Click to expand...

Yeah, isn't it a shame he was wrong?
 
And there was no need for the buildings to collapse in the first place.

Three smoking icons and a thousand dead would be enough to incite war.
 
RemoveBUSH:

Once again, I know it is hectic, but I replied to you. Two pages have gone since then. When you get a little time, a response to my reply would be appreciated.

TAM:)
 
aggle-rithm said:
If I were to design a building, then I would probably make all sorts of grandiose claims about its ability to survive things that will probably never happen.
Click to expand...

I think I would claim it could withstand all possible plane crashes, controlled demolition, Star Wars death beams, nuclear attack, cruise missiles, Godzilla, and the musical stylings of David Hasselhoff just so the conspiracy nuts wouldn't have anything left.

After all, but this logic, if some guy said it can withstand something, it must be true!

I suppose they could always claim the buildings were really holograms.

pomeroo said:
No, he won't answer questions. I love betting on sure things.
Click to expand...

I am also quite fond of that. The CT posting pattern seems pretty well established here.
 
"Oh crap, I thought you asked about what fueled the fires? I did not account in my answer for you moving the goalposts afterwards. My bad."

I did, and I demonstrated why that ASSUMPTION was bogus. They are one in the same!

If NIST is unable to get similar results in a lab, how do you expect anyone to believe the fairytail that material in the building could cause these results? A lab is much more controlable and verifiable so it's results are more believable. Yet they could not get similar results......

You not to conserned about science it seems?
 
"Where were these alleged "questions" asked? I think you're serving yourself some easy questions to answer, so it looks like you'll be willing to answer questions when you're not. Please provide links to the post that presented these questions, or we'll just have to assume you faked them all."

Let's see..... A MAJOR airline crash and you think this is a question that HAS to be asked??? It is the DUTY of the NTSB to investigate EVERY plane crash. Identifying the aircraft 100% by the MANY traceable parts or the FDR's. NONE of this happened!

It's not a question I have to answer, but rather the government! Specifically why they did not do their job!

Your very ignorant aren't you?

"Oh, how convienient, you can't remember where you heard it!"

If you notice the FINAL comment in that sentence it says "I will look for it"! MORON, learn to read and comprehend!

"Perhaps you could explain why Mr. Silverstein would get himself involved in a long-term lease on a property that was about to be condemned? Is he just the worst billionaire landowner in history?"

Could it be that he was part of this plan?
 
RemoveBush said:
Here is the article that talks about the WTC's being in the "last throws if you will", of being condemmed.

Happy reading!

http://redlineav.com/tsg.deposition.contd.2.html
Click to expand...

From the above link:

Recently I heard from Tommy Malley, who claims his family are involved in New York City construction. Mr. Malley's testimony sounded very professional as he revealed knowledge of pre-bid information pertaining to the "Decomissioning of theTowers." (A phrase only he and myself have ever used.) Mr. Malley encouraged me to revise my figures, which brings forth a startling, and potentially critical new discovery, which I will quote:

"The owners were fully aware of the problem and had been given the ultimatum that they could not 'implode' the buildings. They received the report stating that: Decommissioning was required by the EPA by no later than 2007, at a projected cost of $20.B"

You consider this piece of crap evidence?

 
"Where were these alleged "questions" asked? I think you're serving yourself some easy questions to answer, so it looks like you'll be willing to answer questions when you're not. Please provide links to the post that presented these questions, or we'll just have to assume you faked them all."

Let's see..... A MAJOR airline crash and you think this is a question that HAS to be asked??? It is the DUTY of the NTSB to investigate EVERY plane crash. Identifying the aircraft 100% by the MANY traceable parts or the FDR's. NONE of this happened!

It's not a question I have to answer, but rather the government! Specifically why they did not do their job!

Your very ignorant aren't you?

"Oh, how convienient, you can't remember where you heard it!"

If you notice the FINAL comment in that sentence it says "I will look for it"! MORON, learn to read and comprehend!

"Perhaps you could explain why Mr. Silverstein would get himself involved in a long-term lease on a property that was about to be condemned? Is he just the worst billionaire landowner in history?"

Could it be that he was part of this plan?
 
RemoveBush said:
Here is the article that talks about the WTC's being in the "last throws if you will", of being condemmed.

Happy reading!

http://redlineav.com/tsg.deposition.contd.2.html
Click to expand...

From the above link:

Recently I heard from Tommy Malley, who claims his family are involved in New York City construction. Mr. Malley's testimony sounded very professional as he revealed knowledge of pre-bid information pertaining to the "Decomissioning of theTowers." (A phrase only he and myself have ever used.) Mr. Malley encouraged me to revise my figures, which brings forth a startling, and potentially critical new discovery, which I will quote:

"The owners were fully aware of the problem and had been given the ultimatum that they could not 'implode' the buildings. They received the report stating that: Decommissioning was required by the EPA by no later than 2007, at a projected cost of $20.B"

You consider this piece of crap evidence?

 
RemoveBush said:
Here is the article that talks about the WTC's being in the "last throws if you will", of being condemmed.
Click to expand...

Do you have additional corroborating evidence to this unverified witness testimony? Do you have a signed piece of testimony, along with verification that this person is who they say they are, and that they are in a position to know all this? Do you have verification for some of the more outlandish claims he makes (20 billion dollars to demolish the building).

The statement mentions other engineers speaking about this, do you have evidence of this?

It seems that galvanic corrosion requires the presence of an electrolye in addition to two dissimilar metals. Do you have additional evidence that this is what caused the WTC towers to be in the "last throws"[sic]?

Silverstein lost a substantial amount of money in the destruction of the towers (especially because the insurers got the attack ruled as one event for payment purposes). Could you please provide evidence showing they were falling apart and needed to be condemned? Can you provide evidence for the need to dismantle the towers, along with the cost for doing so?

I would really prefer information from the parties involved, or from verifiable sources rather than conspiracy web sites. If you can find and cite peer reviewed evidence (such as a engineering journal describing the problems with the towers, if such problems indeed existed), that would be even better.

Do you realize that going down the "the towers were falling apart" road makes it much harder for you to argue that they should've stood up against a plane crash?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom