Cont: House Impeachment Inquiry - part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why speculate when you can just check his twitter?
Mango Menace said:
The @foxnewPolls, always inaccurate, are heavily weighted toward Dems. So ridiculous - same thing happened in 2016. They got it all wrong. Get a new pollster!
I want nothing whatever to do with Donny's twitter feed. I might get herpes or something just reading it.

And he's going the "Fake News" option, then. Sorta guessed it, but in no way do I feel like that's a "win".
 
Graham is acting as the father-figure here, trying to get Trump to just go with a quick vote and a quick win instead of entering into a 6-8 week trial to try to get even. I'm with Lindsey.
Graham is the supplicant child here, not the adult. What kind of glasses you need to wear not to see that eludes me. Graham is simply projecting back to Trump what he thinks Trump wants.
 

but this is the same Lindsay who invited Guiliani to testify before the Senate Committee, potentially ******* up Rudis and Trump's defense.

Maybe he is suffering from Schizophrenia?
 
but this is the same Lindsay who invited Guiliani to testify before the Senate Committee, potentially ******* up Rudis and Trump's defense.

Maybe he is suffering from Schizophrenia?

Nope. He wants to do that once the trial is over:

In an interview airing on “Face the Nation“ Sunday, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman said that Giuliani, who is serving as the president’s personal attorney, could appear before his committee separately from the impending Senate impeachment trial.

“Rudy, if you want to come and tell us what you found, I'll be glad to talk to you,” Graham said. “We can look at what Rudy's got and Joe Biden, Hunter Biden and anything else you want to look at after impeachment. But if Rudy wants to come to the Judiciary Committee and testify about what he found, he's welcome to do so.”

Given that Giuliani went to Ukraine looking for dirt on the Bidens and told Trump in a leaked phonecall (and Trump then told the press) that he had "good information", that'll be what Graham is after him publicly testifying to. But only after the impeachment is over.
 
Rudy Giuliani Tweeted

@RudyGiuliani
Budapest | Kiev | Vienna

After hundreds of hours & months of research, I have garnered witnesses & documents which reveal the truth behind this impeachment, which includes NO wrongdoing by @realDonaldTrump
These threads only touch the surface. Read & watch all. More to come.

Evidence revealed that corruption in 2016 was so extensive it was POTUS’s DUTY to ask for US-Ukraine investigation.
Impeachment is part of Dem cover-up.
Extortion, bribery & money laundering goes beyond Biden’s.
Also, DNC collusion w/ Ukraine to destroy candidate Trump.

You can question a witnesses credibility but you cannot question hard documentary evidence, which each firsthand witness part of this investigation provide.

Witness Viktor Shokin:
Holds doc’s proving money laundering by Burisma & Biden’s.
Fired due to VP Biden’s threat not to release $1B in vital US aid.
Shokin’s med records show he was poisoned, died twice, and was revived.
Lots of heads will roll in Ukraine if this opens up.

Witness Yuri Lutsenko, inheritor of Shokin’s office:
Records proving Amb Yovanovitch perjured herself at least twice.
Doc’s showing she was denying visas to witnesses who could prove Biden & Dem corruption.
Clear doc proof of money laundering by Burisma & Biden’s.

Dem’s impeachment for innocent conduct is intended to obstruct the below investigations of Obama-era corruption:
- Billions of laundered $
- Billions, mostly US $, widely misused
- Extortion
- Bribery
- DNC collusion w/ Ukraine to destroy candidate Trump

Much more to come.
 
Last edited:
The House has brought two additional Articles of Impeachment:

  • Making three speeches with intent to "attempt to bring into disgrace, ridicule, hatred, contempt and reproach, the Congress of the United States".
  • Bringing disgrace and ridicule to the presidency by his aforementioned words and actions.


On February 24, 1868, but I think they fit Trump perfectly
 
The House has brought two additional Articles of Impeachment:

  • Making three speeches with intent to "attempt to bring into disgrace, ridicule, hatred, contempt and reproach, the Congress of the United States".
  • Bringing disgrace and ridicule to the presidency by his aforementioned words and actions.


On February 24, 1868, but I think they fit Trump perfectly

Watching the LegalEagle Youtube Channel's breakdown of the various impeachments?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom