Homosexuality is a choice

you have no idea what life is

Hahaha that made me laugh out loud. I think I have a pretty good idea what life is.

I like this definition of "purpose": "an anticipated outcome that is intended or that guides your planned actions; "his intent was to provide a new translation"; "good intentions are not enough"; "it was created with the conscious aim of answering immediate needs"; "he made no secret of his designs"

I guess the purpose of a snowflake is to make a pretty six-sided sculpture. So smart these snowflakes!

We are molecular machines that just kept running better than other molecular machines that didn't keep running. "Purpose" emerged in advanced central nervous systems. Most living things have no central nervous system and therefore have no purpose, and most higher animals have no idea the "purpose" of sex is to make babies. It's to experience pleasure, and the pleasure system typically leads animals to do what makes similar creatures.
 
I don't understand, if it's a choice, what's the problem? Many opponents of homosexuality (and other sexual minorities) seem to treat that as a silver bullet. But..since proven to be harmless, it's a lot like claiming wearing "Green hats" is a choice, so it should be banned.
 
Where are you getting that life abuses entropy? Organisms are open systems.
every system within the universe is an open system (causally described).


Spend some quality time reading about the laws of thermodynamics. They say nothing about open systems.
the first law, renders conservation, the second claims }to equilibrate a potential difference'; if the first requires a conservation, then to equlibrate you must know how and why.

hot going to cold and no idea why, is stupid!

if life has an instinct to procreate, it seem the life dont wannna die

i have evidence, life, and adherants cant even define a simple flame of the bic lighter (abusing the law)

Where are you getting that masturbation scars people for life?
Is that question based on having a ADHD issue? I said, i was scarred by what i saw. Were you reading some fignewton of the immagination or is it just normal to post what you thought you read?

go to the zoo and watch the mandrels (in season).................. them boys are serious about their bidness and i have personally mentioned to mothers with kids, "you may not wish to have your kids see what they are doing on that side of the enclosure"

i have heard older women practically scream (closer to a loud gasp)

Got some studies somewhere to support that conclusion?

in this case of the mandrel, i dont think it is necessary

but if you personally need something to do with your life, then please go look into the catholic pedophilia issues, i will bet quite a few of the victims are scarred for life there.

i can be quoted as claiming that thru the lies of the irresponsibile are how the procreation of homosexual preferences, continues

i dont need a study!

I witness what i see, all by myself.

p/s... this is a conversation on homosexual 'choice'..... if you want to play and twist up words with me, you will not find my humor nice to misgivings.
 
Hahaha that made me laugh out loud. I think I have a pretty good idea what life is.

I like this definition of "purpose":
you forgot the 'd'


I guess the purpose of a snowflake is to make a pretty six-sided sculpture. So smart these snowflakes!
the energy combines upon the mass to create the fractal (snowflake). For that environment the greatest amount of energy for the structure.

It is a natural phenomenon. (see conche shell (or about any sea shell, life)
We are molecular machines that just kept running better than other molecular machines that didn't keep running. "Purpose" emerged in advanced central nervous systems.

to tap the surface of a flat pond the wave rolls over the mass. As if it knows what it is doing but we know better. ie.. the energy itself is 'in motion' and as some believe it is rolling down hill, them few do not comprehend, that proportionally, the amount of mass affected (the whole body of the pond) is increasing. (conservation)

Most living things have no central nervous system and therefore have no purpose,

funny, what is a cytoskeleton but the nervous system of the cell.

but i see you are losing this debate because of the context usage of the word and spelling or PURPOSED to continue.



and most higher animals have no idea the "purpose" of sex is to make babies.

That is what makes people so cool, we can comprehend reality.

instinct shares the 'purpose' of life all by itself.

and most all humans know that sex is how babies come.


It's to experience pleasure, and the pleasure system typically leads animals to do what makes similar creatures.

ducks and nuts, like to have thier head buried, even if it means death, just for the fun?
 
I don't understand, if it's a choice, what's the problem?
because many psychologist within the quack practice of lying to people have created precedence over the concept that sexual orientation is not a choice.

Anything of the physiological aspect of sex, is biological and the psychologist have created a whole branch of BS that many have come to believe.

sexual orientation is the gender a life is born with, not what they prefer!

run it on google, wiki, etc...... this whole issue would be dead, simply by shutting down the adverse imposition of irresponsible psychological acceptances.

Many opponents of homosexuality (and other sexual minorities) seem to treat that as a silver bullet. But..since proven to be harmless, it's a lot like claiming wearing "Green hats" is a choice, so it should be banned.

i am not an opponent of gay preferences.

i just believe a each person must be responsible for themselves.
 
because many psychologist within the quack practice of lying to people have created precedence over the concept that sexual orientation is not a choice.

What "quack"? Who are you talking about? A duck?

sexual orientation is the gender a life is born with, not what they prefer!

Ok, so you then agree homosexuality isn't a choice?


run it on google, wiki, etc...... this whole issue would be dead, simply by shutting down the adverse imposition of irresponsible psychological acceptances.

I'm sorry, what?

i just believe a each person must be responsible for themselves.

From that wording, it seems you give it a negative connotation, why?
 
Last edited:
What "quack"? Who are you talking about? A duck?
any liar is a duck to me, just quacking

Ok, so you then agree homosexuality isn't a choice?
if you are born with your parts (sexual orientation) and then choose to like the same sex; then you know already, that same sexual choices are the preferences.

the sexual orientation of a life is what they were born with (gender).

in the psychology field, they have redefined what 'sexual orientation' is in which they now have people believing their are gay by birth but not a one of them are diagnosed hemorphridite (born both sexes).

So my position is quite clear, if you are born gay, then genetically you will be hemorphridite otherwise it is BS; all cases.

anyone can love the same sex but there is no such thing as being born to have sex with the same sex; because that 'species' will go extinct.



I'm sorry, what?



From that wording, it seems you give it a negative connotation, why?

the whole arena within the legal system is ruined because of irresponsible psychologist.
 
any liar is a duck to me, just quacking

Uh...

if you are born with your parts (sexual orientation) and then choose to like the same sex; then you know already, that same sexual choices are the preferences.

Well then, back to my original question, so what? If it's a choice, what does it matter?

the sexual orientation of a life is what they were born with (gender).

No

in the psychology field, they have redefined what 'sexual orientation' is in which they now have people believing their are gay by birth but not a one of them are diagnosed hemorphridite (born both sexes).

So my position is quite clear, if you are born gay, then genetically you will be hemorphridite otherwise it is BS; all cases.

Never heard that argument before. How could it be "gay" if you are both sexes though? Isn't both ways then heterosexuality for you?

anyone can love the same sex but there is no such thing as being born to have sex with the same sex; because that 'species' will go extinct.

....


the whole arena within the legal system is ruined because of irresponsible psychologist.

Maybe you should see one.
 
Uh...



Well then, back to my original question, so what? If it's a choice, what does it matter?
it dont.

did you notice my first post, that observed the likening in which suicide is also a choice

and that claim can only be sustained by reading duck work


Never heard that argument before. How could it be "gay" if you are both sexes though? Isn't both ways then heterosexuality for you?

i have lots of arguments you may never have seen (heard) before.

my point is the sexual orientation of the life is what they are born with. If any human being wants to claim, they like same SEX and it is because they are born that way, then for that person to be honest, then they must be hemorphridite; all cases.

which means for example, there are more children born with a cleft palet (and 'we the people' can assist them), then children born gay



and the best way to ID the liar who claims they are gay by birth, is to perform biological test



now the honest ones like to have same sex and it is there choice.

i have no problem with honesty but i do have a problem with liars that adversely affect others because they feel they can or have the right.
 
Last edited:
it dont.

did you notice my first post, that observed the likening in which suicide is also a choice

and that claim can only be sustained by reading duck work




i have lots of arguments you may never have see (heard) before.

my point is the sexual orientation of the life is what they are born with. If any human being wants to claim, they like same SEX and it is because they are born that way, then for that person to be honest, then they must be hemorphridite; all cases.

which means for example, there are most children born with a cleft palet (and 'we the people' can assist them), then children born gay



and the best way to ID the liar who claims they are gay by birth, is to perform biological test



now the honest ones like to have same sex and it is there choice.

i have no problem with honesty but i do have a problem with liars that adversely affect others because they feel they can or have the right.

Uh yeah. Seek professional help dude.
 
Uh yeah. Seek professional help dude.


this is exactly what happens when reality sets in to people who can represent lies and care little of others.


Homosexuality is a choice, and to comprehend what that means literally, is what breaks the back of any gay beliefs.
 
So my position is quite clear, if you are born gay, then genetically you will be hemorphridite otherwise it is BS; all cases.

You used a semicolon ( ; ) above, which is generally used where you have two clauses that stand up as sentences in their own right and where a standard conjunction such as and or but might be used. By replacing the conjunction with the semicolon a less formal tone can be realised.

The colon ( : ) I think would be better in your sentence above, it helps to explain or reiterate in more detail what has gone before. But your first comma cries out even more so for the colon and as anyone who has two colons will know, more than one is a bit counter-productive, so better replace the semicolon with a dash ( - ), and all will be well.
 
Last edited:
You used a semicolon ( ; ) above, which is generally used where you have two clauses that stand up as sentences in their own right and where a standard conjunction such as and or but might be used. By replacing the conjunction with the semicolon a less formal tone can be realised.

The colon ( : ) I think would be better in your sentence above, it helps to explain or reiterate in more detail what has gone before. But your first comma cries out even more so for the colon and as anyone who has two colons will know, more than one is a bit counter-productive, so better replace the semicolon with a dash ( - ), and all will be well.

hey perhaps that should be in the gay psychology course; using colons for the wrong thing will do nothing for life.


thanks for the contribution to the thread!
 
same studies used by christine o'donnell.:rolleyes:
she's an 'anti-wanker' too, i believe.

if you study with the same level of your reading comprehension, then no wonder you are confused

i dont know if COD has been to the zoo and observed the frustrated mandrill

but ask most any teen, sexual frustration can cause lots of self inflicted actions.
 
if you study with the same level of your reading comprehension, then no wonder you are confused

i dont know if COD has been to the zoo and observed the frustrated mandrill

but ask most any teen, sexual frustration can cause lots of self inflicted actions.

You're funny.

Have you considered stand up comedy?
 
hey perhaps that should be in the gay psychology course; using colons for the wrong thing will do nothing for life.

Here I should say that underlining might be confusing for those new to the web: when a hyperlink is expected and cannot be clicked upon, only frustration can ensue. Bold text is fine, but even better: italics.
 

Back
Top Bottom