Horizontal Ejections and Squibs

WildCat said:
Translation: "I can't believe you poopyheads trust only in physics, facts and evidence and ignore completely my uneducated speculative opinion involving a truck bomb on every floor".

Don't worry papasmurf, I hear PfffT is looking for new members! Maybe you should check out the mini-nuke theory one of their "FDR experts" is working on, it's right up your alley!
Click to expand...


You'll admit that his claim about the top part of the collapse losing mass as it successively adds floors was an inspiration. Not every conspiracy liar is capable of such creativity. Even the comical dunce Heiwa would argue that the collapse simply stops because...because...well, BECAUSE! He could never have made the conceptual leap to theorizing that the mass diminishes as it grows.
 
Ya know, those squibs look remarkably like the air venting out of a diving submaine's ballast tanks. Maybe the towers didn't collapse, but submerged?
 
WildCat said:
Sorry Greg, after the recent influx of "Truth Movement ca. 2005" here lately I mistook your meaning. :blush:


Oh, everyone can make smart aleck remarks... and they do.
Click to expand...

No problem Wildcat, I'm new to this playground and you guys have WAAAYYY more "different" people here than the other forums I've been spending time at.

I thought poker people were extreme but WOW!

Look for more posts and plenty of smart offs in the future.
 
papasmurf said:
The building that could take multiple 707 impacts turns to dust, yet we are supposed to believe this is completely understandable.

What is wrong with you people?
Click to expand...
Considering that the debris removed from ground zero was 3.2 billion pounds, that means your dust idea is entirely wrong. What is wrong with you people?
 
Please allow me to express my admiration for the forbearance shown here by the regulars trying to beat some high-school-level physics understanding into an apparently unreceptive truther noggin. I just can't fathom such willing obtuseness on their parts. Maybe they were ignored as children.....oh....wait a sec......:)
 
Drudgewire said:
Yes, the towers caught on fire and gravity took over. NOTHING ELSE happened to them that day which could possibly have weakened the structure. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

the experts in the demolition industry will not like to hear that - it would make them jobless. God thanks for them nobody takes seriously the explanations of NIST.
 
Last edited:
bio said:
the experts in the demolition industry will not like to hear that - it would make them jobless. God thanks for them nobody takes seriously the explanations of NIST.
Click to expand...
Another false/faulty statement. This faulty logic is indicative of your failure to understand 9/11 issues, like most true movement members.

You forgot the why, missed the fact the CD industry uses gravity as the major energy source to bring down the building, fail to realize explosives are used to guide the fall.

The major energy release in CD is due to gravity. It saves money.

The biggest energy source on 9/11; (estimates not exact, except the impacts are very close, fire is low, and collapse is close but may be low estimate)
FIRE, over 800 TONS of TNT = heat energy
Collapse, over 200 TONS of TNT = kinetic energy
Impacts, 1300 to 2093 pounds of TNT

In CD the explosive used are usually much less than the impacts on 9/11 alone. The WTC and many larger buildings would not be brought down with CD for various reasons, they are dismantled.
 
beachnut said:
Another false/faulty statement. This faulty logic is indicative of your failure to understand 9/11 issues, like most true movement members.

You forgot the why, missed the fact the CD industry uses gravity as the major energy source to bring down the building, fail to realize explosives are used to guide the fall.

The major energy release in CD is due to gravity. It saves money.

The biggest energy source on 9/11; (estimates not exact, except the impacts are very close, fire is low, and collapse is close but may be low estimate)
FIRE, over 800 TONS of TNT = heat energy
Collapse, over 200 TONS of TNT = kinetic energy
Impacts, 1300 to 2093 pounds of TNT

In CD the explosive used are usually much less than the impacts on 9/11 alone. The WTC and many larger buildings would not be brought down with CD for various reasons, they are dismantled.
Click to expand...

yes - let the upper section (1/5) fall down on the section below (4/5) and you need no TNT anymore. I comes down just by gravity.
 
watch Zero, the interview with the survivor from WTC, how they descibe the fires, wich was not an inferno, or the explosions they kept hearing all the time etc :)
 
Dictator Cheney said:
watch Zero, the interview with the survivor from WTC, how they descibe the fires, wich was not an inferno, or the explosions they kept hearing all the time etc :)
Click to expand...

You are a bare faced liar. Those fires were huge in those towers and also very very hot.

You really are scraping the barrel now in your attempt to claim tweeters ignoramus comedy crown.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom