Holocaust deniers, explain this.

[kageki]

Explanation has been provided.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Explanation has been provided.

So, when will "GOOD explanation has been provided" come along?

 

[Chaos]

Explanation has been provided.

Steaming pile of Nazi apologist BS has been provided. We´re still waiting for the first fact to enter your posts.

 

[kageki]

Steaming pile of Nazi apologist BS has been provided. We´re still waiting for the first fact to enter your posts.

All that was requested was an explanation.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

All that was requested was an explanation.

"Reasonable, accurate, and rational" was implied. Note that for future use.

 

[kageki]

"Reasonable, accurate, and rational" was implied. Note that for future use.

I believe it was.

The pictures alone don't prove intent period. The only thing indicating intent were the captions which aren't necessarily facts.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

I believe it was.

The pictures alone don't prove intent period. The only thing indicating intent were the captions which aren't necessarily facts.

So, you didn't read any of the little words on the page. Not surprising, too much effort and it might damage your paradigm, and that can't be allowed now can it?

 

[dafydd]

All that was requested was an explanation.

Coward.

 

[dafydd]

So, you didn't read any of the little words on the page. Not surprising, too much effort and it might damage your paradigm, and that can't be allowed now can it?

He would be fine with the little words,the big words might be a problem.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

He would be fine with the little words,the big words might be a problem.

The War Illustrated is not a science journal. I had hoped that at least one of the deniers would read some or all of it. Foolish, but I'm ever optimistic.

 

[kageki]

He would be fine with the little words,the big words might be a problem.

Those big words, the titles, is not proof.

It can very easily be dismissed as Allied propaganda.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Those big words, the titles, is not proof.

It can very easily be dismissed as Allied propaganda.

See? You didn't read the articles. Proof. Thanks for the help there.

 

[switchpoint]

It's worse than you think. The Nazis not only tried to keep their prisoners healthy, they aggressively prosecuted crimes in the camps. Compare this with the US administration of Abu Graib, Bagram, Guantanamo, and a gulag of secret prisons.

To verify that the Nazis prosecuted crime in the camps, see articles on Konrad Morgen, the bloodhound judge, who headed more than 800 investigations, at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Konrad_Morgen

http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/trials/konradmorgen.html

Ok, you are fully delusional. You really have convinced yourself, despite reality, that the Nazis were the benevolent protectors of the Jewish people during World War II.

 

[kageki]

See? You didn't read the articles. Proof. Thanks for the help there.

Nothing that is written on them provides actual proof of intent.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Nothing that is written on them provides actual proof of intent.

Read the OP? Did it ask for proof of intent?

 

[aggle-rithm]

My own personal archival research,

Then you should have said so in the first place. Trying to sneak bald assertions by without mentioning a source doesn't fly in the JREF forums. You will be called on it, EVERY SINGLE TIME.

 

[kageki]

Read the OP? Did it ask for proof of intent?

So as I said earlier, explanation was given.

End of thread.

 

[aggle-rithm]

End of thread.

Wrong again.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

So as I said earlier, explanation was given.

End of thread.

"Explanation" is not spelled B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T.

 

[Chaos]

All that was requested was an explanation.

For future reference: an "explanation" is something that actually explains something - a task at which Nazi apologetics like yours fail abysmally.