• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

hominids

makaya325 said:
Kitz, when i asked you the valid question "tell me why it cant be created by a bf" after you posted "explain how it cant be a hoax"

For pete sakes, The moon landings were not IMPOSSIBLE to fake (I believe we did land on the moon) but why is it accepted as 100% proof, which scientists say no one could possibly fake the moon landings.
Click to expand...

kankei nai

Still waiting for these:

"what about tracks that arent bear, and too deep for humans, unless they are 500 plus lbs humans?"
 
makaya325 said:
That those above have voiced an opinion on the sasquatch mystery, and also that your a 100% skeptic who thinks sasquatch cant possibly exist
Click to expand...

Well, I for one would like to know exactly where they are hiding. They're kinda like homeopathy and other such nonsense. They seem to vanish specifically when looked for.

I'm amazed people are still discussing bigfoot after all this wasted time hunting for hot air.
 
makaya325 said:
person #- lived in virginia, hunted for over 20 years, and has never found a dead cougar or bear, very few deer, which are incredibly common to see, yet not exactly easy to find.

shall i go on?
Click to expand...

Well, you could start by telling us about those PNW hunters who have shared their bigfoot experiences with you. No one asked you to tell us about hunters who told you they haven't seen a dead bear. Not seeing a dead bear isn't evidence bigfoot exists in any way.
 
Hitch said:
Why don't we have one dead bigfoot photo?
Click to expand...

Who needs photos of dead bigfeet when we have photos of living bigfeet?

large_edited_1.jpg


http://www.fstrailcamcontest.com/Photos/Show/6f5e8730-452e-415a-9891-5c5544215d9b/
 
Belz... said:
Well, I for one would like to know exactly where they are hiding. They're kinda like homeopathy and other such nonsense. They seem to vanish specifically when looked for.

I'm amazed people are still discussing bigfoot after all this wasted time hunting for hot air.
Click to expand...

Looked? Your joking? No serious expeditions have been created to look. Sure, wildlife surveying is done, but generally in small areas.

It has more to do with debunkers not looking than bf being intelligent. For every deer found dead, tell me, how many arent?

Only 2 bear picks? How many years were they seperated?
 
makaya325 said:
Looked? Your joking? No serious expeditions have been created to look. Sure, wildlife surveying is done, but generally in small areas.

It has more to do with debunkers not looking than bf being intelligent. For every deer found dead, tell me, how many arent?

Only 2 bear picks? How many years were they seperated?
Click to expand...

For every BF sighting, video, howling, pig toss, orgy, footprint, how many have been found? Dead or alive? Hairs? Poop? Tooth? Skeleton?
 
For every BF sighting, video, howling, pig toss, orgy, footprint, how many have been found? Dead or alive? Hairs? Poop? Tooth? Skeleton?
Click to expand...

I think they found a tooth in a pile of hair-covered poop once. They knew it was bigfoot because it was surrounded by elk tracks.
 
makaya325 said:
Looked? Your joking? No serious expeditions have been created to look. Sure, wildlife surveying is done, but generally in small areas.

It has more to do with debunkers not looking than bf being intelligent. For every deer found dead, tell me, how many arent?

Only 2 bear picks? How many years were they seperated?
Click to expand...

Please define "wildlife survey" as used in your statement.
Please define "small areas" as used in your statement.
Now, please cite your sources that back up your statement.
Unless you do so - I will continue to post TROLL in response to your evermore ridiculous posts.
 
makaya325 said:
Looked? Your joking? No serious expeditions have been created to look. Sure, wildlife surveying is done, but generally in small areas.
Click to expand...

What would you class as a serious expedition then?
how long does it have to last?
how many people does it need to include and how much ground does it need to cover?

Does every square inch of North and South* America that currently is not densely populated have to be searched?

IF that turns up nothing do we need to start searching the sewers because he's visiting his cousin the Albino Crocodile of New York to escape the prying eyes?

At what point will Bigfoot believers finally admit that it's not real? oh wait if no one finds anything he's just extinct and not fossilised (maybe he's just pining for the fjords).

*Just in case Bigfoot happens to be migratory and wants to visit Cancun for the winter.
 
Archangel said:
At what point will Bigfoot believers finally admit that it's not real? oh wait if no one finds anything he's just extinct and not fossilised (maybe he's just pining for the fjords).
Click to expand...

makaya325 is too young to remember the original Monty Python skits, like this modified Cheese Shop sketch:

Bigfoot Evidence by makaya325

(Skeptic walks in the door)

Skeptic: Good Morning.

makaya325: Good morning, Sir.

Skeptic: Ah, thank you, my good man.

makaya325: What can I do for you, Sir?

Skeptic: I want to see some bigfoot evidence.

makaya325: (lustily) Certainly, sir. What would you like?

Skeptic: Well, eh, how about a few footprints?

makaya325: I'm, afraid I'm fresh out of footprints, sir.

Skeptic: Oh, never mind, how are you on photos?

makaya325: I'm afraid I never have those at the end of the week, sir, I'll get some fresh on Monday.

Skeptic: Tish tish. No matter. Well, four ounces of bigfoot blood, if you please.

makaya325: Ah! It's beeeen on order, sir, for two weeks. Was expecting it this morning.

Skeptic: 'T's Not my lucky day, is it? Aah, vocalizations?

makaya325: Sorry, sir.

Skeptic: Hairs?

makaya325: Normally, sir, yes. Today I've misplaced them.

Skeptic: Ah. Reliable witness reports?

makaya325: Sorry.

Skeptic: Fingerprints?

makaya325: (pause) No.

Skeptic: Scat, perhaps?

makaya325: Ah! I have scat, yessir.

Skeptic: (suprised) You do! Excellent.

makaya325: Yessir. It's..ah,.....it's a bit runny...

Skeptic: Oh, I like it runny.

makaya325: Well,.. It's very runny, actually, sir.

Skeptic: No matter. Fetch hither the sewage de la Grande Sasquatch! Mmmwah!

makaya325: I...think it's a bit runnier than you'll like it, sir.

Skeptic: I don't care how f***ing runny it is. Hand it over with all speed.

makaya325: Oooooooooohhh........! (pause)

Skeptic: What now?

makaya325: The cat's eaten it.

Skeptic: (pause) Has he.

makaya325: She, sir.

Skeptic: You...do *have* some evidence, don't you?

makaya325: (brightly) Of course, sir. I've got--

Skeptic: No no... don't tell me. I'm keen to guess.

makaya325: Fair enough.

Skeptic: Bigfoot nests?

makaya325: Not *today*, sir, no.

Skeptic: Links to factual information or reliable evidence?

makaya325: I've never considered links necessary sir.

Skeptic: (pause) Aah, how about some DNA results?

makaya325: Well, I don't get much call for that around here, sir.

Skeptic: Not much ca-- it's the single most supportive evidence in the world!

makaya325: Not 'round here, sir.

Skeptic: (slight pause) and what IS the most supportive evidence 'round hyah?

makaya325: No dead cougar or bear bones, sir.

Skeptic: I see.

Owner: Oh, yes, it's very rare for a hunter to find any cougar or bear bones.

Skeptic: I see. Uuh...the lack of cougar and bear bones, eh?

makaya325: Right, sir.

Skeptic: All right. Okay. 'Have you got any bigfoot bones?' he asked, expecting the answer 'no'.

makaya325: I'll have a look, sir........nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnno.

Skeptic: You're not much of a bigfoot researcher, are you?

makaya325: Finest in the district!

Skeptic: (annoyed) Explain the logic underlying that conclusion, please.

makaya325: Well, I have a microscope, sir!

Skeptic: It's certainly uncontaminated by evidence....

makaya325: (brightly) You haven't asked me about definitive proof, sir.

Skeptic: Would it be worth it?

makaya325: Could be....

Skeptic: (slowly) Have you got any definitive proof?

makaya325: No.

Skeptic: Figures. Predictable, really I suppose. It was an act of purest optimism to have posed the question in the first place. Tell me:

makaya325: Yessir?

Skeptic: (deliberately) Have you in fact got any evidence here at all?

makaya325: Yes, sir.

Skeptic: Really?

(pause)

makaya325: No. Not really, sir.

Skeptic: You haven't.

makaya325: Nosir. Not a scrap. I was deliberately wasting your time, sir.

Skeptic: Of that I have no doubt.

:D

RayG
 
Archangel said:
What would you class as a serious expedition then?
how long does it have to last?
how many people does it need to include and how much ground does it need to cover?

Does every square inch of North and South* America that currently is not densely populated have to be searched?

IF that turns up nothing do we need to start searching the sewers because he's visiting his cousin the Albino Crocodile of New York to escape the prying eyes?

At what point will Bigfoot believers finally admit that it's not real? oh wait if no one finds anything he's just extinct and not fossilised (maybe he's just pining for the fjords).

*Just in case Bigfoot happens to be migratory and wants to visit Cancun for the winter.
Click to expand...

I will be convinced if 100's of biologists look for it day in and out for years, covering every inch of Na, and if they dont find it, then i will accept it doesnt exist
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom