• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

hominids

makaya325 said:
http://home.clara.net/rfthomas/papers/images/binder2.jpg

http://wriversasquatchassoc.net/Pictures/ByrneCast.jpg

http://wriversasquatchassoc.net/index15 comparisons.html

http://www.sasquatchresearch.net/images/trax.jp

http://www.cryptomundo.com/wp-content/Mvc194web.jpg

http://pages.prodigy.net/ghostfish/_uimages/bigfoot3.jpg

http://www.spiritone.com/~brucem/bigfsec2.htm
Click to expand...
4th link doesn't work. Last link shows only what are clearly listed as bear tracks. No link provides any evidence of being too deep for humans.

Try again.

You said "what about tracks that arent bear, and too deep for humans, unless they are 500 plus lbs humans?"
 
And if you follow these Bigfooty lookin tracks you run into this Bugger

 
Last edited:
And look for crude looking "runways" around Bigflop's tracks (the ones that ain't Bear).



And to add the picture in the above post is a Kodiak a subspecies
of the Brown Bear.
 
Last edited:
JcR said:
Rear Grizzly Print.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_283964976bac064bbe.jpg[/qimg]

Looks all sasquatchy doesn't it.
Click to expand...

makaya325 said:
Jc, sorry but no, they dont even look alike at all.
Click to expand...

How many times do you need to be told to use the quote function to get the message? Why do we have to be scrolling up and down trying to figure out what you're talking about? It must be intentional. Not even serial laziness explains it. It takes no more effort to quote that to post without a quote.

And JcR's image doesn't look squatchy at all? Explain that.
 
kitakaze said:
How many times do you need to be told to use the quote function to get the message? Why do we have to be scrolling up and down trying to figure out what you're talking about? It must be intentional. Not even serial laziness explains it. It takes no more effort to quote that to post without a quote.

And JcR's image doesn't look squatchy at all? Explain that.
Click to expand...



http://www.bigfootencounters.com/images/wassontracks.jpg
 
makaya325 said:
Check this out

http://209.85.50.7/~skookum/images/articles/SasquatchFootprintEvaluation.pdf
Click to expand...

Why? It has even less to do with supporting your last claim. JcR's photo can easily be mistaken by Bigfoot enthusiasts as a Bigfoot print. You said it doesn't look like one at all. The link you gave only confirmed what I said. Instead of providing your own reasoning or a demonstration you give me a non sequitur spam-clam dribble squirt.


Makaya, I'm going to give you a litte free Japanese lesson. I'm going to teach you the phrase "kankei nai". Kankei nai means "unrelated." So when I say "sore wa zen zen kankei nai" it means "that has absolutely nothing to do with it." OK? So when you give me some non sequitur spam-clam dribble squirts, I will tell you kankei nai.

In fact, I will give you a catchy little song just to help you remember kankei nai:

 
Last edited:
kitakaze said:
Why? It has even less to do with supporting your last claim. JcR's photo can easily be mistaken by Bigfoot enthusiasts as a Bigfoot print. You said it doesn't look like one at all. The link you gave only confirmed what I said. Instead of providing your own reasoning or a demonstration you give me a non sequitur spam-clam dribble squirt.


Makaya, I'm going to give you a litte free Japanese lesson. I'm going to teach you the phrase "kankei nai". Kankei nai means "unrelated." So when I say "sore wa zen zen kankei nai" it means "that has absolutely nothing to do with it." OK? So when you give me some non sequitur spam-clam dribble squirts, I will tell you kankei nai.

In fact, I will give you a catchy little song just to help you remember kankei nai:

Click to expand...

Kitz, so your saying ALL are bears or hoaxes? Why no other alternative?
 
makaya325 said:
Kitz, so your saying ALL are bears or hoaxes? Why no other alternative?
Click to expand...

Guess what? Your response - uh-huh... kankei nai.

One footprint photo, you said it didn't look squatchy at all, it clearly does. Easily it could be mistaken by eager footers for Bigfoot. I've asked you repeatedly to demonstrate and explain how the print in no way resembles a Bigfoot print. I now have three non sequitur replies. Your last two questions in response had absolutely nothing to do with issue. Please don't reply with any sort of unrelated "so your saying..." posts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom