• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

hominids

Bruto, wouldnt eating that kill you? Im just pulling this one out: If africans eat gorillas, why is it unreasonable for natives to be eating bigfoot?
 
makaya325 said:
even though i admit bf has a possibility, i can see why areas like the himalayas and tibet could hold both the yeren and yeti.

a good suggestion:

I would be one of those in the camp that says that remains will be virtually impossible to find and no conclusion should be drawn from that.

Chimpanzees have lived in Africa for 7 million years and it is estimated that there are approximately 1 million living there at least up until that past several decades. If the averge chimp lives 40 years then that means 175 billion chimps have romped around the Africa continent.

The first fossilized chimp remains weren't discovered until 2004.

So, the complete lack of BF bones and remains is utterly meaningless to me.

interesting note above, its not like anyones going out looking for bf, unless u count the woos of the bfro
Click to expand...

Mayaka, I'm a big paleoanthropology nut. I'm very interested in human ancestry as well as hominid evolution. I can't quite figure though how you arrived at your figure there with 175 billion chimps. That's a lot of chimps! How did you arrive at that number?
 
I seriously doubt that you will cause yourself to be logically and righteously defined as a woo. There remains the possibility that your own behavior would be properly defined as troll.
Click to expand...

In a cuh-razy coincidence, someone with the same name and preoccupation with bear carcasses was suspended from unexplained-mysteries recently. If you want to see a 41 page thread on it (with bear carcass images, even!) try here.

Really good research in the first post.
 
Bander, thanks for bringing that up.

Yes, i admit, i got heated over there because of only one guy. I got along with skeptics there, but I couldnt stand this one and me and him kind of duked it out
 
Bandersnatch said:
In a cuh-razy coincidence, someone with the same name and preoccupation with bear carcasses was suspended from unexplained-mysteries recently. If you want to see a 41 page thread on it (with bear carcass images, even!) try here.

Really good research in the first post.
Click to expand...

If they lifted my dead bear images from here, I'm going to get shpilkes in my geneckteckessoink.
 
It was over on the bff. Before you say "thats bs" think about it, we know chimps live around that long and the number seems reasonable

Yes bander, my favorite animal is the bear
 
I understand that, but many of the questions you asked there seem to be of the same viraty you're asking here, did you feel your questions weren't fully answered?
 
No, Bander, they werent. One of the debunkers called my tribe "definitely mistaken in their stories", which is ok when you can provide evidence, but he failed to. He also said the pgf was a hoax because bigfoot doesnt exist. Look, i can understand if you claim its a hoax, but dont base it on bigfoot in general, base it on the film itself.
 
Kita, I would find it cool if a member of the jref and a member of the bff duke it out..debate style that is:cool:
 
Kitz, can you please stop with the factoids and labeling things you dont believe footerisms? I would get mad if they mislabeled something on the jref they didnt understand. You agree that its disrespectful when true-believers called some skeptics "skeptoids""?
 
makaya325 said:
Kita, I would find it cool if a member of the jref and a member of the bff duke it out..debate style that is:cool:
Click to expand...

It happens all the time. There's a number of BFF people who've come over here and tried to duke it out. It usually ends with the BFF person walking out in huff after throwing some insults around or going quiet after repeated requests for the evidence of their claims they know they do not have.

The better ones will try to keep their facts straight when they come here to Thunderdome because they know they'll get chewed up like kibblez n' bitz if they don't. What they don't do is something like this:

wiiawiwb @ BFF said:
Chimpanzees have lived in Africa for 7 million years and it is estimated that there are approximately 1 million living there at least up until that past several decades. If the averge chimp lives 40 years then that means 175 billion chimps have romped around the Africa continent.

The first fossilized chimp remains weren't discovered until 2004.

So, the complete lack of BF bones and remains is utterly meaningless to me.
Click to expand...


mayaka325 @ JREF said:
even though i admit bf has a possibility, i can see why areas like the himalayas and tibet could hold both the yeren and yeti.

a good suggestion:

I would be one of those in the camp that says that remains will be virtually impossible to find and no conclusion should be drawn from that.

Chimpanzees have lived in Africa for 7 million years and it is estimated that there are approximately 1 million living there at least up until that past several decades. If the averge chimp lives 40 years then that means 175 billion chimps have romped around the Africa continent.

The first fossilized chimp remains weren't discovered until 2004.

So, the complete lack of BF bones and remains is utterly meaningless to me.

interesting note above, its not like anyones going out looking for bf, unless u count the woos of the bfro
Click to expand...

They usually know if they try cut and paste someone else's argument as their own they will end up looking like a hack and look silly in front of the big boys.

That's Thunderdome, though.
 
makaya325 said:
Bruto, wouldnt eating that kill you? Im just pulling this one out: If africans eat gorillas, why is it unreasonable for natives to be eating bigfoot?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure I get your point. My point is that we're probably not seeing as many gorilla bodies as there are gorillas dying, because they're being hunted and eaten and those doing the illegal hunting are not presenting the bodies to investigators for obvious reasons. On the other hand there's plenty of physical evidence both of the gorillas and the hunting, so maybe my point wasn't a very good one either. Come to think of it, it probably is the reverse of my original point, because a little research suggests that gorilla remains are, in fact, pretty easy to come by.

You can find out more about the hunting of gorillas and chimpanzees by googling for "bushmeat." It's a serious conservation issue.

I'm not sure how that relates to the question of natives eating bigfoot, except that given mankind's propensity for hunting, killing and eating just about anything else that moves, we must wonder why there is so little evidence of bigfoot hunting, no bigfoot bones in middens, no bigfoot parts on necklaces, no bigfoot fur robes, and so forth. You can come up with any number of surmises why that is not the case, but of course the easiest if not the most interesting is the possibility that there never have been any bigfeet available to hunt because they don't. alas, exist.
 
I wasnt looking for a fight, Kit, I just copied and pasted it to let you know. I have no idea if its true, i just thought that you should read it.
 
Bruto, do you see any bear teeth on necklaces? Why would someone put a part of something that is human shaped? I would assume that they would mistake it for a man. Some indian reservations are off limits to most people, so who knows what others never share. Im sure if you ask one of us we will gladly show you the path
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom