• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

hominids

No, Freeman's crappy videos and what's obviously a man in a suit to, I'm guessing, 90% of the people who see it ain't enough.

Try reading my post again, and get back to me when you get a real pic, or vid...maybe something like:

[qimg]http://www.inheatscents.net/images/cybersniper0009.jpg[/qimg]
www.inheatscents.net

or

[qimg]http://my-photo-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/Spirit-bear.jpg[/qimg]
wildnatureimages.com

Not like

[qimg]http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/gallery/albums/userpics/26762/Memorial_crop.jpg[/qimg]
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com

or

[qimg]http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/gallery/albums/userpics/26762/Freeman_crop.jpg[/qimg]
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com

You know, normal quality pics that people take when they aren't trying to BS others about creatures that don't exist.

Ones a racoon, which are EVERYWHERE, and the other one is 1 freaking photo. Why not give me thousands.

Im a little tired of you claiming it doesnt exist. Why dont you demonstrate it cant by covering every square inch of the pnw and canada, and then you can come back to me and tell me its not there. Why would their be 30 pages on an animal that doesnt exist, at the JREF.

Source for the freeman suit, and patty suit.
 
Im a little tired of you claiming it doesnt exist. Why dont you demonstrate it cant by covering every square inch of the pnw and canada, and then you can come back to me and tell me its not there.

I realize you're young and quite uneducated about all things bigfoot, but surely you've heard of Krantz? Read Krantz. He has some occasional nuggets of science mixed in with his wishful-thinking. Like this one:

"The skeptics are under no obligation to disprove all or, for that matter, any of the evidence. The burden of proof rests with those who think that the animals are real." -- Dr. Grover Krantz, Big Footprints, page 7

RayG
 
Ones a racoon, which are EVERYWHERE, and the other one is 1 freaking photo. Why not give me thousands.

Why, so you can then say give me hundreds of thousands, followed by millions, etc, etc?Why don't you give me one pic of bigfoot equal to the quality of either of those pics? Just one. I don't need thousands.

By the way, here's your thousands.

Lame excuse coming in 5...4...3....

Im a little tired of you claiming it doesnt exist.

Tough. Give me one good pic and I'll change my tune.

Why dont you demonstrate it cant by covering every square inch of the pnw and canada, and then you can come back to me and tell me its not there.

For the same reason I'm not covering every inch of the North Pole to prove to you that Santa Claus doesn't exist.

Why would their be 30 pages on an animal that doesnt exist, at the JREF.

Ummm, because it's a skeptics forum dedicated to, among other things, discussing non-existent things believed to exist by some. Like bigfoot, aliens, esp, etc.

Source for the freeman suit, and patty suit.

Couldn't tell you. Don't know the source of any costume I see, so I guess that means they might be real creatures. Better question: Where's bigfoot? Thousands of them worldwide allegedly, so it should be pretty easy to find just one. A heck of a lot easier than trying to find the manufacturers label on 2 suits that could be anywhere, if they still exist at all.
 
You mean those bear pics at ZOO'S?

I seriously want to know if you have ADD.

Dead bear not in zoo, just posted:



Tibetan Blue Bear not in zoo:



2 squatch videos, and that aint enough? Remember neither have been proven to be false.

Since Freeman is an admitted hoaxer and his video could easily be a hoax, I guess you would lend a car thief your car if you had one. Also remember, there are many UFO videos that haven't been shown false. Much more than two.
 
Ones a racoon, which are EVERYWHERE, and the other one is 1 freaking photo. Why not give me thousands.

I fell down. If anyone could mistake a bear for Bigfoot, it would most surely be you.

Im a little tired of you claiming it doesnt exist. Why dont you demonstrate it cant by covering every square inch of the pnw and canada, and then you can come back to me and tell me its not there.

You'll do the same for UFO's, right?

Why would their be 30 pages on an animal that doesnt exist, at the JREF.

Because of woo woo footers like you.

Source for the freeman suit, and patty suit.

I chocolate Wednesday finger manager it kiwi.

Here is reliable evidence that makaya is a troll. Makaya is posting at BFF under the handle "blue bear" where he is aping myself and other skeptics and pretending to the Bigfoot enthusiasts to be a skeptic using the same blurb-fart spam troll chat brat style he uses here:

blue bear (makaya325) @ BFF said:
Ahh, a typical enthusiast post. I never said i dismissed anyone's encounter, but i suggest they probably mistaken a good padded suit or bear for the squatch, sorry.

10000'S? come on! Most of those are ambigious whoops and "being watched", which can be anything. Very few are up close, and until we have better proof, bf is not considered a plausible critter

http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=24870&view=findpost&p=515804

Makaya is one of the most hilarious Bigfoot enthusiasts I've seen role through here. Has anyone pointed out to the members there that he's messing with them?
 
Last edited:
Makaya is one of the most hilarious Bigfoot enthusiasts I've seen role through here. Has anyone pointed out to the members there that he's messing with them?

Hmmm.....it is rumored in BFF underground that there could be a slight possibility that someone may have told a few members.
 
Blue bears in the wild. One ain't living.

d144ce1e.jpg
e8fff231.jpg
 
Blue bears in the wild. One ain't living.

[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/d144ce1e.jpg[/qimg] [qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/e8fff231.jpg[/qimg]

WP, that's not a Tibetan blue bear. It comes up when googling Tibetan blue bear but it is a mistake. That is an Asiatic black bear, known also as the Himalayan black bear (Ursus thibetanus). I found the same type of images when I found the blue bear images that I posted.
 
I fell down. If anyone could mistake a bear for Bigfoot, it would most surely be you.



You'll do the same for UFO's, right?



Because of woo woo footers like you.



I chocolate Wednesday finger manager it kiwi.

Here is reliable evidence that makaya is a troll. Makaya is posting at BFF under the handle "blue bear" where he is aping myself and other skeptics and pretending to the Bigfoot enthusiasts to be a skeptic using the same blurb-fart spam troll chat brat style he uses here:



http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=24870&view=findpost&p=515804

Makaya is one of the most hilarious Bigfoot enthusiasts I've seen role through here. Has anyone pointed out to the members there that he's messing with them?


Those woo's at bff cant answer my ecological impact arguement i proposed. There has to be an answer. They are close minded to it not existing, which is a very real possibility
 
WP, that's not a Tibetan blue bear. It comes up when googling Tibetan blue bear but it is a mistake. That is an Asiatic black bear, known also as the Himalayan black bear (Ursus thibetanus). I found the same type of images when I found the blue bear images that I posted.


Crap it's wrong. Never trust the internet. Well it has some merit. It looks like it's wearing a crummy suit. See... live animals can have folds, subducts and shoulder donuts.
 
d144ce1e.jpg


I think it's neat that both the Himalayan black bear and the Tibetan blue bear (which is a brown bear and thus more closely related to the grizzly) have similar light patches on their chests.
 
Those woo's at bff cant answer my ecological impact arguement i proposed. There has to be an answer. They are close minded to it not existing, which is a very real possibility

You didn't say anything about the many undebunked UFO videos. You are a liar, a poseur, an artless dodger, and a troll. Your last sentence is lip service. You demonstrate no openess to Bigfoot not being real as demonstarted by your comment that you will stop believing if we comb every inch of the continent. Both skeptics and Bigfoot enthusiasts think you are a troll and you lie to both. How does it feel to be reviled across the boards? Ready for a turnaround?
 
Yep.:D. You are looking at one of the most amazing REAL creatures on this planet.

Which you said we had no images of and could not study. I gave you a slew of images and you did not retract and apologize. Why didn't you do that? That is typical troll behaviour.
 
You didn't say anything about the many undebunked UFO videos. You are a liar, a poseur, an artless dodger, and a troll. Your last sentence is lip service. You demonstrate no openess to Bigfoot not being real as demonstarted by your comment that you will stop believing if we comb every inch of the continent. Both skeptics and Bigfoot enthusiasts think you are a troll and you lie to both. How does it feel to be reviled across the boards? Ready for a turnaround?

There are no undebunked videos of UFO'S. Why would a debunker like you actually say that?

Yep, that isnt so hard to ask... start combing. I think that debunkers dont want it done is to prove they are wrong, or the believers are afraid of it not revealing anything. Both sides need to wake up and approach this situation outdoors, not in their cubicles.

uff...That 10 mile hike today revealed nothing but a racoon. :mad:
 

Back
Top Bottom