TheBoyPaj said:
A simple question, Suggestologist (and please bear in mind my feeble intellect when wording your response). What level of reading about Reiki do I have to undertake before you will consider my opinion valid?
I prefer primary source experience. In other words, at least see it done. Better: have it done to you. Even better: do it yourself. And above all, give it an honest chance. If it's really BS, you'll have the opportunity to reevaluate sometime after the experience. Are you convinced enough in the fact that it's BS to not consider it BS for the time being while you experience it for yourself?
When I read about gestalt therapy, I wasn't satisfied. I went to a college media library and watched old black-and-white tapes of Friedrick "Fritz" Perls, smoking Cigars at Esalon while he worked with people.
Of course, I view things like reiki and auras and so on as synesthetic metaphors; I wouldn't necessarily expect most people to come to that conclusion.
And ... Metaphors are what We Live By.... Metaphors organize how we look at and react to the world. Ritual can deeply change the metaphors we use.
The idea that Reiki serves no beneficial funcion is ridiculous. And obviously so. Nearly anything can produce benefit. The question one should ask is not "Is anyone helped by doing X". Instead ask, "Are more people helped than hurt while doing X?" Because, you know, even labotomy did help some people.
And even pretending to be a tree with ripening fruit falling off of yourself for an hour each day can help some people.