House Impeachment Inquiry

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here are just some of Trump's staff, appointees and associates who have said or suggested Trump is stupd.


Sam Nunberg describes his ignorance. Nunberg, was sent to “explain the Constitution” to Trump when he was a candidate. “I got as far as the Fourth Amendment,” Nunberg recalled, “before his finger is pulling down on his lip and his eyes are rolling back in his head.”

Steve Bannon " like an 11 year old child"
White House deputy chief of staff Katie Walsh "Working with Trump is “like trying to figure out what a child wants”—

Rupert Murdoch "a ******* idiot"
Roger Ailes. 'a moron"
Rex Tillerson Secretary of State "a ******* moron"
Gary Cohen Economic advisor "dumb as ****"
H R McMaster National security advisor "a dope"
John Kelly Chief of staff "an idiot"
Steve Mnuchin Secretary of Treasury "an idiot"
Reince Preibus Chief of staff "an idiot"
Sam Nunberg "he's an idiot"

There are lots more. But as I said before. Read his speeches. They really are stupid. And yet people voted for this moron.

You should also note that Trump has threatened legal action against every school he's attended. If Trump is really "a stable genius" why is he frightened of evidence?


A great listicle there. :thumbsup::)
 
Belz, theprestige

I don't care if you two resolve your issues in private messages, another thread, or a seedy motel room that charges by the hour. As long this nonsense stops getting dragged into other threads multiple times, I'll be happy. Please just stop.
 
Dr. Keith liked the post:
Belz, theprestige

I don't care if you two resolve your issues in private messages, another thread, or a seedy motel room that charges by the hour. As long this nonsense stops getting dragged into other threads multiple times, I'll be happy. Please just stop.
 
Democrats to subpoena Gordon Sondland, after the State Department blocked his voluntary testimony

Sondland had interacted directly with Trump around the time of the Ukraine phone call, and was the man who told Ron Johnson that the phone call had involved quid pro quo.

This is how Trump responded on twitter: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1181560708808486914

I would love to send Ambassador Sondland, a really good man and great American, to testify, but unfortunately he would be testifying before a totally compromised kangaroo court, where Republican’s rights have been taken away, and true facts are not allowed out for the public....

....to see. Importantly, Ambassador Sondland’s tweet, which few report, stated, “I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo’s of any kind.” That says it ALL!
 
I wonder if they found any dirt

Does anyone know what kind of dirt they were looking for? Obviously they had to have a hunch of something before risking everything.
 
Does anyone know what kind of dirt they were looking for? Obviously they had to have a hunch of something before risking everything.
Not at all. You're assuming they give a crap about the truth.

The point of the investigation was to have an investigation. Propagandists could take care of the rest, accusing Biden of everything under the sun and especially the crimes Giuliani was currently in Ukraine committing. It almost worked, too, even with the whistleblower calling attention to it.

As for "before risking everything," I'll put ten bucks down that Trump has asked everyone to do something similar, in every single negotiation.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know what kind of dirt they were looking for? Obviously they had to have a hunch of something before risking everything.

It goes back to a Alt-Right Wing Conspiracy Theory that Hunter was hired by Burisma for nefarious purposes and was paid extreme amounts of money to hide Burisma's corrupt practices and then Joe Biden had the prosecutor who was "looking into" Burisma's supposed corruption fired so as to protect both his son and the company. There is also claim that the company that Hunter set up with several others, acting as a go-between for Chinese investors wanting to invest in the US, were involved in money laundering and fraud.

There is no actual evidence of either claim, and in fact a lot of evidence that is contradictory to them.
 
Does anyone know what kind of dirt they were looking for? Obviously they had to have a hunch of something before risking everything.
The whole matter is out in the open and other than Biden being too close to the oil industry, there's nothing there.

That doesn't stop Trump or the GOP from shouting accusations from the roof tops which then stick in many people's heads.
 
No, it was right the first time. Democrats in the House keep slowly plodding through the motions, each time pretending that this time, THIS time, their chamber will be shown the respect it deserves. If they understood that Trump is going to block everything, they'd have had a subpoena in hand for what's his name's deposition. You're not allowed to testify now? Okay, here's some paperwork, we order you to testify... now.

The Trump administration has obstructed and intimidated every single witness so far. There is every indication they will continue to do so, even with subpoenas, even with impeachment. They need to understand that and plan for it, not simply act outraged every time Lucy pulls the football away and back up for another run at it.
 
The House Committees should hold uncooperating witnesses in contempt, fine them $5,000 a day and send the bill to Trump, personally.
That will get him to cooperate.
 
The House Committees should hold uncooperating witnesses in contempt, fine them $5,000 a day and send the bill to Trump, personally.
That will get him to cooperate.

No, they should hold them in contempt, arrest them and fine them.
 
The House Committees should hold uncooperating witnesses in contempt, fine them $5,000 a day and send the bill to Trump, personally.
That will get him to cooperate.

Why would he care about this bill?

His SOP is to decree that he doesn't have to pay for things like the little people do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom