Hillary Clinton is Done

Status
Not open for further replies.
logger said:
Its very difficult for a woman to accuse rape and have it stick. But this man has a pattern, he has admitted to two affairs and accused of multiple others. Its enough for me to reject him in any private or public sector job.
Click to expand...

I get the feeling you would reject Ghandi/Schweitzer/Christ/name your hero, if he was a Democrat.
 
Tony Stark said:
The Christian right does reject the teachings of Jesus who was after all a dirty commie.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. I thought of throwing in a few fascist names, but thought it too provocative. And heaven forbid that provocation enter this thread.....
 
Loss Leader said:
I don't think that's at all fair. These claims (as vague as they are) have been investigated by all sorts of authorities over the course of decades. None have ever concluded that the President was guilty of sexual assault. The fact that there are a number of claims doesn't make any one of them more true.
Click to expand...

Agreed, but he has a pattern, it cannot be dismissed.

Many claims of rape are vague, many of these women have not had investigations because the women were threatened.
Have you heard Kathleen Willey's story? You do realize in 1992 she and her husband formed Virginia for Clinton?
 
Meadmaker said:
Just understand that you are pretty close to alone in your views. The majority of people don't care. Some people pretend to care, but most of those are just trying to score political points.
Click to expand...

No, I don't think I am alone, here there only be a few, but people understand what marriage infidelity is and these two clearly live it. Here people couldn't care less but that reflects on them, no ones ever accused the left of having morals.
 
bruto said:
The sanctity of marriage would seem a poor reason to condemn Hillary for sticking with her husband.
Click to expand...

Unless she was in on it for the furthering of her career. With all the known evidence, do you think she was in on it?
 
Craig4 said:
Who cares? She's applying to head the largest national security apparatus the world has ever known. Boy Scouts (or Girl Scouts) need not apply.
Click to expand...

If you can't trust her with things like this, how can you trust her in anything else.
 
logger said:
I doubt any of them would be liberals, can you imagine Ghandi celebrating an abortion?
Click to expand...

Citation please for anyone celebrating an abortion please.
:(
Continuing to deploy a strawman demonized notion of "lol librulz" doesn't lend credence to your position. It makes your position appear uninformed.
 
logger said:
Lol

Its just a fetus, a lump of tissue mass.

Enjoy
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ouTube-video-OWN-termination-three-weeks.html
Click to expand...

I still haven't seen anyone celebrating an abortion, unless we are using drastically different understandings for the term "celebrating". Generally nonplussed, a bit anxious and then relieved that a medical procedure which always carries a risk of complication was complete and unremarkable. But I see nothing that I would consider a celebration.

Must be pretty dull parties where ever it is you hale from...
 
logger said:
Unless she was in on it for the furthering of her career. With all the known evidence, do you think she was in on it?
Click to expand...
I suppose it depends on what you mean by "in on it." I think she'd have had to be blind not to know he was the sort of guy he was, and probably had some level of tolerance, a level I know I would neither have nor expect, but I'm not them. If her level of tolerance was influenced by the advantage of being first lady, and furthering her political career, yes, sure, probably. She was, after all, in an odd position of being married to a very powerful person whose connections were very useful, and I'd be surprised if she did not do a lot of calculating to decide what was worth what. I find that a less than wonderful recommendation with regard to personality, but I am not marrying the woman, I'm considering how and whether the calculations she made will be beneficial to government. If I were looking for someone to shoot pool and drink a beer with, i'd probably rather down a cold one with George W. Bush, but I'd never vote for him as president.

If by "in on it" you mean she was abetting or promoting Bill's infidelities,I don't have any reason to believe that's the case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom