Horizontal Ejections and Squibs

You are getting mixed up. You're theory doesn't go against the NIST theory possibly, but the theory that there were air vents and not windows that the air escaped from is clearly a point that would have been addressed by NIST.
This is what you quoted me on, and this is what i was discussing.

NIST explanation that you posted is absolutely horrible. As is Beachnut's. How can one possibly believe that the ejected material is only air. It is clearly a huge mass of dust and pulverized material. I don't get it.
Are you just a troll?, you be leaving out the dust. Good for you, move the goal post.

AIR is the cause of what you call "squibs". If you want to leave out the dust then fine, I can see the dust in the air, and you call it "squibs" out of ignorance.

Air causes your fantasy of explosives! Failure to make a point, but, if you used had physics skill as good as your baiting skills you would not be a truther who lack massive amount of evidence. Zero evidence.

You want to pedal explosive, you have no evidence. Perfection for 9/11 truth.

There is a dust study you missed. Why can't you bring facts to the table?


I understand 9/11 truth lacks the ability to grasp this, you clearly were boasting about your physics skill implying others need come prepared, so you must not be like 9/11 truth, whose only goal backfires as they expose their ignorance on 9/11 issues.

A grade school education is all that is needed to combat 9/11 truth tactics and do better than I. 9/11 truth ignores facts and manufactures lies. You would think if 9/11 truth had skills in math, physics and engineering as good as they are at ignoring evidence, 9/11 truth would not be spewing lack of understand on squibs. I am learning much from you.

You make a point, if someone leaves out "dust" in the air of the "squibs", 9/11 truth calls it a smoking gun, but only for exposing pure ignorance. Good job keeping people on target with your literal corrections, and inability to understand things, so you can keep your woo movement going. Good job.
 
Last edited:
As soon as you realize that there is no good explanation, the easier it is to rationalize the use of explosives.
So that's what they teach you in engineering school...if you can't explain something, use explosives. Choo-Choo Charlie was an engineer...
 
The covert maintenance workers probably had easy access to the maintence floors to plant squibs on the outer columns.
Why would they plant movie special effects in the WTC...and you expect any thinking person to believe your an engineering student!!!!!!


BTW, maintence is spelled maintenance.
 
Why would they plant movie special effects in the WTC...and you expect any thinking person to believe your an engineering student!!!!!!


BTW, maintence is spelled maintenance.

Typing fatigue probably. Btw, when you resort to pointing out typos, that is a sure sign of nitpicking and failing to contribute to the conversation due to lack of knowledge or intelligence.

I view the squibs as evidence of explosives. As for the poster who wants a source for my claim that squibs are demolition devices, i would like to direct him to wikipedia for a start.


Beachnut, you said the squibs are AIR.

AIR you say. AIR.

You keep saying AIR.
AIR AIR AIR.

guess what, i don't see AIR. i see pulverized material, most likely much of which is concrete.. If you think this is insignificant then you are in denial.

Here is a good video, maybe some of you have seen it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wpPb3dWARk

THIS is what i want explained.

It has a nice truther background track to make it all the more dramatic too. A nice rendition of "imagine" by A Perfect Circle.
 
Typing fatigue probably. Btw, when you resort to pointing out typos, that is a sure sign of nitpicking and failing to contribute to the conversation due to lack of knowledge or intelligence.
Nah...it has something to do with the fact that I think you lied about being an engineering student.
I view the squibs as evidence of explosives.
Exhibit 1 that you are not an engineering student.
As for the poster who wants a source for my claim that squibs are demolition devices, i would like to direct him to wikipedia for a start.
Exhibit 2 that you are not an engineering student.
guess what, i don't see AIR. i see pulverized material, most likely much of which is concrete..
Exhibit 3 that you are not an engineering student.
 
. Btw, when you resort to pointing out typos, that is a sure sign of nitpicking and failing to contribute to the conversation due to lack of knowledge or intelligence.
Btw, when you resort to pointing out semantics, that is a sure sign of nitpicking and failing to contribute to the conversation due to lack of knowledge or intelligence and pure bs woo of 9/11 truth! Good job... pot

not of engineering r u, or u would know...

Fantasy squibs, caused by AIR, not proof of explosives.

...
Here is a good video, maybe some of you have seen it. ...
What a pathetic video, and to a John Lennon song. What an insult. Take a murdered NYC resident and use his song as back ground for making up pure lies concerning other murdered NYC residents. Good job, sick post of the day. Pure stupidity. Who lacks so much knowledge to make such crap?

Pathetic video. But great post..
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by papasmurf
A squib is a demolition device.



No a squib is that waxy glob on the end of a cotton swab or "q tip" a truther pulls out of his ear that prevents them from listening.


Makes about as much sense
 
I view the squibs as evidence of explosives.
Why? What do the "squibs" do when you're also proposing an enormous amount of explosives in the center of each floor, which for some reason don't make any noise when they go off. This is stupid beyond comprehension.

As for the poster who wants a source for my claim that squibs are demolition devices, i would like to direct him to wikipedia for a start.
:dl:


How are those calculations coming young engineering student? When is the physics going to be introduced as you promised?
 
You call it semantics, i call it you spewing misinformation.

What is your point by saying it's only air? Quit being a cry baby and tell me why it's unimportant that matter was ejected from the building other than air?

You guys can accuse me of lying about being an engineering student, like its unheard of for someone to question the official story and be an engineer...

I am studying biomedical and computer engineering.

AHAH! you will say. I know nothing about structural engineering or any of that stuff!

Well, actually my first two years here are engineering core, common to all engineers, so i have taken statics, physics, and materials, and design. The other guy from Stevens here can affirm that.

Do you want me to post my transcript or something... i'd really rather not because you would then attack me for bragging or something like that.

So are we going to stop accusing me of lying about my education?
 
I never promised, quite distorting reality as usual. I said i might decide to try some calculations.

Unfortunately, i am taking summer classes because i am double majoring, you see. So i really don't have time at the moment, but maybe i will get around to it. I do believe there are articles that reject your notion of these ejections by the piledriver-piston theory.

For the 3490328947 time, these squibs do not occur on every floor, they occur mainly at the reinforced maintenance floors, i believe there were additional explosions in the core of the building, and that the squibs were planted further from the core.
 
You call it semantics, i call it you spewing misinformation.
...
Yes, that is what you so, when you say your fantasy squibs are proof of explosives. Failed ideas and pure misinformation, picked up from 9/11 truth and repeated without evidence.

You are so right again.


Maybe you are a student, good for u...

but you are right, the truth movement has 0.00087 of all the world engineers working and taking action to ....

What was it... Oh noes, I forgot...

Now let me see…
The p4t have no theories, the engineers for the movement sign a petition saying the have "ample evidence" for something, but like your fantasy squib explosive faulty idea, they have zero evidence except in their minds.

Sally forth, do good making up false ideas!
 
Last edited:
Yes, that is what you so, when you say your fantasy squibs are proof of explosives. Failed ideas and pure misinformation, picked up from 9/11 truth and repeated without evidence.

You are so right again.


Maybe you are a student, good for u...


Did you watch the video? I assure you they are not fantasy. And to settle the semantics and for ease of argument, let's just call those ejections "squibs" from now on, even if you think they aren't actually squibs, okay?
 
For the 3490328947 time, these squibs do not occur on every floor, they occur mainly at the reinforced maintenance floors, i believe there were additional explosions in the core of the building, and that the squibs were planted further from the core.
Exhibit 4 that you are not an engineering student.
 
let's just call those ejections "squibs" from now on, even if you think they aren't actually squibs, okay?
Exhibit 5 that you are not an engineering student. now why should we stop saying you are not an engineering student? Then again, there is always a possibility that you flunked out of Stevens...
 
Did you watch the video? I assure you they are not fantasy. And to settle the semantics and for ease of argument, let's just call those ejections "squibs" from now on, even if you think they aren't actually squibs, okay?
The movie sucks. Air, you failed to gain knowledge.

so i have taken statics, physics, and materials, and design. ...

The truth?,
cellphone.jpg
papasmurf, here is a prepaid cell phone. Take it, call your mother, and tell her there is serious doubt about you ever becoming an engineer.

 
Last edited:
What is your education, enigma?

Please, i would like to know.
Why? I didn't flunk out of engineering school but when my education is necessary for the topic then I will mention my education. In the meantime, I suggest you stick to the toic and stop derailing your thread.
 

Back
Top Bottom