• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

hominids

xblade said:
Does this mean only humans with 18 inch feet can fake 18 inch tracks? :D
Click to expand...

makaya325 said:
No, but whoever is doing it is of monstrous proportions
Click to expand...


Maaaaate . . .

Have you seen Jurassic Park? Do you remember seeing the T. Rex tracks? Unless they were real, Universal Studios must have a special effects dude that weighs over four tons.

Or your argument may be faulty.
 
Akhenaten said:
Maaaaate . . .

Have you seen Jurassic Park? Do you remember seeing the T. Rex tracks? Unless they were real, Universal Studios must have a special effects dude that weighs over four tons.

Or your argument may be faulty.
Click to expand...

Movies can edit things, unlike in real life. To fake a track, A very very large man would have to strap on feet in wet soil.
 
makaya325 said:
Movies can edit things, unlike in real life. To fake a track, A very very large man would have to strap on feet in wet soil.
Click to expand...

Why would it have to be a very very large man? In order to create a long gate one can jump from spot to spot. This jumping would also cause you to sink further into the soil giving the impression (pun intended) of very very large creature.

All of that aside the main evidence from prints is the casts. One does not need to supply a trail of bigfoot feet only a plaster cast and a photo with some sort of size comparison. The print its self becomes largely irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
LTC8K6 said:
How would you fake a bigfoot track?

And where is the evidence that any track was made by anything heavier than a human being?
Click to expand...

Squatch tracks have been found to have a depth unlike a human, and more like a grizzly. So its reasonable whatever left the tracks was a giant man or something else?
 
makaya325 said:
Squatch tracks have been found to have a depth unlike a human, and more like a grizzly. So its reasonable whatever left the tracks was a giant man or something else?
Click to expand...

Makaya, you said "what about tracks that arent bear, and too deep for humans, unless they are 500 plus lbs humans?"

I asked for evidence of that. Post #402 wasn't it. Where are these tracks that can only be made by 500+ lbs humans or Bigfoot?
 
makaya325 said:
Yes. Do you realize that carrying 30 pounds on each foot walking is hard? Try doing it up and down hills, through dense brush and vegetation
Click to expand...
Do you realize that he did it. For no other reason than to have a bit of fun and a chuckle at people looking for a giant penguin. But no, I guess its silly to think anyone might do the same to a bigfoot enthusiast.
 
Hitch said:
Do you realize that he did it. For no other reason than to have a bit of fun and a chuckle at people looking for a giant penguin. But no, I guess its silly to think anyone might do the same to a bigfoot enthusiast.
Click to expand...


Nope, not at all. Maybe on a beach, but not in rugged areas where a 200 pound person wouldnt leave a dent on the ground
 
makaya325 said:
Yes. Do you realize that carrying 30 pounds on each foot walking is hard? Try doing it up and down hills, through dense brush and vegetation
Click to expand...


Makaya, you said that you are 18 years old. You talked about presently working in a lab with microscopes. Are you still in high school, or taking college classes now? Are you focusing on a science-based education and career?

You don't have to answer those questions as they are personal.
 
William Parcher said:
Makaya, you said that you are 18 years old. You talked about presently working in a lab with microscopes. Are you still in high school, or taking college classes now? Are you focusing on a science-based education and career?

You don't have to answer those questions as they are personal.
Click to expand...


Yes, that is correct. I dont work in labs. My microscope has been upgraded many times.

My focus is to be a wildlife biologist or ecologist
 
LTC8K6 said:
There is no evidence that bigfoot, assuming it exists, is any heavier than a human.
Click to expand...

Assuming it exists its proported mass and proportions ,which in nearly all cases exceeds that of humans does not somehow give weight to go along with those proportions? If its big its heavy.
 
makaya325 said:
Yes, that is correct. I dont work in labs. My microscope has been upgraded many times.
Click to expand...

What is correct, high school or college?

My focus is to be a wildlife biologist or ecologist
Click to expand...

Then why oh why would you allow yourself to think that the entire remains of a creature are needed to know its mode of locomotion or that without DNA one can not determine the taxonomic relationship of an animal? How does this happen? Does the concept of fossils and and the most fundamental basics of zoology and paleontology elude you?
 
Assuming it exists its proported mass and proportions ,which in nearly all cases exceeds that of humans does not somehow give weight to go along with those proportions? If its big its heavy.
Click to expand...

When you have evidence, and not anecdotes, about size and weight, I'll be glad to listen. Until then, assuming allows us to say anything we wish.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom