Also, textual analysis really only says that about 30% of the sayings and stuff in the gospels are compatible with each other enough to have possibly been said by the same person. No more, no less.
The first and most obvious problem is, almost nobody agrees WHICH 30%, which is a problem. Different people have cherrypicked radically different and mutually incompatible Jesuseseseses. Which of them is the real one? Is any of them, actually? How many different persons have been mashed up into the one we got?
The second, is that the same kind of analysis actually says that the gospel writers didn't really know what was happening there. So insisting that one can still cherrypick what totally really happened there takes a bit of a leap of faith.
The third is that any analysis will also show that it's structured like an ancient novel, with structures like the chiasm and inclusio that tend not to happen like that in any given person's life. So whatever information the gospel writers had about Jesus, has been severely edited to fit that structure. At the VERY LEAST its chronology was rearranged.
The even bigger problem is: you can do the same for the myth of Cthulhu, as I've actually shown in another thread, a long time ago, in a galaxy far away. Or for Superman, Luke Skywalker, or count Pierre Bezukhov, or indeed Count Dracula, or your favourite Game Of Thrones character. If your only criterion is what the book says and what is compatible enough to be possible to have been said by the same person, then almost any character ever qualifies.
And I mean, 30% self-compatible is actually piss poor even for known fiction characters. Any author worth his salt will have his characters have consistent world views, until events in the novel warrant changing them, and then he/she actually shows that happening. If you wrote a character that is all over the place like Jesus in a modern novel, unless the whole POINT is that he's a big lying hypocrite, you wouldn't get it past any publisher.
