Homosexuality is a choice

[IMST]

Wow. Sure got stupid in here since I last visited the thread. Nice to see another gay JREFer out there, though. Hey bikerdruid.

 

[Marcus]

This is the first time I've used an ignore function in any internet forum. But bishadi earned it fair and square.

Let me know if we ever have a best troll award . . .

I agree that any further reading of his posts is a waste of time. However, if he does reveal when he chose to become heterosexual, perhaps someone who does read his posts could give us the heads up.

 

[SezMe]

i am honest enough to represent my sexual orientation is based on the gender of my birth (biology) as it is easy to provide the evidence; by looking between my legs.

There you go again.

Bishadi, you ignored my #246. I'll pose it as a question: Do you think that external genitalia are the same thing as sexual orientation?

Bishadi, why are you ignoring this simple question?

It's a simple yes or no question, Bishadi. Why won't you answer it?

 

[Bishadi]

This is the first time I've used an ignore function in any internet forum. But bishadi earned it fair and square.

Let me know if we ever have a best troll award . . .

I will assume that be a psyche major. As a biology major don't need to be on this thread; they already know the truth of the matter

 

[Bishadi]

Bishadi, why are you ignoring this simple question?

That a gender is identified of a mammal by the genitals?

A kid can tell the difference on a dog, so why answer.

If you want to ask if the genital parts assist in making a determination as to what sexual orientation a life has by observing the genitals, then a no brained once again.

But some are not trying to understand. As they don't even comprehend the plus and negative signs of a battery let alone the Pauli

 

[katy_did]

Also, thanks for the sig material. It's truer than you realize.

- Scott

"these are the kind of moronic posts that twist up reality." -- Bishadi

So true. I had a bunch of things to say as I read through the thread, then I got to the end and found it had become...this...

 

[shandyjan]

deleted due to hashing up the edit

 

[shandyjan]

I went to Greta Christinas blog to see what she had to say on the matter as I know she commented on it long ago. She links to this, which is interesting in that it links to the studies here and there. It also shows there is no answer yet.
Of course the idea people are making choices to be gay has no science behind it at all.

http://pithingcontest.blogspot.com/2006/06/organic-behavior-no-fault-identities.html

ETA.. you can't change the opinion of someone so stuck in their ways, it is just giving them the chance to write their bigotted views for all to see.... and probably get off on it.

 

[BobTheDonkey]

I think you don't really get their point.

I know anecdote isn't data, but I guess it's better than nothing at all: I've managed to corner a couple of relatives into "ok, so why IS it selfish?" Turns out that they don't actually give a flying f-word about anything else than someone to pay their pensions. It doesn't help that some paid PR by insurance companies also plays on the same fears to get people to switch their pension plans to them.

You know, in case you were wondering why so many conservative types are all for making lots of babies, but basically only care about you until you get born, after that, screw you, you're not getting any welfare, medical insurance or anything from them... well, that may well be why. You're supposed to make those new people to pay for their retirement, not to actually get any benefits themselves.

And it's of course selfish to choose to not make more of those little piggy banks for them.

No, no. I completely understand where they're coming from. I just prefer to give most of them (my coworkers) the benefit of the doubt (and didn't want to offend the many parents posting here).

But we're definitely on the same page wrt the selfishness of having a child (or telling others to do so).

 

[SezMe]

That a gender is identified of a mammal by the genitals?

No, that's not the question I asked and you damn well know it.

If you want to ask if the genital parts assist in making a determination as to what sexual orientation a life has by observing the genitals, then a no brained once again.

No, that's not the question I asked and you damn well know it. Even if it was, you still didn't answer. I'll try again:

Do you think that external genitalia are the same thing as sexual orientation?

 

[Emet]

No, that's not the question I asked and you damn well know it.



No, that's not the question I asked and you damn well know it. Even if it was, you still didn't answer. I'll try again:

Do you think that external genitalia are the same thing as sexual orientation?

Have you been to the SMM&T subforum recently? Your question will not be answered--at least in any intelligible way...

Respectfully,
Emet

 

[Piggy]

Wow. Sure got stupid in here since I last visited the thread. Nice to see another gay JREFer out there, though. Hey bikerdruid.

Speaking of which, what happened to Complexity? Has he gone on another Lost Weekend?

 

[ThermionicScott]

And every child you perhaps even heard of or read about was born by the normal methods of sexual intercourse.

Apparently you've never heard of Louise Brown. She was kind of a big deal.

just as PERHAPS you didnt read the clip you grabbed

So you would say that Louise Brown was conceived and born through normal sexual intercourse?

any post that people claim that sexual orientation is divergent from the gender of the biological life is what i call the kind of moronic posts that twist up reality.

If it makes so much sense, surely you can rustle up some peer-reviewed research to convince us. I mean, such a divergence from reality ought to have all kinds of holes that smart people can illuminate, right?

although to be scientific i am open that hermaphradite (i r smaught and learning) is/are the exception(s)

You still spelled it wrong, but it's not like I had high expectations for you or anything.

- Scott

 

[Bishadi]

No, that's not the question I asked and you damn well know it.



No, that's not the question I asked and you damn well know it. Even if it was, you still didn't answer. I'll try again:

Do you think that external genitalia are the same thing as sexual orientation?

i could give of hoot what you want.

You are not interested in reality, you are a fool playing with fire and have no idea what the hell you are doing.

This is not a subject to play with people. There are lives and human beings who live and breath that are directly affected by the right and wrong of what this isssue is about.

I know dam well what the hell kind of monsters selfish people are, and i could care less what you think of me!

 

[Ron_Tomkins]

Originally Posted by Bishadi
i am honest enough to represent my sexual orientation is based on the gender of my birth (biology) as it is easy to provide the evidence; by looking between my legs.

Wait a minute.... dude, are you inviting me to look at your crotch? Whoa...

 

[Bishadi]

So you would say that Louise Brown was conceived and born through normal sexual intercourse?

You can witness what you feel but i didnt say anything of the sort.




But i will agree, this thread is kind of like the many others on homosexual choice; many of the folks who finally taste the truth of the matter just can't handle it.



the self centered mind is a tough one to even care about!

 

[Bishadi]

Wait a minute.... dude, are you inviting me to look at your crotch? Whoa...

does it turn you on?

 

[Mr. Scott]

Can we choose what makes us aroused?

sure....

you can look between your legs and say 'hey i was born this way'

or you can lie to yourself

straight and narrow are true and false

i didnt decide, i comprehended what the parts were for.

Some do some funny stuff with them parts and then try to call it love!

Weirdest thing you even could realize!

Bishadi, the list of questions I've asked that you've ignored is very long now, but I will add one anyway.

A typical experience for a young homosexual male is to discover their "parts" become engorged with blood, erect, and prepare for ejaculation when they see or think about a hot guy, (but never about a hot girl), accompanied by a huge oxytocin rush and its intense feelings of both love and sexual arousal. Is this a "choice?" Or, a discovered part of their nature that they have not chosen? If a choice, exactly how do young men choose this?

 

[ThermionicScott]

You can witness what you feel but i didnt say anything of the sort.

You said that every child was born of normal sexual intercourse. I offered a counterexample, which you clumsily tried to dodge. It's not about what I "witness" or "feel", you're just plain wrong.

- Scott

 

[Bishadi]

Bishadi, the list of questions I've asked that you've ignored is very long now, but I will add one anyway.

A typical experience for a young homosexual male is to discover their "parts" become engorged with blood, erect, and prepare for ejaculation when they see or think about a hot guy, (but never about a hot girl), accompanied by a huge oxytocin rush and its intense feelings of both love and sexual arousal. Is this a "choice?" Or, a discovered part of their nature that they have not chosen? If a choice, exactly how do young men choose this?

i dont do weird science!

now this part of what people can evidence is why the BS continues to pile up.