How Can We Arrange a Debate?

[skepticalcriticalguy]

I suspect Tarpley feels your audience is so small that it is not worth the effort.

I suspect Tarpley would discuss such abstract things as historical/economical/geopolitical context. Mark and Ron would say things like "prove each and every thing you're saying scientifically, or it didn't happen!" Tarpley would get bored and leave, and go do Paula Gloria's show instead.

 

[skepticalcriticalguy]

How about Alice Hoglan or Todd Beamer's widow versus those you mention...hmmm...pathetic.

I hear Lisa Beamer is hard to get ahold of. You have to go through her press agent, who tells you she isn't doing media. (So why have a press agent then?) Victor Thorne of Wing TV tried to interview her.

 

[Jaguar]

I suspect Tarpley would discuss such abstract things as historical/economical/geopolitical context. Mark and Ron would say things like "prove each and every thing you're saying scientifically, or it didn't happen!" Tarpley would get bored and leave, and go do Paula Gloria's show instead.

I agree.

The problem with the traitors, who parrot the official lie, is that they just take individual claims and muddy the waters on them a bit. Then they run round the blogs claiming they pwned someone and debunked everything they said.

These misfits have no concept of a bigger picture. Webster Tarpley would make mincemeat of them.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

I never cease to be amazed at the similarities between Conspiracy Fantasists and Christian Fundamentalists.

 

[skepticalcriticalguy]

These misfits have no concept of a bigger picture. Webster Tarpley would make mincemeat of them.

He would in a discussion, not a debate. He would talk about the "shadow government, the secret team, the rogue network," and could lecture them for 3 hours straight about it, but they would want to get down to acetylene torches and such.

 

[skepticalcriticalguy]

I never cease to be amazed at the similarities between Conspiracy Fantasists and Christian Fundamentalists.

I feel the same way about those who believe the mass media/government about all they are told, and Christian Fundamentalists.

 

[chipmunk stew]

He would in a discussion, not a debate. He would talk about the "shadow government, the secret team, the rogue network,"

But would never name names, give a shred of hard evidence, or explain how they operate.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

I feel the same way about those who believe the mass media/government about all they are told, and Christian Fundamentalists.

Ah, but what do you feel about people that do not take things at face value, but still come to a different conclusion that you do?

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

But would never name names, give a shred of hard evidence, or explain how they operate.

Not unlike:

 

[skepticalcriticalguy]

If you guys want to take on a 20-something student, forget Avery and Bermas. Daniel Abrahamson of False Flag News is far more informed and eloquent.

 

[skepticalcriticalguy]

Ah, but what do you feel about people that do not take things at face value, but still come to a different conclusion that you do?

Actually, I respect them more than you do.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Actually, I respect them more than you do.

Now I think you're projecting.

 

[skepticalcriticalguy]

Now I think you're projecting.

Is that like remote viewing?

 

[Myriad]

Not unlike:

OMG!! Where did you get that footage? You can clearly see the white-painted 757 knocking over four polar bears and then pulling up and flying over the igloo just as the burst of talcum powder goes off, during a blizzard! Finally, the smoking gun we've been looking for!

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[T.A.M.]

Ah yes, Mrs Beamer, she really has milked the teat of 911 till it's dry hasn't she. Im sure she would love the extra publicity of Hardfire.

I'm sure Griffin woul;d be simply perplexed by this kind offer of debate by a Tour Guide. That's all he is. One who knows how to deny things.

Ron has no intention of inviting Griffin on. He claimed he couldn't find contact details. I found them on google in 30 seconds.

I would love to see you say that to her face. Your ignorance and level of disrespect is absolutely horrible.

Griffin - Well read on 9/11
Roberts - Well read on 9/11

Griffin - Theologian
Roberts - Tour Guide

How on earth is either one, based on their self education on 9/11 or their "other careers" better than the other to debate the issues?

TAM

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

OMG!! Where did you get that footage? You can clearly see the white-painted 757 knocking over four polar bears and then pulling up and flying over the igloo just as the burst of talcum powder goes off, during a blizzard! Finally, the smoking gun we've been looking for!

Respectfully,
Myriad

The hell? It should've gone here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pMwSqqc9Ws

 

[Alareth]

I would love to see you say that to her face. Your ignorance and level of disrespect is absolutely horrible.

Griffin - Well read on 9/11
Roberts - Well read on 9/11

Griffin - Theologian
Roberts - Tour Guide

How on earth is either one, based on their self education on 9/11 or their "other careers" better than the other to debate the issues?

TAM

I'm more likely to listen to a tour guide. He can actually point at real things as he talks.

 

[T.A.M.]

I'm more likely to listen to a tour guide. He can actually point at real things as he talks.

lol...I see your S.D.S. is working well this evening.

TAM

 

[Miragememories]

I'm more likely to listen to a tour guide. He can actually point at real things as he talks.

Surely you mean spin guide?

MM

 

[pomeroo]

Send a PM to one of the admins, like Lisa Simpson.

I liked Sander Hicks personally when I met him; he was very pleasant. Unfortunately, I don't know if his version of the 9-11 CT is debatable without getting into really exotic areas. For example, when I asked him if Mohammed Atta was on Flight 11, his response was, 'Yes, he was the lead hijacker." That certainly marks him as one of the few 9-11 Deniers to assert that. OTOH, his book, The Big Wedding, is chock full of nonsense from Daniel Hopsicker to Leo Wanta.

Apparently his new book (forgetting the name) claims that Barry Goldwater was behind the assassination of JFK. So a debate with him would not lack for nuttiness,

but whether it's representative of 9-11 Denial is another matter.

This is fabulous! As an example of how a paranoid mind can turn reality upside down, this one's hard to top. Not only was Goldwater close with JFK on a personal level, but he thought he could beat him in 1964. After the assassination, Goldwater was ready to drop out of the race. He detested Lyndon Johnson, who he regarded as a dirty campaigner. Furthermore, he knew that the country would never accept three different Presidents within a year and a half. JFK's death ruined Goldwater as a national figure.