• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Hotdogs, pasta and child sex trafficking / Hilda and Epstein's Lolita island / Clickb

icebear said:
Laura Silbsy has never done anything which should have made Hillary Clinton or anybody HC associates with aware of her existence. Nonetheless, the name Silsby does in fact occur in a number of those Wikileaks emails involving Cheryl Mills and Hillary:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3465

Which makes it clear that hillary and her entourage cared quite a bit about Silsby. In fact the state dept. itself might have been concerned over Americans being arrested in Haiti or DR but there's no way in the world that Hillary's name should be seen on any of those emails.
Click to expand...


From that message alone, all Killary has to do with it is being forwarded "for your information" about a prepared State Department statement and the identity of the two US citizens still held in custody by Haiti.
 
This is so imbecilic that we may as well fast forward to lizard people.

Don't let that stop you.
 
icebear said:
You'll be seeing the stuff about Hildabeast and Epstein on regular news channels before the weekend is out.
Click to expand...

Like Hillary was supposed to be jailbird by week's end in your previous thread? I mean, it is not Sunday yet, but it should be already obvious that this thing is pile of bovine manure. Like everything posted by conservatives here, actually.

icebear said:
Gonna get better.... Anonymous and Wikileaks claim they have photographs of SlicKKK KKKlintler and other govt. officials doing sex with children and will release today.
Click to expand...

If/when they don't release it, can I expect retraction and apologies for spreading smear and lies...? Haha, no, who I am kidding.

It is almost like rabid rethuglican loons are making up BS about political opponent. :rolleyes:
 
Even if Hillary were dyed deep in strange sins, it's certainly not the place of the "FBI, the Pentagon, all of the intel agencies, and the NYPD" to "band together" to interfere in a presidential election. Even if she were completely and total evil, and all these agencies completely and utterly good, it would still be a very bad thing indeed if they were to do anything like what you are suggesting. It'd be like the Jedi deciding to take out Palpatine when he was chancellor by using their powers to compel the senate to unseat him. An "enlightened" dictatorship by a cabal is in no way better than a democracy, however misguided the voters were in electing their officials.
 
His hand was forced, I think. If he didn't reveal it, he could be accused of trying to shove things under a seated beagle's bottom until after the election.
 
Trump hookers lined up for election night. One for each state he wins, coming out from behind the curtain as each state is announced.
 
Trump has also palled around with Epstein and the same, as of yet unproven in a court of law, legal cloud also envelopes him, so there's that:

http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/

In other words, nobody's got jack on anybody yet and it's all the same election year craziness and mud slinging as has been going on this year. Only in this case one side wants to sling the poo at Clinton while forgetting Trump is in the same monkey pen.
 
Last edited:
icebear said:
The FBI, the Pentagon, all of the intel agencies, and the NYPD have banded together and determined that they are not going to tolerate another four years of the present misgovernment starting in January and that Hillary is not going to be president.
Click to expand...

If I understand well the content of this article what worries the most the intel agencies is the idea to have Donald Trump at the oval office. Ahd this idea does not only worry US intel agencies but also allied intel agencies, including the UK ones : http://europe.newsweek.com/donald-t...ary-clinton-united-states-europe-516895?rm=eu

But is there really a reason to worry? Donald knows better than all of them...
 
icebear said:
Gonna get better.... Anonymous and Wikileaks claim they have photographs of SlicKKK KKKlintler and other govt. officials doing sex with children and will release today.
Click to expand...



Yeah, right. In what world does it make sense for a group that has actual evidence that would be enough to put people in jail all by itself, to withhold that evidence, and instead release a few innocuous e-mails that are nothing more than routine communications that happen to mention a particular name?

Come on, if you've got The Bomb, you drop The Bomb. Why the **** would any sane person do anything else?
 
Childlike Empress said:
In case you missed it over all that Snopes babble, from yesterday: Woman suing Trump over alleged teen rape drops suit, again

The but..but..but Trump nonsense is off-topic here as it is mostly everywhere, btw.
Click to expand...

It's all nonsense. In Trump's case, if you read to the bottom the Trump side is still not finished, and he's into the same circles just as deep as Slick Willie, who BTW is not even running for President, so it's even more ludicrous to bring up something to smear Hillary with without including Trump. They are both hanging out in the same cloud in this.
 
LSSBB said:
It's all nonsense. In Trump's case, if you read to the bottom the Trump side is still not finished, and he's into the same circles just as deep as Slick Willie, who BTW is not even running for President, so it's even more ludicrous to bring up something to smear Hillary with without including Trump. They are both hanging out in the same cloud in this.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Whatever Bill did with Jeffrey Epstein, we know that Trump and Epstein were not strangers and that Trump called Jeffrey Epstein a "terrific guy" and commented that Jeffrey Epstein might like beautiful women as much as he does and that they tend to be on the young side.

Whether or not any of the allegations are actually true, we can be sure that Jeffrey Epstein would be a campaign issue if this issue applied to only one of the candidates.
 
As it was Tony who forwarded Abramovic's "Spirit Cooking" invitation to John, I did a Google Images search to see if he is an as-charming man as his little brother. Wasn't disappointed to find this portrait in word and picture of him and his ex-wife Heather. Worth a read. Both of them also top lobbyists of the Democratic Party. What a "nice" bunch of people. On topic:

National Review said:
One story they liked to tell took place in 2004, when the guests at their northern-Virginia home, near Lake Barcroft, walked into a bedroom festooned with the works of Katy Grannan, “a photographer known for documentary-style pictures of naked teenagers in their parents’ suburban homes.” The guests were shocked. But oh, how Tony and Heather laughed.
Click to expand...
 
Childlike Empress said:
As it was Tony who forwarded Abramovic's "Spirit Cooking" invitation to John, I did a Google Images search to see if he is an as-charming man as his little brother. Wasn't disappointed to find this portrait in word and picture of him and his ex-wife Heather. Worth a read. Both of them also top lobbyists of the Democratic Party. What a "nice" bunch of people. On topic:
Click to expand...

Wow! You're sure gonna be glad when this is over, eh? You'll get to stop citing right wing hit pieces as though they're newsworthy.

What does Tony Podesta's ex-wife's art collection have to do with anything?

But, hey... it gets quoted on Infowars; can't be all bad, right?
 
Foolmewunz said:
Wow! You're sure gonna be glad when this is over, eh? You'll get to stop citing right wing hit pieces as though they're newsworthy.

What does Tony Podesta's ex-wife's art collection have to do with anything?

But, hey... it gets quoted on Infowars; can't be all bad, right?
Click to expand...

Because most normal people don't have naked kids as art on their walls? :eek:
 
Foolmewunz said:
Wow! You're sure gonna be glad when this is over, eh? You'll get to stop citing right wing hit pieces as though they're newsworthy.

What does Tony Podesta's ex-wife's art collection have to do with anything?

But, hey... it gets quoted on Infowars; can't be all bad, right?
Click to expand...


#DrainTheSwamp
 
logger said:
Because most normal people don't have naked kids as art on their walls? :eek:
Click to expand...

You've seen the pictures, have you? Or do you just accept what some right wing sniper says about them?

Don't bother answering; that's a rhetorical question.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom